The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theories of Communication Networks
Abstract
To date, most network research contains one or more of five major problems. First, it tends to be atheoretical, ignoring the various social theories that contain network implications. Second, it explores single levels of analysis rather than the multiple levels out of which most networks are comprised. Third, network analysis has employed very little the insights from contemporary complex systems analysis and computer simulations. Foruth, it typically uses descriptive rather than inferential statistics, thus robbing it of the ability to make claims about the larger universe of networks. Finally, almost all the research is static and cross-sectional rather than dynamic. Theories of Communication Networks presents solutions to all five problems. The authors develop a multitheoretical model that relates different social science theories with different network properties. This model is multilevel, providing a network decomposition that applies the various social theories to all network levels: individuals, dyads, triples, groups, and the entire network. The book then establishes a model from the perspective of complex adaptive systems and demonstrates how to use Blanche, an agent-based network computer simulation environment, to generate and test network theories and hypotheses. It presents recent developments in network statistical analysis, the p* family, which provides a basis for valid multilevel statistical inferences regarding networks. Finally, it shows how to relate communication networks to other networks, thus providing the basis in conjunction with computer simulations to study the emergence of dynamic organizational networks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, organizational communication researchers have contributed to the development of methodologies and methods of the complexity sciences and made them applicable to their own research context (Corman, Kuhn, McPhee, & Dooley, 2002;Monge & Contractor, 2003).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Monge & Contractor, 2003
In the citing paper
“Second, complexity theory and communication theories share much of the same roots in the early formulations of systems theories and information theory.”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Monge & Contractor, 2003
In the citing paper
“In particular, structuralfunctionalism, cybernetics, and general systems theory have been important to the study of organizational communication (Monge & Contractor, 2003).”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Monge & Contractor, 2003
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Monge and Contractor (2003) identified ABM as”
From Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground (2016) · cites this paper as Monge and Contractor (2003)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167742 · Cited by 3,365
Self-citationDissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2012) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001 · Cited by 1,355
Valente, T. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217330 · Cited by 1,271
Theorising interventions as events in systems
Hawe, P., Shiell, A., & Riley, T. (2009) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9 · Cited by 1,143
Metadata
- Authors
- Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2003-03-27
- OpenAlex
- W1572955664
- Cited by
- 2,141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 139
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Social and Educational Issues
- Keywords
- communication networks, network theory, multilevel network analysis, network decomposition, complex adaptive systems, agent-based modeling, social network theory, network emergence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review