The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
USE OF TIME TO PREGNANCY TO STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES
Abstract
There is need in reproductive epidemiology for sensitive and convenient screening tools that can be used to study environmental and occupational exposures. The measurement of fecundability (the probability of pregnancy in each cycle) by ascertaining how long it takes couples to conceive, may be useful for this purpose. Theoretically, exposures that interfere with any of the biologic processes involved in achieving pregnancy could lower fecundability among exposed men or women. To evaluate problems with collecting data on time to pregnancy, telephone interviews were conducted with nearly 700 pregnant women who reported having planned their pregnancies. Power curves were developed based on the distribution of time to pregnancy in the interviewed population. These curves indicate that relatively small sample sizes are sufficient for investigating an exposure. For example, the authors estimate that to detect a given 50% drop in mean fecundability with 80% power would require data from 55 exposed and 55 unexposed women who are pregnant. Disadvantages of using time to pregnancy as a reproductive endpoint include susceptibility to selection bias and need for data on several potential confounding variables. The next step in evaluating time to pregnancy as a reproductive endpoint is to apply it in studies of environmental or occupational exposures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early embryonic mortality in women
Edmonds, D. K., Lindsay, K. S., Miller, J. F., Williamson, E., & Wood, P. J. (1982) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46579-9 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Gnoth, C., Godehardt, E., Frank-Herrmann, P., Friol, K., Tigges, J., & Freundl, G. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh870 · Cited by 603
Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Augood, C., Duckitt, K., & Templeton, A. A. (1998) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/13.6.1532 · Cited by 510
Gesink Law, D. C., Maclehose, R. F., & Longnecker, M. P. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del400 · Cited by 486
Oxidative stress and antioxidants: exposure and impact on female fertility
Ruder, E. H., Hartman, T. J., Blumberg, J., & Goldman, M. B. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn011 · Cited by 351
Slama, R. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.503 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- BAIRD, D. D., WILCOX, A. J., & WEINBERG, C. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-480
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2154494789
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: USE OF TIME TO PREGNANCY TO STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417
- The paper
- BAIRD, D. D., WILCOX, A. J., & WEINBERG, C. R. (1986). USE OF TIME TO PREGNANCY TO STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.