Cited by 1,076Research, Science, and AcademiaHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences

Whitley, Richard·2000

DOI 10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In a rapidly changing and inter-disciplinary world it is important to understand the nature and generation of knowledge, and its social organization. Increasing attention is paid in the social sciences and management studies to the constitution and claims of different theories, perspectives, and 'paradigms'. This book is one of the most respected and robust analyses of these issues. For this new paperback edition Richard Whitley - a leading figure in European business education - has written a new introduction which addresses the particular epistemological issues presented by management and business studies. He approaches the sciences as differently organized systems for the production and validation of knowledge - systems which become established in particular contexts and which generate different sorts of knowledge. He identifies seven major types of scientific field and discusses the establishment and growth of these sciences, including the major consequences of the nineteenth-century expansion of employment opportunities for researchers; the competitive pursuit of public reputations; and the domination of intellectual work by employees. He also examines the divergences in the way research is organized and controlled both in different fields, and in the same field within different historical circumstances. This book will be of interest to all graduate students concerned with the social study of knowledge, science, technology, and the history and philosophy of science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 998

Understanding information related fields: A conceptual framework
Zhang, P., & Benjamin, R. I. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20660 · Cited by 52
Evaluation Without Evaluators
Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2007) · Sociology of the sciences/Sociology of the sciences yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_6 · Cited by 51
Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs
Shibayama, S. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.030 · Cited by 55
Information Science and Its Core Concepts: Levels of Disagreement
Hjørland, B. (2013) · Studies in history and philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6973-1_9 · Cited by 51
Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in the sciences
Heimeriks, G. J., & Vasileiadou, E. (2008) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018407085747 · Cited by 49
Towards understanding integration in research and research policy
Luukkonen, T., & Nedeva, M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.008 · Cited by 57
Specialization in the Structure and Organization of Geography
Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (1988) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00189.x · Cited by 50
Navigating Uncertainty: Early Career Academics and Practices of Appraisal Devices
Nästesjö, J. (2020) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-020-09425-2 · Cited by 49
Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations
Vieira, P. C. C., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0292-7 · Cited by 47
Researchers' green open access practice: a cross‐disciplinary analysis
Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S. G., & White, S. (2013) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-01-2012-0008 · Cited by 49
e-Sciences as research technologies: reconfiguring disciplines, globalizing knowledge
Schroeder, R. (2008) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018408089075 · Cited by 48
Centres and Peripheries: Research Styles and Publication Patterns in ‘Top’ US Journals and their E uropean Alternatives, 1960–2010
Üsdiken, B. (2014) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12082 · Cited by 49
The evolution of research collaboration within and across disciplines in Italian Academia
Bellotti, E., Kronegger, L., & Guadalupi, L. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2068-1 · Cited by 49
Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences?
Bonaccorsi, A. J., Daraio, C. C., Fantoni, S., Folli, V., Leonetti, M., & Ruocco, G. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2384-0 · Cited by 50
Between charisma and heuristics: four styles of interdisciplinarity
Lengwiler, M. (2006) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.3152/147154306781778821 · Cited by 49
Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence
Wang, J., & Hicks, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.006 · Cited by 55
Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: a study of social sciences
Sugimoto, C. R., Sugimoto, T. J., Tsou, A., et al. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2087-y · Cited by 48
Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition
Røpke, I. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106515 · Cited by 48
The ‘Negotiated Space’ of University Researchers’ Pursuit of a Research Agenda
Luukkonen, T., & Thomas, D. A. (2016) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9291-z · Cited by 47
The role of metrics in peer assessments
Langfeldt, L., Reymert, I., & Aksnes, D. W. (2020) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvaa032 · Cited by 50
Scholarship and disciplinary practices
Palmer, C. L., & Cragin, M. H. (2008) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420112 · Cited by 47
Demystifying Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research
Greckhamer, T., Koro‐Ljungberg, M., Cilesiz, S., et al. (2008) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800407312049 · Cited by 47
PUBLIC SERVICES MANAGEMENT: ACTIVITIES, INITIATIVES AND LIMITS TO LEARNING
Harrow, J., & Willcocks, L. P. (1990) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00248.x · Cited by 47
‘The wild and wacky worlds of consumer oddballs’
Bode, M., & Østergaard, P. (2013) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593113478605 · Cited by 46
An Introduction to Modeling Science: Basic Model Types, Key Definitions, and a General Framework for the Comparison of Process Models
Börner, K., Boyack, K. W., Milojević, S., & Morris, S. (2011) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4_1 · Cited by 45
Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities
de Jong, S. P. L., & Muhonen, R. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy036 · Cited by 45
Career-based influences on scientific recognition in the United States and Europe: Longitudinal evidence from curriculum vitae data
Youtie, J., Rogers, J. D., Heinze, T., Philip Shapira, A., & Tang, L. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.002 · Cited by 44
Knowledge-Intensive University Spin-off Firms in South Africa: Fragile Network Alignment?
Kruss, G. (2008) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.5367/000000008785201784 · Cited by 45
Hidden in the Middle: Culture, Value and Reward in Bioinformatics
Lewis, J., Bartlett, A., & Atkinson, P. (2016) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9304-y · Cited by 45
How Do Established Firms Produce Breakthrough Innovations? Managerial Identity‐Dissemination Discourse and the Creation of Novel Product‐Market Solutions
Perra, D. B., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. (2017) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12390 · Cited by 47
The world wide web of research and access to knowledge
Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2009.13 · Cited by 45
Research collaboration in the social sciences: What factors are associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration?
Woolley, R., Sánchez‐Barrioluengo, M., Turpin, T., & Marceau, J. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scu074 · Cited by 45
The satiric vision of politics: Ethics, interests and disorders
Hall, I. (2012) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066112445187 · Cited by 43
The Selection of Scientific Talent in the Allocation of Research Grants
van Arensbergen, P., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/hep.2012.15 · Cited by 44
Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields
Andersen, J. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0408-8 · Cited by 44
Varieties of Knowledge and Their Use in Business and Management Studies: Conditions and Institutions
Whitley, R. D. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088152 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
The Performativity of Literature Reviewing: Constituting the Corporate Social Responsibility Literature Through Re-presentation and Intervention
Gond, J., Mena, S., & Mosonyi, S. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120935494 · Cited by 44
Triple, Quadruple, and Higher-Order Helices: Historical Phenomena and (Neo-)Evolutionary Models
Leydesdorff, L., & Smith, H. L. (2022) · Triple Helix Journal · doi:10.1163/21971927-bja10022 · Cited by 43
The Exchange of Knowledge
Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. M. (1997) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547097018003004 · Cited by 43
A data‐centered collaboration portal to support global carbon‐flux analysis
Agarwal, D., Humphrey, M., Beekwilder, N. F., et al. (2010) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.1600 · Cited by 42
The Impact of Institutional Reforms on the Nature of Universities as Organisations
Whitley, R. D., & Gläser, J. (2014) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20140000042000 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Explore with caution: mapping the evolution of scientific interest in physics
Aleta, A., Meloni, S., Perra, N., & Moreno, Y. (2019) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0205-9 · Cited by 43
Filling in the gaps: The interpretation of curricula vitae in peer review
Kaltenbrunner, W., & de Rijcke, S. (2019) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312719864164 · Cited by 43
The chasms of CSCW
Jacovi, M., Soroka, V., Gilboa-Freedman, G., Ur, S., Shahar, E., & Marmasse, N. (2006) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1180875.1180920 · Cited by 42
Social Science Approaches to e-Science: Framing an Agenda
Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00338.x · Cited by 42
Proliferation dynamics in new sciences
Bonaccorsi, A. J., & Vargas, J. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.002 · Cited by 42
Boundary Work
Fisher, D. (1988) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/0164025988010002004 · Cited by 41
The impact of heterogeneous shared leadership in scientific teams
Xu, H., Liu, M., Bu, Y., Sun, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Acuna, D. E., Gray, S., Meyer, E. T., & Ding, Y. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103542 · Cited by 42
Search strategies along the academic lifecycle
Horlings, E., & Gurney, T. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0789-3 · Cited by 44
Topics and Trends in Finance Research: What is Published, Who Publishes it and What Gets Cited?
Brooks, C., & Schopohl, L. (2017) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2018.02.001 · Cited by 41
Beyond conventional boundaries: Corporate governance as inspiration for critical accounting research
Gendron, Y. (2017) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2017.11.004 · Cited by 33
Specialization and promotion in an academic discipline
Leahey, E., Keith, B., & Crockett, J. L. (2009) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2009.12.001 · Cited by 40
Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective
Thelwall, M. A. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0669-x · Cited by 39
How smart is specialisation? An analysis of specialisation patterns in knowledge production
Heimeriks, G. J., & Balland, P. (2015) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scv061 · Cited by 40
Boundary-crossing careers and the ‘third space of hybridity’: Career actors as knowledge brokers between creative arts and academia
Lam, A. (2017) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x17746406 · Cited by 48
The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Education as a Scientific Field
Landström, H., Gabrielsson, J., Politis, D., Sørheim, R., & Djupdal, K. (2021) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2020.0140 · Cited by 50
Open science in e‐science: contingency or policy?
Fry, J., Schroeder, R., & den Besten, M. (2009) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410910926103 · Cited by 40
Mapping eParticipation Research: Four Central Challenges
Rose, J., & Sanford, C. C. (2007) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02055 · Cited by 40
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194805 · Cited by 39
Falsification by Atrophy: The Kuhnian Process of Rejecting Theory in US Criminology
Dooley, B. D., & Goodison, S. E. (2019) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azz026 · Cited by 39
How universities influence societal impact practices: Academics’ sense-making of organizational impact strategies
de Jong, S. P. L., & Balaban, C. (2022) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scac012 · Cited by 39
From Thought to Theory to School: The Role of Contextual Factors in the Evolution of Schools of Management Thought
Ofori‐Dankwa, J. C., & Julian, S. D. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605054620 · Cited by 39
Managing Reform in Universities
Stensaker, B., Välimaa, J., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137284297 · Cited by 40
Profession scientifique et instruments politiques : l’impact du financement « sur projet » dans des laboratoires de nanosciences
Jouvenet, M. (2011) · Sociologie du Travail · doi:10.4000/sdt.7881 · Cited by 39
International Co‐Authorship and Research Team Performance in Colombia
Ordóñez–Matamoros, G., Cozzens, S. E., & García, M. (2010) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00449.x · Cited by 39
Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting
Wilts, A. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00050-5 · Cited by 39
Connecting Knowledge to Management: The Case of Academic Research
Sousa, C. A. A., & Hendriks, P. (2008) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508408091004 · Cited by 38
Organizational factors influencing scholarly performance: a multivariate study of biomedical research groups
Verbree, M., Horlings, E., Groenewegen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1437-x · Cited by 39
Alignment and theory in Corporate Real Estate alignment models
Heywood, C. A., & Arkesteijn, M. H. (2017) · International Journal of Strategic Property Management · doi:10.3846/1648715x.2016.1255274 · Cited by 38
Metrics and mechanisms: Measuring the unmeasurable in the science of science
Wu, L., Kittur, A., Youn, H., Milojević, S., Leahey, E., Fiore, S. M., & Ahn, Y. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101290 · Cited by 44
Novel mode of knowledge production? Producers and consumers in health services research
Ferlie, E. B., & Wood, M. (2003) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581903322405171 · Cited by 38
Science, the public, and social elites: How the general public, scientists, top politicians and managers perceive science
Prpić, K. (2010) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662510366363 · Cited by 37
Which international co‐authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., Abdoli, M., Stuart, E., Makita, M., Wilson, P., & Levitt, J. M. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24881 · Cited by 36
Digital disciplinary differences: An analysis of computer-mediated science and ‘Mode 2’ knowledge production
Heimeriks, G. J., van den Besselaar, P., & Frenken, K. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.012 · Cited by 37
Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities
Verleysen, F. T., & Weeren, A. J. T. M. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.004 · Cited by 37
A comparison of cognitive and organizational classification of publications in the social sciences and humanities
Guns, R., Sīle, L., Eykens, J., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2775-x · Cited by 36
Economics of science: survey and suggestions
Sent, E. (1999) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501789900000005 · Cited by 37
Organizational Use of Evaluations
Hansson, F. (2006) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389006066970 · Cited by 37
The “natural preserve of anthropologists”: social anthropology, scientific planning and development
de L’Estoile, B. (1997) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901897036002006 · Cited by 36
Editorial board interlocks in financial economics
Andrikopoulos, A. A., & Economou, L. (2014) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.015 · Cited by 37
Reflections on the micro–macro divide: Ideas from the trenches and moving forward
Eckardt, R., Crocker, A., Ahn, Y., Floyd, S. W., Boyd, B., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Moliterno, T. P., & Starbuck, W. H. (2018) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127018770048 · Cited by 36
Knowledge Formations
Turner, S. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.2 · Cited by 36
A solid base for decisions
Westerheijden, D. F. (1997) · Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1002995623272 · Cited by 36
Generations of interdisciplinarity in bioinformatics
Bartlett, A., Lewis, J., & Williams, M. L. (2016) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636778.2016.1184965 · Cited by 35
An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory
Horta, H., & Santos, J. M. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2012-4 · Cited by 36
Are evaluative cultures national or global? A cross-national study on evaluative cultures in academic recruitment processes in Europe
Reymert, I., Jungblut, J., & Borlaug, S. B. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00659-3 · Cited by 39
A New Take on the Categorical Imperative: Gatekeeping, Boundary Maintenance, and Evaluation Penalties in Science
Fini, R., Jourdan, J., Perkmann, M., & Toschi, L. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1610 · Cited by 37
The Social Orders of Research Evaluation Systems
Gläser, J. (2007) · Sociology of the sciences/Sociology of the sciences yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_12 · Cited by 35
Big data and Wikipedia research: social science knowledge across disciplinary divides
Schroeder, R., & Taylor, L. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008538 · Cited by 35
Understanding Differences: Searching for the Social Processes that Construct and Reproduce Variety in Science and Economic Organization
Whitley, R. D. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606066309 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
The Web impact of open access social science research
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. A. (2007) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.05.003 · Cited by 35
Economics and Anthropology—Reluctant Partners
Casson, M. (1996) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679604900902 · Cited by 35
How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system
Aman, V. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2092-1 · Cited by 35
Synergy and policy-making in German innovation systems: Smart Specialisation Strategies at national, regional, local levels?
Ruhrmann, H., Fritsch, M. J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2021) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1872780 · Cited by 34
CONDUITS OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE ASIA PACIFIC
Turpin, T., Woolley, R., Marceau, J., et al. (2008) · Asian Population Studies · doi:10.1080/17441730802496490 · Cited by 34
Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures
Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2002) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10144 · Cited by 30
THE NATURE OF MANAGEMENT? A PROBLEM FOR MANAGEMENT EDUCATION
Stewart, R. (1984) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00414.x · Cited by 34
Psychologists’ research activities and professional information-seeking behaviour: Empirical analyses with reference to the theory of the Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences
Krampen, G., Fell, C. B., & Schui, G. (2011) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551511412148 · Cited by 33
Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science—Leading to fragmentation?
Vakkari, P., Chang, Y., & Järvelin, K. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24690 · Cited by 33
Machine learning prediction of academic collaboration networks
Resce, G., Zinilli, A., & Cerulli, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26531-1 · Cited by 34

Authors: Whitley, R.
Corresponding author: Whitley, Richard
Publisher: Oxford University PressOxford
Published: 2000-06-29
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001
OpenAlex: W4388150685
Cited by: 1,076
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 70 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 47
FWCI: 28.11
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords: social organization of science, business education, scientific paradigms, history of science, philosophy of science, research organization, knowledge production, scientific reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks