Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS

PIETINEN, PIRJO, HARTMAN, ANNE M., HAAPA, ELIINA, RÄSÄNEN, LEENA, HAAPAKOSKI, JAASON, PALMGREN, JUNI, ALBANES, DEMETRIUS, VIRTAMO, JARMO, HUTTUNEN, JUSSI K.·1988·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

A self-administered food use questionnaire which included 276 food items and mixed dishes and a portion size picture booklet with 122 photographs was developed for a large lung cancer intervention trial among approximately 27,000 Finnish men aged 50-69 years. The reproducibility and validity of this questionnaire were studied from March to October 1984. In the reproducibility study, 121 men aged 55-69 years completed the questionnaire three times, at three-month intervals. The intraclass correlations varied from 0.56 for vitamin A to 0.88 for alcohol, with most falling between 0.60 and 0.70. In the validity study, 190 men of similar age kept food consumption records for 12 two-day periods, distributed evenly over a period of six months, and filled in the questionnaire both before and after this period. Correlations between nutrient intake values from the food records and the food use questionnaires ranged from 0.40 for selenium to 0.80 for alcohol. Among subjects who belonged to the lowest quintile on the basis of the food record measurement, an average of 51 per cent fell into the same quintile and 76 per cent fell into the lowest two quintiles when they were categorized on the basis of the food use questionnaire. Findings were similar for the upper tail of the distribution. These data indicate that the self-administered food use questionnaire is useful for measuring individual or group intakes for a variety of nutrients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
PIETINEN, P., HARTMAN, A. M., HAAPA, E., RÄSÄNEN, L., HAAPAKOSKI, J., PALMGREN, J., ALBANES, D., VIRTAMO, J., & HUTTUNEN, J. K.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1988-09
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
655-666
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1900502813
Cited by
518
References
3
FWCI
13.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115013
The paper
PIETINEN, P., HARTMAN, A. M., HAAPA, E., RÄSÄNEN, L., HAAPAKOSKI, J., PALMGREN, J., ALBANES, D., VIRTAMO, J., & HUTTUNEN, J. K. (1988). REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.