Cited by 96Corporate Identity and ReputationManagement and Organizational StudiesCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Meeting Expectations: A Role-Theoretic Perspective on Reputation

Jensen, Michael, Kim, Heeyon, Kim, Bo Kyung·2012·Oxford Handbooks Online

Abstract

This article combines reputation theory from economics with role theory from sociology to develop a rigorous framework for studying corporate reputation. Reputation research has taken different paths in economics, sociology, and management. The article argues that integrative reputation definitions limit reputation research in at least three different ways. The role-theoretic perspective on reputation tightens the link between theory development and empirical research. The role expectations and role performances allow reputation to function as a mechanism that can result in status mobility. Additionally, the role-theoretic approach to reputation research obviously increases the theoretical and empirical demands for future research in terms of determining the role expectations necessary to understand and assess the role performances that strengthen reputation. It is believed that integrating role theory into reputation research is an effort well worth undertaking to provide reputation research with a stronger theoretical footing and empirical direction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199596706.013.0007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 96

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, M., Kim, H., & Kim, B. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
Venue
Oxford Handbooks Online
Published
2012-07-19
OpenAlex
W1683681834
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.22
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
corporate reputation, role theory, role expectations, role performance, status mobility, reputation theory, integrative theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review