The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
Abstract
GLADYS BLOCK; A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS, American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 115, Issue 4, 1 April 1982, Pages 492–505, https:/
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, prospective recording of food consumption can alter the type and quantity of foods eaten and, therefore, introduce bias into the estimate of food intake [11-13].”
From Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me Food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record (2014) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A DATA-BASED APPROACH TO DIET QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN AND TESTING
Block, G., Hartman, A. M., DRESSER, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Gannon, J. G., & Gardner, L. B. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114416 · Cited by 2,150
Self-citationKennedy, E., Ohls, J. C., Carlson, S. J., & Fleming, K. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00300-2 · Cited by 1,626
Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study
Mirmiran, P., Hosseini Esfahani, F., Mehrabi, Y., Hedayati, M., & Azizi, F. (2010) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980009991698 · Cited by 1,292
“To mention other limitations, the methods used for dietary assessment are subject to variations((29,41)) and therefore comparison between the two methods may not be precise; however, we evaluated the relative validity((42)) to partly overcome this problem.”
Allhoff, P., Laaser, U., & Heinrich, J. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-95642-3_7 · Cited by 1,331
Dietary Assessment Resource Manual
Thompson, F. E., & Byers, T. (1994) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/124.suppl_11.2245s · Cited by 1,235
Metadata
- Authors
- BLOCK, G.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- BLOCK, GLADYS
- ORCID
- BLOCK, GLADYS
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-04
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 492-505
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2275310832
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 30.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- dietary assessment, validation, food frequency questionnaire, 24-hour dietary recall, methodological validity
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Diet Surveys, Epidemiologic Methods, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
