CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The New York African Burial Ground Project: Past Biases, Current Dilemmas, and Future Research Opportunities

Mack, Mark E., Blakey, Michael L.·2004·Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/bf03376629
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03376629

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ABG project had a major impact on popular and scholarly perceptions of where slavery existed, the embodied consequences of enslavement, the roles that descendants and other publics can have in shaping research agendas, and the aspects of African American culture that have roots in West Africa.

    “The project had a major impact on popular (and scholarly) perceptions of where slavery existed, the embodied consequences of enslavement (Blakey & Rankin-Hill 2016, Mack & Blakey 2004), the roles that descendants and other publics can have in shaping research agendas (Blakey 2020), and the aspects of African American culture that have roots in West Africa (Perry et al. 2009).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Mack & Blakey 2004

  • The ABG team, in collaboration with the descendant community, has transformed African American archaeology and archaeology in general.

    “Certainly, the team working at the ABG, in collaboration with their ethical client-the descendant community-has transformed African American archaeology and archaeology in general (Blakey 2010(Blakey , 2020;;LaRoche 2011;Mack & Blakey 2004).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Mack & Blakey 2004

  • Archaeologists now frequently team up with organizations that represent the interests of local and descendant communities.

    “Heeding calls to acknowledge the authority of the ethical client, calls that originated with colleagues from HBCUs (Mack & Blakey 2004), archaeologists now frequently team up with the organizations that represent the interests of local and descendant communities (Matthews 2020).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Mack & Blakey 2004

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Blakey, Michael L. 1997 Past Is Present: Comments on “In the Realm of Politics: Prospects for Public Participation in African-American Plantation Archaeology.” Historical Archaeology, 31(3):140–145. · DOI
  2. Drake, St. Clair 1980 Anthropology and the Black Experience. The Black Scholar, 11:2–31. · DOI
  3. DuBois, W.E.B. 1903 The Souls of Black Folk. Reprinted in 1997 by Bedford Books, Boston, MA.
  4. Forman, Shepard (Editor) 1994 Diagnosing America: Anthropology and Public Engagement. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  5. Handler, Jerome S. 1994 Determining African Birth from Skeletal Remains: A Note on Tooth Mutilation. Historical Archaeology, 28(3):113–119. · DOI
  6. Hansberry, William L. 1923 Howard University Record, 17:8.
  7. Hill, Mary C., Mark E. Mack, and Michael L. Blakey 1995 Women, Endurance, Enslavement: Exceeding the Physiological Limits. Skeletal Biology IV: Women’s Bodies, Women’s Lives: Biological Indicators of Labor and Occupation. Abstract, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement, 20:110–111.
  8. Howard University and John Milner Associates, Inc. 1993 Research Design for Archeological, Historical, and Bioanthropological Investigations of the African Burial Ground (Broadway Block) New York, NY. 14 December. Howard University, Washington, DC, and John Milner Associates, Inc., New York, NY.
  9. Howells, W. W. 1973 Cranial Variation in Man. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Papers, Vol. 67. Cambridge, MA.
  10. Irish, Joel D. 1997 Characteristic High- and Low-Frequency Dental Traits in Sub-Saharan African Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102:455–467. · DOI
  11. LaRoche, Cheryl J., and Michael L. Blakey 1997 Seizing Intellectual Power: The Dialogue at the New York African Burial Ground. Historical Archaeology, 31(3):84–106. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Office of Public Education and Interpretation 1995–1998 Monthly Reports. Office of Public Education and Interpretation, 6 World Trade Center, New York, NY. [Interim mailing address for OPEI offices is 201 Varick St., Room 1021, New York, NY 10014.]
  13. Ofori-Ansa, Kwaku 1995 Identification and Validation of the Sank of a Symbol. Update: Newsletter of the African Burial Ground and Five Points Archaeological Projects, 1(8):3. (Office of Public Education and Interpretation, 6 World Trade Center, New York, NY.) [Interim mailing address for OPEI offices is 201 Varick St., Room 1021, New York, NY 10014.]
  14. Ortner, Donald J. 1966 A Recent Occurrence of an African Tooth Type Mutilation in Florida. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 25:177–180. · DOI
  15. Turner, Christy G., II, Christian R. Nichol, and G. Richard Scott 1991 Scoring Procedures for Key Morphological Traits of the Permanent Dentition: The Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System. In Advances in Dental Anthropology, Marc A. Kelley and Clark S. Larsen, editors, pp. 13–32. Wiley-Liss, New York, NY.
  16. Turvey, Timothy A., Katherine W. L. Vig, and Raymond J. Fonseca (Editors) 1996 Facial Clefts and Craniosynostosis: Principles and Management. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
  17. Willis, W. Bruce 1998 The Adinkra Dictionary: A Visual Primer on the Language of Adinkra. The Pyramid Complex, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mack, M. E., & Blakey, M. L.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
10-17
ISSN
  • 0440-9213
  • 2328-1103
DOI
10.1007/bf03376629
Cited by
70
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review