Cited by 139Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalitySports, Gender, and Society

Explaining bias against Black leaders: integrating theory on information processing and goal-based stereotyping

Carton, Andrew M., Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby·2011·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

Approaches related to inference-based processing (e.g., romance-of-leadership theory) would suggest that black leaders are evaluated positively after success. In contrast, approaches related to recognition-based processing (e.g., leader categorization theory) would suggest that, because of stereotyping, black leaders are evaluated negatively regardless of their performance. To reconcile this discrepancy, we predicted that evaluators would engage in goal-based stereotyping by perceiving that black leaders—and not white leaders—fail because of negative leader-based attributes and succeed because of positive nonleader attributes (i.e., compensatory stereotypes). Multilevel analyses of archival data in the context of college football in the United States supported our predictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2009.0745

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research into minority leaders is scant although it is increasing.

    “However, unlike the research examining gender and leadership, research into minority leaders is scant although it is increasing (Carton & Rosette, 2011).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Carton & Rosette, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carton, A. M., & Rosette, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2011-12
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1141-1158
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2047151391
Cited by
139
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
information processing, leader evaluation, college football coaches, racial stereotypes, performance evaluation (human resources)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review