Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implantation: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers

Giorgetti, C., Terriou, P., Auquier, P., Hans, E., Spach, J.-L., Salzmann, J., Roulier, R.·1995·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to devise an embryo score to predict the likelihood of successful implantation after in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Unlike most studies dealing with the influence of embryo stage and morphology on pregnancy, our study was based on single rather than multiple embryo transfers. A total of 957 single embryo transfers were carried out. No delivery was obtained after any of the 99 transfers using 1-cell embryos or embryos obtained after delayed fertilization. In the remaining 858 transfers, the embryos had cleaved. Higher pregnancy rates were obtained with embryos displaying no irregular cells (11.7 versus 6.9%; P < 0.01) and embryos displaying no fragmentation (11.5 versus 8.1%; P < 0.05). The 4-cell embryos implanted 2-fold more often than embryos with more or less cells (15.6 versus 7.4%; P < 0.01). Based on these observations, we devised a 4-point embryo score in which embryos are assigned 1 point each if they (i) are cleaved, (ii) present no fragmentation, (iii) display no irregularities, and (iv) have four cells. Both pregnancy rate and take home baby rate were significantly correlated with embryo score. Each point of this score corresponds to a 4% increase in pregnancy rate. Interestingly, pregnancy rate was significantly lower in women aged > 38 years (8.2 versus 11.4%; P < 0.05), even though embryo quality was similar regardless of age. Single embryo transfer allowed us to define a simple and useful embryo score to choose the best embryo for transfer to optimize IVF and embryo transfer outcome. The use of this embryo score could decrease multiple pregnancies after multiple embryo transfers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Giorgetti, C., Terriou, P., Auquier, P., Hans, E., Spach, J.-L., Salzmann, J., & Roulier, R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
2427-2431
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2001427221
Cited by
386
References
0
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implantation: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312
The paper
Giorgetti, C., Terriou, P., Auquier, P., Hans, E., Spach, J.-L., Salzmann, J., & Roulier, R. (1995). Implantation: Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.