The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PREVALENCE OF DEPRESSION IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY1
Abstract
The occurrence of depression was determined during the summer of 1979 in a multi-ethnic probability sample of 1003 adults (66% participation) in Los Angeles County, as part of a community survey of the epidemiology of depression and help-seeking behavior. The primary measure of depression was the 20-item CES-D scale developed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies. The overall prevalence of depression based on a CES-D cutpoint definition of 16 or greater was 19.1%. The prevalence of depression was greatest among Hispanics (27.4%) and least among whites (15.6%), with blacks and others at an intermediate level (21.8% and 21.2%, respectively). Females (23.5%) were nearly twice as likely to be depressed as males (12.9%). By age, persons 18-24 years reported the highest rate of depression (27.4%), while those 45-64 years reported the lowest (16.3%). As expected, the prevalence of depression was strongly related to family income, with the highest level reported for those earning less than $8500 (29.3%); the lowest level for those earning more than $25,000 (9.0%). After controlling for effects of selected demographic and socioeconomic variables, neither race nor ethnicity were significantly related to the presence of depression. This suggests that the economic strain experienced by many minorities may be an important determinant of higher rates of depression among blacks and Hispanics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Screening for Depression in Well Older Adults: Evaluation of a Short Form of the CES-D
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30622-6 · Cited by 5,403
Screening for Adolescent Depression: A Comparison of Depression Scales
ROBERTS, R. E., LEWINSOHN, P. M., & SEELEY, J. R. (1991) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199101000-00009 · Cited by 850
6/Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with Older Adults
Sawyer Radloff, L., & Teri, L. (1986) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_06 · Cited by 768
Assessment of depression in adolescents using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
Roberts, R. E., Andrews, J. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Hops, H. (1990) · Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.2.2.122 · Cited by 521
Siegel, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1081 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- FRERICHS, R. R., ANESHENSEL, C. S., & CLARK, V. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 691-699
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1940648916
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREVALENCE OF DEPRESSION IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113149
- The paper
- FRERICHS, R. R., ANESHENSEL, C. S., & CLARK, V. A. (1981). PREVALENCE OF DEPRESSION IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY1. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.