Cited by 770Aging, Health, and DisabilityAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth and Well-being Studies

6/Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with Older Adults

Sawyer Radloff, Lenore, Teri, Linda·1986·Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j018v05n01_06

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sawyer Radloff, L., & Teri, L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
1986-11-18
Volume
5
Issue
1-2
Pages
119-136
ISSN
  • 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2301
OpenAlex
W1983185375
Cited by
768
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, depression screening, older adults, geriatric depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review