Cited by 131Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms

Waldner, David·2012·Oxford Handbooks Online

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392753.013.0004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waldner, D.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Waldner, David
Venue
Oxford Handbooks Online
Published
2012-08-06
OpenAlex
W183786351
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.51
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
process tracing, causal mechanisms, causal explanation, causal inference, qualitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review