The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE METHODS OF SELECTION*
Abstract
L. N. HAZEL, JAY L. LUSH; THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE METHODS OF SELECTION*, Journal of Heredity, Volume 33, Issue 11, 1 November 1942, Pages 393–399, https://
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects
Wang, X., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., & Xu, C. (2018) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.001 · Cited by 325
On to the next chapter for crop breeding: Convergence with data science
Ersoz, E. S., Martin, N. F., & Stapleton, A. E. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20054 · Cited by 33
Fernandes Filho, C. C., Murad Leite Andrade, M. H., Rodrigues Nunes, J. A., Wipff, J., Hignight, D. L., Rios, E. F., Kenworthy, K., & Hignight, K. (2023) · Grassland Research · doi:10.1002/glr2.12045 · Cited by 5
Somaclonal Variation for the Improvement of Tree Species
Joshi, A., Tripathi, A., Sharma, N., & Tailor, A. (2024) · Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_4 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- HAZEL, L. N., & LUSH, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Heredity
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1942-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 393-399
- ISSN
- 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2287260871
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE METHODS OF SELECTION*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102
- The paper
- HAZEL, L. N., & LUSH, J. L. (1942). THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE METHODS OF SELECTION*. Journal of Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
