The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel
Abstract
Men take a proprietary view of women ’s sexuality and reproductive capacity. In this chapter, we (a) argue that sexually proprietary male psychologies are evolved solutions to the adaptive problems of male reproductive competition and potential misdirection of paternal investments in species with mistakable paternity; (b) describe the complex interrelated design of mating and paternal decision rules in some well-studied avian examples; (c) consider the peculiarities of the human species in this context; (d) characterize some features of human male sexual proprietariness, contrasting men ’s versus women ’s perspectives and actions; and (e) review some of the diverse consequences and manifestations of this ubiquitous male mindset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,252
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,221
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila
Bateman, A. J. (1948) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21 · Cited by 3,643
(1979) · Cited by 2,524
The Evolution of insect mating systems
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.189072 · Cited by 2,337
(1979) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1,905
(1971) · Cited by 1,778
Cited by
Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204 · Cited by 4,253
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development.
Harris, J. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.458 · Cited by 1,885
Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x · Cited by 1,263
The Myth of Sexual Symmetry in Marital Violence
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0064l · Cited by 965
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, M., & Daly, M.
- Venue
- The Adapted Mind
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1992-08-06
- Pages
- 289-326
- OpenAlex
- W2975835172
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 22.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0008
- The paper
- Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel. The Adapted Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
