The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Open accessAbstract
This book examines the shape, composition, and practices of the United States political media landscape. It explores the roots of the current epistemic crisis in political communication with a focus on the remarkable 2016 U.S. president election culminating in the victory of Donald Trump and the first year of his presidency. The authors present a detailed map of the American political media landscape based on the analysis of millions of stories and social media posts, revealing a highly polarized and asymmetric media ecosystem. Detailed case studies track the emergence and propagation of disinformation in the American public sphere that took advantage of structural weaknesses in the media institutions across the political spectrum. This book describes how the conservative faction led by Steve Bannon and funded by Robert Mercer was able to inject opposition research into the mainstream media agenda that left an unsubstantiated but indelible stain of corruption on the Clinton campaign. The authors also document how Fox News deflects negative coverage of President Trump and has promoted a series of exaggerated and fabricated counter narratives to defend the president against the damaging news coming out of the Mueller investigation. Based on an analysis of the actors that sought to influence political public discourse, this book argues that the current problems of media and democracy are not the result of Russian interference, behavioral microtargeting and algorithms on social media, political clickbait, hackers, sockpuppets, or trolls, but of asymmetric media structures decades in the making. The crisis is political, not technological.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response, communication scholars have adopted decades-old theories of propaganda and mass communication to understand disinformation and media manipulation online (154, 159, 160).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“This raises the possibility that some business models may be fundamentally incompatible with a healthy society (154).”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 999
Media and Responsibility for Their Effects: Instrumental vs. Environmental Views
Miroshnichenko, A. (2021) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws10020048 · Cited by 8
The Rise of and Demand for Identity-Oriented Media CoveragePreprint
Hopkins, D. J., Lelkes, Y., & Wolken, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4578004 · Cited by 8
Letizi, R. G. E., & Norman, C. (2023) · Games and Culture · doi:10.1177/15554120231168745 · Cited by 8
“Benkler et al. (2018) argue that these “ algorithmic ” processes create “ echo chambers that reinforced our biases, were removing indicia of trustworthiness, and were generally overwhelming our capacity to make sense of the world ” (p. 4).”
BackgroundHealthier information ecosystems: A definition and agenda
Introne, J. E., McKernan, B., Corsbie-Massay, C. L., Rohlinger, D. A., & Tripodi, F. B. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24949 · Cited by 7
Mont’Alverne, C., Arguedas, A. R., Banerjee, S., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241292700 · Cited by 8
Influencers as emerging actors in global digital propaganda
Xu, J. L., & Schneider, F. (2025) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494251351221 · Cited by 9
(Media Attention to) Misinformation Can Undermine Trust in Scientists
Hoes, E., von Hohenberg, B. C., Gessler, T., Qian, S., & Wojcieszak, M. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10090-y · Cited by 7
“Although these sites may occasionally convey accurate information, their incentive structures and reputational histories make them far more likely to publish misleading or false content than mainstream news outlets (Benkler et al. 2018; Grinberg et al. 2019).”
RT, Sputnik et le mouvement des Gilets jaunes : cartographie des communautés politiques sur Twitter
Gérard, C., Marotte, G., & Salamatian, L. (2020) · L’Espace Politique · doi:10.4000/espacepolitique.8092 · Cited by 7
Riot Platforms: Protest, Police, Planet
liu, M. C., Reyes, J. R. B., Sahoo, S., et al. (2022) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12861 · Cited by 7
Crowdsourcing Crisis Management and Democratic Legitimacy
Martí, J. L. (2022) · Digital Government Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3532670 · Cited by 7
The birth of identity biopolitics: How social media serves antiliberal populism
Judge, B. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099587 · Cited by 8
“Yochai Benkler recently concluded that contemporary subjects are “vulnerable to disinformation and ready to believe the worst, as long as it lines up with their partisan identity” (Benkler et al., 2018: 368).”
BackgroundOnline Illusions of Understanding
de Ridder, J. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2151331 · Cited by 7
Tomaz, T. (2023) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849231179781 · Cited by 7
Electoral Crisis Communications: Combatting Disinformation & the Contest for Electoral Legitimacy
Winger, G. H., Calfano, B., Vićić, J., & Harknett, R. J. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x231184440 · Cited by 5
An Epistemic Lens on Algorithmic Fairness
Edenberg, E., & Wood, A. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623248 · Cited by 8
Chagas, V. H. C. D. S. (2023) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2023.2290897 · Cited by 7
The Return of the Regulatory State: Nation-States as Policy Actors in Digital Platform Governance
Flew, T. (2023) · Global transformations in media and communication/Global transformations in media and communication research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29616-1_10 · Cited by 7
Ren, X. Y. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009464864 · Cited by 7
Assessing NATO’s cohesion: methods and implications
Kunertova, D., & Schmitt, O. (2024) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-024-00641-1 · Cited by 7
Populism, Fake News, and the Flight From Democracy
Nielsen, G. M. (2020) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2543-2.ch011 · Cited by 7
Cosentino, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43005-4_1 · Cited by 7
Knowledge socialism in the COVID-19 era: A collective exploration of needs, forms, and possibilities
Crain, D. E., Hollings, S., Kayode, H. M., et al. (2021) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.1952864 · Cited by 7
“Benkler et al. (2018) has shown how these features have emboldened right-wing political propagandists and provocateurs in particular.”
BackgroundOnline Misinformation and “Phantom Patterns”: Epistemic Exploitation in the Era of Big Data
Fritts, M., & Cabrera, F. (2021) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12451 · Cited by 8
Doerr, N., & Gardner, B. G. (2022) · Translation in Society · doi:10.1075/tris.21008.doe · Cited by 7
The Broken Internet and Platform Regulation: Promises and Perils
Winseck, D. R. (2022) · Palgrave global media policy and business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95220-4_12 · Cited by 7
Moral Grandstanding and the Norms of Moral Discourse
Flowerree, A. K., & Satta, M. (2023) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2023.8 · Cited by 7
Generational effects of culture and digital media in former Soviet Republics
Horne, B., Rice, N., Luther, C. A., Ruck, D. J., Borycz, J., Allard, S., FitzGerald, M., Manaev, O., Prins, B. C., Taylor, M., et al. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01670-6 · Cited by 6
Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., & Denovan, A. (2023) · Journal of Scientific Exploration · doi:10.31275/20232751 · Cited by 7
Trolls without borders: a comparative analysis of six foreign countries’ online propaganda campaigns
Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2023) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqad022 · Cited by 7
Bertolazzi, A., Bongelli, R., & Riccioni, I. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2227436 · Cited by 9
Kiess, J. M. (2023) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299231190731 · Cited by 7
Lorenz, A., Schmitt, C., McGregor, S. C., & Malmer, D. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.015 · Cited by 8
The Value of News: Aligning Economic and Social Value From an Institutional Perspective
Flew, T., & Stepnik, A. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.7462 · Cited by 7
French Fox News? Audience-level metrics for the comparative study of news audience hyperpartisanship
Labarre, J. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2300845 · Cited by 9
Untangling Taiwan’s Hybridity With Structural Dysfunctions
Rauchfleisch, A., & Chi, J.-Y. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120947658 · Cited by 7
Is the re-contextualization of digital writing inevitable, escapable or desirable?
Sefton‐Green, J. (2020) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2020.1857124 · Cited by 7
Audinet, M., & Limonier, K. (2022) · Questions de communication · doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.29005 · Cited by 7
Using International Relations Theories to Understand Disinformation
Anzera, G., & Massa, A. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119743347.ch3 · Cited by 7
Hutchens, M. J., Shaughnessy, B., & DuBosar, E. (2023) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2023.2264265 · Cited by 6
“Outrageous” Diplomacy: Investigating the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter
Massa, A., & Anzera, G. (2024) · Global Society · doi:10.1080/13600826.2024.2350999 · Cited by 6
Ryzhova, A., & Toepfl, F. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241257872 · Cited by 9
The brain digitalization: it's all happening so fast!
Boulos, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2024.1475438 · Cited by 9
Strategies for Land-Grant Universities to Foster Public Trust
Anderson, J. D., Malone, T., & Akridge, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/aae.2024.32 · Cited by 6
Hsiao, Y., & Hindman, M. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241300803 · Cited by 7
Yours Truly: A Credibility Framework for Effortless LLM-Powered Fact Checking
Krishnamurthy, V., & Balaji, V. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3520187 · Cited by 15
Loi, M., Fabbri, M., & Ferrario, A. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00903-7 · Cited by 13
Influence You Can Trust? Exploring Trust in Social Media Influencers for Political Information
Hasell, A., & Chinn, S. (2025) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642251344209 · Cited by 6
Knüpfer, C. B., Yang, Y., & Cowburn, M. (2025) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2025.2604708 · Cited by 8
“Other research has highlighted how new networks of digital news and social media influencers form “echo systems” (Starbird et al., 2018), engage in strategic mobilization for political objectives (Yang, 2025), and amplify Republican talking points (Benkler et al., 2018; Yang & Bennett, 2021).”
News Use, Political Knowledge, and Misperceptions in 18 Countries across the Global North
Aelst, P. V., Gehle, L., Schemer, C., Strömbäck, J., & Zoizner, A. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009632430 · Cited by 6
#DearSister and #MosqueMeToo: adversarial Islamic feminism within the Western-Islamic public sphere
Mincheva, D. (2021) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1984273 · Cited by 6
Wu, H. D. (2023) · Journal of International Communication · doi:10.1080/13216597.2022.2162099 · Cited by 6
“Alt-right Alt-right and extremist messages, quietly existing in some corners of cyberspace intended for limited, cliquish members, have been blamed to wreak havoc on traditional democracies (Benkler et al., 2018).”
Bailo, F., Johns, A., & Rizoiu, M.-A. (2023) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2205479 · Cited by 23
Political ignorance is both rational and radical
Gibbons, A. F. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04293-1 · Cited by 6
Knowledge-Making in Politics: Expertise in Democracy and Epistocracy
Lucky, M. C. (2023) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/00905917231199495 · Cited by 6
Epistemic injustice: complicity and promise in education
Nikolaidis, A. C., & Thompson, W. C. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad078 · Cited by 9
Auditing the audits: evaluating methodologies for social media recommender system audits
Bouchaud, P., & Morales, P. R. (2024) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-024-00668-6 · Cited by 7
Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack
Joachim, M., Castelló, I., & Parry, G. (2024) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503241281632 · Cited by 7
Danger of Misinformation and Science Denial: Background, Modern Examples, Future Action
Harman, J. J., Lorandos, D., Sherry, A. R., & Kaufman, M. R. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70006 · Cited by 8
Deep Storytelling: Collective Sensemaking and Layers of Meaning in U.S. Elections
Prochaska, S., Vera, J. A., Tan, D. L., Yamron, B., Venuto, S., Kejriwal, A., Chu, S., & Starbird, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757576 · Cited by 7
Zobel, G. (2019) · Communication Design Quarterly · doi:10.1145/3321388.3321392 · Cited by 6
The American Mega-Crisis: COVID-19 and Beyond
Parrott, B. (2020) · Challenge · doi:10.1080/05775132.2020.1804756 · Cited by 6
Media-centric or Politics-centric Political Communication Research? Some Reflections
Strömbäck, J. (2021) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1966598 · Cited by 6
Innes, M., & Dawson, A. (2022) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1002/symb.603 · Cited by 6
“…Agency ran an information operation designed to try and influence and interfere in the conduct of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, together with a series of related subsequent revelations, has attracted significant political and public attention (Benkler et al. 2018; Francois and Lin 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialHagar, N., & Shaw, A. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac032 · Cited by 6
Manufacturing Populism: Digitally Amplified Vernacular Authority
Howard, R. G. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i4.5857 · Cited by 6
Saulnier, A., & Sytsma, V. A. (2023) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2023.2174541 · Cited by 7
Fact-checkers and the news media: A Nordic perspective on propaganda
Gronvall, J. A. (2023) · Nordic Journal of Media Studies · doi:10.2478/njms-2023-0008 · Cited by 6
What’s the News About Bad News? A Review of Bad News Games as a Tool to Teach Media Literacy
Barabas, R. (2023) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2023-0043 · Cited by 7
Hwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
Evaluating conspiracy claims as public sphere communication
Culloty, E. (2021) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2021.1886421 · Cited by 6
The Rationality of Fundamentalist Belief
Malcolm, F. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12440 · Cited by 7
“The main function of an echo chamber is to restrict the flow of information to a group to that which confirms their pre-existing beliefs on particular matters (Elzinga 2020; Benkler et al. 2018, 76).”
Hughes, B., White, K., West, J., Criezis, M., Zhou, C. K., & Bartholomew, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312624 · Cited by 7
8 Disinformation about Migration: An age‐old Issue with New Tech Dimensions
Culloty, E., Suiter, J., Viriri, I., & Creta, S. (2022) · World Migration Report · doi:10.1002/wom3.29 · Cited by 9
“33 Benkler et al., 2018.”
Gérard, C., & Marotte, G. (2020) · Hérodote · doi:10.3917/her.177.0125 · Cited by 6
Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108886260 · Cited by 10
Assis, J. A., Komesu, F. C., & Pollet, M.-C. (2021) · Scripta · doi:10.5752/p.2358-3428.2021v25n54p9-38 · Cited by 7
Fact-Checking Misinformation: Eight Notes on Consensus RealityPreprint
Vinhas, O., & Bastos, M. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4004151 · Cited by 6
Kim, D.-G., & Kong, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2023.1243474 · Cited by 5
The Emotional Dynamics of Partisan Media and Political Misperceptions
Weeks, B. E. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009091121 · Cited by 6
Mapping the discursive landscape of data activism: Articulations and actors in an emerging movement
Liminga, A., & Lindgren, S. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241266416 · Cited by 5
Election Denial as a News Coverage Dilemma: A Survey Experiment with Local Journalists
Peterson, E., McGregor, S. C., & Block, R. (2025) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2025.2456524 · Cited by 6
Wang, R., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2508750 · Cited by 5
Zhang, Y., & Lian, R. (2025) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2025.2529999 · Cited by 5
“…counterpart, the right-wing media system exhibits some distinct characteristics, such as more frequent and intense outrage (Sobieraj & Berry, 2011), more concerted message amplification (González-Bailón et al., 2022), and greater susceptibility to mis-/dis-information (Benkler et al., 2018).”
Theoretical Bases of Methods of Counteraction to Modern Forms of Information Warfare
Bakirov, A. S., & Suleimenov, I. E. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14100410 · Cited by 17
Bird, D., & Knight, D. (2026) · Journal of Radio & Audio Media · doi:10.1080/19376529.2026.2612964 · Cited by 5
“Our analysis, combined with research indicating the heightened capacity for right-wing media to mobilize an ideologically aligned public (Benkler et al., 2018), and with the continual flow of disinformation and conspiracy content from the likes of Bannon’s War Room (Wirtschafter, 2023), raises…”
Mor, F., Nash, E. J., & Green, F. (2021) · Politics · doi:10.1177/02633957211012959 · Cited by 5
The Disinfectant Diversion: The Use of Narratives in Partisan News Media
Trifiro, B. M., Wells, C., & Rochefort, A. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2116719 · Cited by 6
“Putin’s War of Choice”: U.S. Propaganda and the Russia–Ukraine Invasion
Hyzen, A., & den Bulck, H. V. (2024) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia5010016 · Cited by 5
George, N., Sham, A., Ajith, T., & Bastos, M. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241269394 · Cited by 11
Pothitou, E., Perifanou, M. A., & Economides, A. A. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010041 · Cited by 9
Disinformation Dynamics and Regulation in Portugal: Insights from a Qualitative Study
Guedes, I., Vigo, B., Santos, M. A., Moreira, S., Cardoso, C. S., & Castro, J. (2025) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-025-09617-0 · Cited by 5
Hmielowski, J. D., Heffron, E. R., Ma, Y., & Munroe, M. A. (2021) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2021.1969510 · Cited by 5
“One potential source of this increasing reliance on identity could be increased access to partisan media outlets (Benkler et al., 2018; Jamieson & Cappella, 2008).”
Dolan, C. J. (2022) · SEEU Review · doi:10.2478/seeur-2022-0018 · Cited by 5
de Rooij, E. A., Stecula, D. A., & Pickup, M. A. (2022) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13178 · Cited by 5
Disinformation and the Return of Mass Society Theory
Christensen, M. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.3138/cjc.2022-10-11 · Cited by 5
Li, Q., Bond, R. M., & Garrett, R. K. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqad017 · Cited by 8
The return of propaganda: Historical legacies and contemporary conceptualisations
Bolin, G., & Kunelius, R. (2023) · Nordic Journal of Media Studies · doi:10.2478/njms-2023-0001 · Cited by 5
The wealthy as a barrier to tax reform
Page, B. I., & Seawright, J. (2023) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grad036 · Cited by 5
Twitter Propaganda Operations: Analyzing Sociopolitical Issues in Saudi Arabia
Albert, C. D., AlEroud, A. F., Yang, Y., Melhem, A., & Rutland, J. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231216964 · Cited by 6
Ozawa, J. V. S., Lukito, J., Bailez, F., et al. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-137 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2018-10-18
- OpenAlex
- W4213327489
- Cited by
- 1,504
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 269 · 2025: 260 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 116.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, disinformation, media polarization, conservative media, Steve Bannon, Fox News, Mueller investigation, counter-narratives, media and democracy, public sphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review