Cited by 1,292Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

Open access
Mirmiran, Parvin, Hosseini Esfahani, Firoozeh, Mehrabi, Yadollah, Hedayati, Mahdi, Azizi, Fereidoon·2010·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To describe the relative validity and reliability of the FFQ used for assessing nutrient intakes of participants in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS). Design: A total of 132 subjects (sixty-one males and seventy-one females) were included in the study. Dietary data were collected monthly by means of twelve 24 h dietary recalls (24hDR). Subjects completed two, 168-item semi-quantitative FFQ. Blood and urine samples were taken every season for measurement of plasma biomarkers and urinary N and K. Results: Mean age and BMI of the participants were 35·5 ( sd 16·8) years and 25·5 ( sd 5·2) kg/m 2 , respectively. The mean energy-adjusted and deattenuated correlation coefficients for overall nutrient intake between the 24hDR and FFQ2 were 0·44 and 0·37 in ≤35-year-olds and >35-year-olds, respectively, and for individual nutrients ranged from 0·24 to 0·71 in men (mean r = 0·53) and from 0·11 to 0·60 in women (mean r = 0·39). The mean energy-adjusted reliability coefficients varied from 0·48 in ≤35-year-olds to 0·65 in >35-year-olds, and ranged from 0·41 to 0·79 in men (mean r = 0·59) and from 0·39 to 0·74 in women (mean r = 0·60). The FFQ2 and 24hDR produced exact agreement rates ranging between 39·6 % and 68·3 % in men and between 39·6 % and 54·1 % in women. The ranges of questionnaire validity coefficients, with the sample correlation between the questionnaires and biochemical marker as the lower limit and the estimate obtained by the method of triads as the upper limit, were 0·21–0·56 (protein) and 0·37–0·61 (K). Conclusions: The FFQ developed for the TLGS has reasonable relative validity and reliability for nutrient intakes in Tehranian adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980009991698

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]20. Ghafarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A & Kianfar H (1999) The Manual for Household Measures, Cooking Yields Factors and Edible Portion of Food. Tehran: Keshavarzi Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mirmiran, P., Hosseini Esfahani, F., Mehrabi, Y., Hedayati, M., & Azizi, F.
Affiliations
  • Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Mirmiran, Parvin
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2009-10-07
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
654-662
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W1989046008
Cited by
1,292
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
food frequency questionnaire, dietary assessment, nutrient intake, 24-hour dietary recall, questionnaire validity, questionnaire reliability, plasma biomarkers, urinary nitrogen, urinary potassium, protein intake, sex differences, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Iran, Male, Nitrogen, Potassium, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Risk Factors, Seasons, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review