The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement and Statistical Issues in Child Assessment Research
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, this approach to test bias is flawed; the simple comparison of mean scores is not a statistically sound way of determining a test's psychometric properties, as a number of researchers have highlighted (e.g., Reynolds and Lowe 2009;Reynolds and Keith 2013).”
From Is the Cattell–Horn–Carroll-based factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition (WISC-V) construct invariant for a representative sample of African–American, Hispanic, and Caucasian male and female students ages 6 to 16 years? (2016) · cites this paper as Reynolds and Keith 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000358 · Cited by 106
Beaujean, A. A., Parkin, J., & Parker, S. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0036745 · Cited by 50
Testing Spearman's hypotheses using a bi-factor model with WAIS-IV/WMS-IV standardization data
Frisby, C. L., & Beaujean, A. A. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.007 · Cited by 39
Lowe, P. A. (2015) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282915580763 · Cited by 35
Scheiber, C. (2016) · Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/s40817-016-0019-7 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, M. R., & Keith, T. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- ORCID
- Reynolds, Matthew R.
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W307054791
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- child assessment, measurement, statistical analysis, child development, psychometrics, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
