The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects
Abstract
This is a comprehensive analysis of the present state of organization theory. The author traces the evolution and particularly the more recent history of the field, and its scope and content. He then considers the relevant literature organized by major issues and concepts. Jeffrey Pfeffer makes the point that the world of organizations the book surveys has changed in four important ways: the increasing externalization of the employment relation and the development of the "new employment contract;" the change in the size distribution of organizations, with a comparative growth in the proportion of smaller organizations; the increasing influence of external capital markets on organizational governance and decision making; and the increasing salary inequality within organizations in the U.S. compared both to the past and to other industrialized nations. These changes make it especially important to understand the organizations themselves. The author is a major scholar in the field of organizations and his perspective should be of considerable interest to scholars and students in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x · Cited by 1,386
Greckhamer, T. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2370 · Cited by 403
Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672012711008 · Cited by 328
Greckhamer, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840610380806 · Cited by 200
Carton, A. M., & Rosette, A. S. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0745 · Cited by 139
Reliable Effectiveness: A Theory on Sustaining and Replicating Worthwhile Innovations
Racine, D. P. (2006) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0047-1 · Cited by 55
Collective Student Trust: A Social Resource for Urban Elementary Students
Adams, C. M. (2014) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x13488596 · Cited by 37
“Creative Financing”: Funding Evidence-Based Interventions in Human Service Systems
Jaramillo, E. T., Willging, C. E., Green, A. E., Gunderson, L. M., Fettes, D. L., & Aarons, G. A. (2019) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-018-9644-5 · Cited by 33
Measuring the effectiveness of an alternative education collaboration: Newark, New Jersey
Genao, S. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-01-2013-0011 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeffer, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1997-06-05
- OpenAlex
- W4388148293
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.