Cited by 102Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyPain Management and Placebo Effect

Executive Control Without Conscious Awareness: The Cold Control Theory Of Hypnosis

Open access
Dienes, Zoltán, Perner, Josef·2007·Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective

Abstract

Control and awareness seem intimately related (e.g. Norman and Shallice 1986; Jacoby 1991). Of course, some forms of control occur quite unconsciously (plausibly, for example, the detailed configuring of motor movements; Milner and Goodale 1995). However, there are some forms of control, such as planning or overcoming strong response tendencies (the ‘executive tasks ‘ of Norman and Shallice) that are so commonly associated with conscious awareness that it would seem bizarre if they occurred without it. In fact, unconscious executive control is not possible in the theories of Norman and Shallice and Jacoby. In this chapter, we argue for the theoretical possibility of unconscious executive control, based on the higher order thought (HOT) theory of Rosenthal (1986, 2002, 2005), and then argue that hypnosis provides an example of executive control without conscious awareness (cf. Hilgard 1977; Spanos 1986; Oakley 1999).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198569794.003.0016

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One proposal that has begun to gain traction as a model of hypnotic suggestion is that distortions in the sense of agency in response to suggestions arise from aberrant metacognition in the form of reduced or delayed awareness of intentions.

    “One proposal that has begun to gain traction as a model of hypnotic suggestion is that distortions in the sense of agency in response to suggestions arise from aberrant metacognition in the form of reduced or delayed awareness of intentions (Dienes and Perner, 2007) see also (Kirsch and Lynn, 1998;Woody and Sadler, 2008).”

    From Hypnotic suggestibility in dissociative and related disorders: A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Dienes and Perner, 2007

  • Responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions is facilitated by reduced awareness of one's intentions, resulting in the classical suggestion effect.

    “The latter results are broadly consistent with the proposal that responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions is facilitated by reduced awareness of one's intentions (Dienes & Perner, 2007), resulting in the classical suggestion effect (i.e., the subjective experience that the response is automatic; Weitzenhoffer, 1974).”

    From Myths and misconceptions about hypnosis and suggestion: Separating fact and fiction (2020) · cites this paper as Dienes & Perner, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J.
Venue
Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective
Published
2007-01-18
Pages
293-316
OpenAlex
W37446888
Cited by
102
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.95
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
hypnosis, higher-order thought theory, conscious awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review