The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier
Abstract
Today’s economy runs on knowledge, and most companies work assiduously to capitalize on that fact. They use cross-functional teams, customer-or product-focused business units, and work groups-to name just a few organizational forms-to capture and spread ideas and know-how. In many cases, these ways of organizing are very effective, and no one would argue for their demise. But a new organizational form is emerging that promises to complement existing structures and radically galvanize knowledge sharing, learning, and change. It’s called the community of practice. What are communities of practice? In brief, they are groups of people informally bound together by shared expertise and passion for a joint enterprise engineers engaged in deep-water drilling, for example, consu1tants who specialize in strategic marketing, or frontline managers in charge of check processing at a large commercial bank.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Day, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks
Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2003.11851845 · Cited by 697
Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms
Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003 · Cited by 485
COVID ‐19 crisis and SMEs responses: The role of digital transformation
Klein, V. B., & Todesco, J. L. (2021) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.1660 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M.
- Venue
- Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2006-08-17
- Pages
- 259-269
- ISSN
- 2199-8663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1592309167
- Cited by
- 3,320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 639.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780199291793.003.0017
- The paper
- Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2006). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291793.003.0017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.