Cited by 9Flowering Plant Growth and CultivationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

Interaction between Hormones, Light, and Nutrition on Extension of Lateral Buds in Phaseolus vulgaris L.

SHEIN, TIN, JACKSON, D. I.·1972·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Gibberellic acid (GA3), kinetin, and indol-3yl-acetic acid (IAA) contained in lanolin were applied in various combinations and concentrations to decapitated stems and petioles and to buds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. GA3 applied alone usually promoted growth of main stems and laterals but this was by no means consistent and occasionally it acted in the opposite way. IAA applied alone reduced lateral bud extension slightly, but not consistently; however, when applied with GA3 or GA3 plus kinetin, it often markedly inhibited the promotion caused by these compounds. On occasions, however, GA3 and IAA acted synergistically to promote and sometimes to inhibit lateral shoot growth. Kinetin alone showed few significant effects on lateral shoot growth but applied with GA3 it often dramatically increased GA3-induced growth of main stems and laterals. The diversity of these results, which parallels that found in the literature, was shown to be partly dependent on the point of hormone application and age of the plant or bud, on concentration of hormone and on light intensity or nutrition. However, no meaningful relationships were found and it is concluded that growth of laterals and main stems is dependent on a hormone balance which can be critically modified by a wide range of internal and external factors the nature of which is still to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084635

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not significantly alter bud outgrowth rate compared with controls.

    “Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) both found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not alter the rate of bud outgrowth signi®cantly compared with controls.”

    From The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (2000) · cites this paper as Shein and Jackson (1972)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHEIN, T., & JACKSON, D. I.
Affiliations
Lincoln University (NZ)
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
1972-09
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
791-800
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2344715901
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
Phaseolus vulgaris, gibberellic acid, kinetin, indole-3-acetic acid, plant hormones, synergistic hormone interaction, light intensity, plant nutrition, decapitation, stem growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review