CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesRace, History, and American SocietyCultural Identity and Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Anthropology of Archaeology: The Benefits of Public Intervention at African-American Archaeological Sites

LaRoche, Cheryl Janifer·2012·The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology
DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Archaeology occupies an important place in historicizing the African American experience – principally where little historical evidence survives. The nature of African American archaeology is such that archaeologists are continually challenged by the unexpected and hampered by the unknown. These are the qualities of the field that alternately inflame and inspire the public. This article examines the constructive outcomes, lasting societal benefits, and enduring commemorative legacies that arise when individuals act collectively to define historical value and meaning through archaeology. Public intervention-shaped research and eventual outcomes at the four sites are discussed, namely: The President's House in Philadelphia; the Henrietta Marie; the Freedmen's Cemetery in Alexandria, VA; and New York City's African Burial Ground. For each site, the public has played a major role in reclamation, scholarly and public interpretation, and, finally, monumental recognition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0033

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bertsch, A. (2008). ‘Living Legends: Two Women Who Restored a Cemetery’, Alexandria Gazette Packet, 19 November, electronic edition, http://connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=322366&paper=59&cat=180 accessed 23 August 2010.
  2. 2006, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents
  3. 2003, Unearthing Gotham: The Archaeology of New York
  4. 1999, The Wreck of the Henrietta Marie: An African-American's Spiritual Journey to Uncover a Sunken Slave Ship's Past
  5. 1991, New York Times
  6. Gerson, E. (2000). ‘A Thirst for Complete Freedom: Why Fugitive Slave Ona Judge Staines Never Returned to her Master, President George Washington’, MA thesis, Harvard University. See also article derived from this thesis, published online at SeacoastNH.com, http://seacoastnh.com/blackhistory/ona.html accessed 23 August 2010.
  7. 1993, Bones and Bureaucrats: New York's Great Cemetery Imbroglio, Archaeology Magazine
  8. 2008, paper presented at the National Council on Public History Annual Meeting,
  9. 2006, Statement of Work (SOW): Archaeological Investigations at the President's House Archaeological Site
  10. 2001, $21 Million Mired in Woe Researchers, Fed Wrangle over African Burial Ground
  11. 2002, The President's House in Philadelphia: The Rediscovery of a Lost Landscape, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography
  12. Loviglio, J. (2002). ‘Historians Decry Work Near George Washington Slave Quarters’, Associated Press, 30 March, http://www.stratalum.org/gwslaves.html accessed 22 May 2011.
  13. 2004, The New York African Burial Ground Project: Past Biases, Current Dilemmas, and Future Research Opportunities, Historical Archaeology
  14. 2005, Editorial’,, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography
  15. 2008, Archaeology
  16. ——– and City of Philadelphia (2009). ‘President's House Exhibit Concepts under Revision’, press release issued by Michael A. Nutter, Mayor, City of Philadelphia, and Cynthia MacLeod, Superintendent, Independence National Historical Park, available at http://www.ushistory.org/presidentshouse/news/pr122309.htm accessed 22 May 2011.
  17. 2008, Philadelphia celebrated the first ‘Oney Judge Day’ at the President's House site marking the 160th anniversary of Judge Staines's death.
  18. 2009, Philadelphia Inquirer
  19. 2002, Philadelphia Inquirer
  20. 1998, Daily News
  21. 2002, National Geographic
  22. 1994, Slave Ship: The Story of the Henrietta Marie
  23. 1998, Atlanta Journal/The Atlanta Constitution
  24. 2000, The Cornell West Reader

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LaRoche, C. J.
Affiliations
American Studies, University of Maryland
Corresponding author
LaRoche, Cheryl Janifer
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2012-09-18
Pages
629-658
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199237821.013.0033
OpenAlex
W2680292279
Semantic Scholar
41f0a45939cbc1c7e4ec5e369c1a4f4b379a2a9c
Cited by
6
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.33
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
Keywords
African American archaeology, African American history, public participation in archaeology, historic preservation, commemoration, African Burial Ground, Alexandria, Virginia, collective memory, historical interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review