Cited by 483Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Stressful life events and use of physician services among the elderly: The moderating role of pet ownership.

Siegel, Judith M.·1990·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The physician utilization behavior of 938 Medicare enrollees in a health maintenance organization was prospectively followed for 1 year. With demographic characteristics and health status at baseline controlled for, respondents who owned pets reported fewer doctor contacts over the 1-year period than respondents who did not own pets. Furthermore, pets seemed to help their owners in times of stress. The accumulation of prebaseline stressful life events was associated with increased doctor contacts during the study year for respondents without pets. This relationship did not emerge for pet owners. Owners of dogs, in particular, were buffered from the impact of stressful life events on physician utilization. Additional analyses showed that dog owners in comparison to owners of other pets spent more time with their pets and felt that their pets were more important to them. Thus, dogs more than other pets provided their owners with companionship and an object of attachment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have demonstrated the association between pet ownership and cardiovascular health, and dog owners appear to have a significantly greater chance of survival after a heart attack compared to people without pets.

    “Many studies have demonstrated the association between pet ownership and cardiovascular health and dog owners appear to have a significantly greater chance of survival after a heart attack compared to people without pets [25,26,27].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegel, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Siegel, Judith M.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1990
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
1081-1086
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2169747373
Cited by
483
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (1R01 AGO 5188-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
life events, physician utilization, older adults, pet ownership, dogs, moderating effect, health maintenance organizations, Medicare enrollees, companionship, pet attachment, stress buffering
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Human-Animal Bond, California, Depression, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Object Attachment, Physician-Patient Relations, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review