The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HUMAN OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION AFTER UNILATERAL FRONTAL OR TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY
Abstract
Olfactory discrimination and detection was studied in 106 patients with unilateral cerebral excision in the right or left temporal lobe, right or left frontal lobe, left parietal lobe, or right frontal and temporal lobes, and in 20 normal control subjects. Detection thresholds for n-butyl alcohol, measured separately in each nostril, did not differ across subject groups or across nostrils, thus excluding any primary sensory loss. The discrimination task involved monorhinal presentation of repairs of unfamiliar odorants, which the subjects judged as same or different in quality. The results showed a significant deficit in discrimination confined to the nostril ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with temporal lobe removals. Patients with frontal lobe excisions were also impaired and, for patients with right frontal lesions including the orbital cortex, the impairment was found in both nostrils. Patients with left parietal lesions did not demonstrate any significant deficits. Normal subjects showed consistently better performance in the right than in the left nostril. The results are interpreted as reflecting the importance of the orbitofrontal cortex in olfactory discrimination. Temporal lobe lesions may disrupt the input to the orbitofrontal cortex, thereby producing poorer performance. The nostril difference in the normal subjects, together with the birhinal impairment in patients with right orbitofrontal damage, suggest a relative advantage of the right orbital region in…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From there, serial processing through the primary olfactory cortex and then the orbitofrontal cortex forms a conscious smell image (Tanabe et al., 1975; Zatorre and Jones-Gotman, 1991; Gottfried, 2006, 2007; Shepherd, 2007; Li et al., 2010; Table 1).”
From The evolutionary and genetic origins of consciousness in the Cambrian Period over 500 million years ago (2013) · cites this paper as Zatorre and Jones-Gotman, 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex
Rolls, E. T. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00277-x · Cited by 1,327
The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli
Zald, D. H. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00248-5 · Cited by 1,062
Central mechanisms of odour object perception
Gottfried, J. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2883 · Cited by 549
Functional neuroimaging of the olfactory system in humans
Zald, D. H., & Pardo, J. V. (2000) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00110-5 · Cited by 334
Taste perception in patients with insular cortex lesions
Pritchard, T. C., Macaluso, D. A., & Eslinger, P. J. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.4.663 · Cited by 225
Lateralization of olfactory processes
Royet, J.-P. (2004) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh067 · Cited by 220
Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00667 · Cited by 158
Smythies, J. (1997) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0315 · Cited by 99
Involvement of the left anterior insula and frontopolar gyrus in odor discrimination
Plailly, J., Radnovich, A. J., Sabri, M., Royet, J., & Kareken, D. A. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20290 · Cited by 51
Hernández-González, M., Prieto-Beracoechea, C. A., Arteaga-Silva, M., & Guevara, M. A. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.006 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-02
- ISSN
- 1460-2156
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review