Cited by 2,141Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationContemporary Social and Educational Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theories of Communication Networks

Monge, Peter R., Contractor, Noshir·2003·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

To date, most network research contains one or more of five major problems. First, it tends to be atheoretical, ignoring the various social theories that contain network implications. Second, it explores single levels of analysis rather than the multiple levels out of which most networks are comprised. Third, network analysis has employed very little the insights from contemporary complex systems analysis and computer simulations. Foruth, it typically uses descriptive rather than inferential statistics, thus robbing it of the ability to make claims about the larger universe of networks. Finally, almost all the research is static and cross-sectional rather than dynamic. Theories of Communication Networks presents solutions to all five problems. The authors develop a multitheoretical model that relates different social science theories with different network properties. This model is multilevel, providing a network decomposition that applies the various social theories to all network levels: individuals, dyads, triples, groups, and the entire network. The book then establishes a model from the perspective of complex adaptive systems and demonstrates how to use Blanche, an agent-based network computer simulation environment, to generate and test network theories and hypotheses. It presents recent developments in network statistical analysis, the p* family, which provides a basis for valid multilevel statistical inferences regarding networks. Finally, it shows how to relate communication networks to other networks, thus providing the basis in conjunction with computer simulations to study the emergence of dynamic organizational networks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195160369.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,141

Metadata

Authors
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2003-03-27
OpenAlex
W1572955664
Cited by
2,141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 139
FWCI
14.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Social and Educational Issues
Keywords
communication networks, network theory, multilevel network analysis, network decomposition, complex adaptive systems, agent-based modeling, social network theory, network emergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review