The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extent of Gene Duplication in the Genomes of Drosophila, Nematode, and Yeast
Open accessAbstract
We conducted a detailed analysis of duplicate genes in three complete genomes: yeast, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. For two proteins belonging to the same family we used the criteria: (1) their similarity is > or =I (I = 30% if L > or = 150 a.a. and I = 0.01n + 4.8L(-0.32(1 + exp(-L/1000))) if L < 150 a.a., where n = 6 and L is the length of the alignable region), and (2) the length of the alignable region between the two sequences is > or = 80% of the longer protein. We found it very important to delete isoforms (caused by alternative splicing), same genes with different names, and proteins derived from repetitive elements. We estimated that there were 530, 674, and 1,219 protein families in yeast, Drosophila, and C. elegans, respectively, so, as expected, yeast has the smallest number of duplicate genes. However, for the duplicate pairs with the number of substitutions per synonymous site (K(S)) < 0.01, Drosophila has only seven pairs, whereas yeast has 58 pairs and nematode has 153 pairs. After considering the possible effects of codon usage bias and gene conversion, these numbers became 6, 55, and 147, respectively. Thus, Drosophila appears to have much fewer young duplicate genes than do yeast and nematode. The larger numbers of duplicate pairs with K(S) < 0.01 in yeast and C. elegans were probably largely caused by block duplications. At any rate, it is clear that the genome of Drosophila melanogaster has undergone few gene duplications in the recent past and has much fewer gene families than C. elegans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 2×
“Using the BLASTP E value as the sole criterion for identifying homologous proteins, Rubin et al. (2000) studied the extents of gene duplication in yeast, Drosophila, and C. elegans genomes.”
Method
Cited by
Evolution by gene duplication: An update
Zhang, J. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00033-8 · Cited by 2,201
A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function
Costanzo, M., VanderSluis, B., Koch, E. N., Baryshnikova, A., Pons, C., Tan, G., Wang, W., Usaj, M., Hanchard, J., Lee, S. D., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1420 · Cited by 1,240
Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations
Gu, Z., Steinmetz, L. M., Gu, X., Scharfe, C., Davis, R. W., & Li, W.-H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01198 · Cited by 889
Self-citationEvolution of Supergene Families Associated with Insecticide Resistance
Ranson, H., Claudianos, C., Ortelli, F., Abgrall, C., Hemingway, J., Sharakhova, M. V., Unger, M. F., Collins, F. H., & Feyereisen, R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076781 · Cited by 666
Energy Constraints on the Evolution of Gene Expression
Wagner, A. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi126 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, Z., Cavalcanti, A., Chen, F.-C., Bouman, P., & Li, W.-H.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 256-262
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2024172842
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extent of Gene Duplication in the Genomes of Drosophila, Nematode, and Yeast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004079
- The paper
- Gu, Z., Cavalcanti, A., Chen, F.-C., Bouman, P., & Li, W.-H. (2002). Extent of Gene Duplication in the Genomes of Drosophila, Nematode, and Yeast. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.