The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Substitution Rates in Mammalian Genes: Expression Pattern Affects Selection Intensity but Not Mutation Rate
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether gene expression patterns affect mutation rates and/or selection intensity in mammalian genes, we studied the relationships between substitution rates and tissue distribution of gene expression. For this purpose, we analyzed 2,400 human/rodent and 834 mouse/rat orthologous genes, and we measured (using expressed sequence tag data) their expression patterns in 19 tissues from three development states. We show that substitution rates at nonsynonymous sites are strongly negatively correlated with tissue distribution breadth: almost threefold lower in ubiquitous than in tissue-specific genes. Nonsynonymous substitution rates also vary considerably according to the tissues: the average rate is twofold lower in brain-, muscle-, retina- and neuron-specific genes than in lymphocyte-, lung-, and liver-specific genes. Interestingly, 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) show exactly the same trend. These results demonstrate that the expression pattern is an essential factor in determining the selective pressure on functional sites in both coding and noncoding regions. Conversely, silent substitution rates do not vary with expression pattern, even in ubiquitously expressed genes. This latter result thus suggests that synonymous codon usage is not constrained by selection in mammals. Furthermore, this result also indicates that there is no reduction of mutation rates in genes expressed in the germ line, contrary to what had been hypothesized based on the fact that transcribed DNA is more efficiently repaired than nontranscribed DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
The structure of cytochromec and the rates of molecular evolution
Dickerson, R. E. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01659392 · Cited by 544
Duret, L., Dorkeld, F., & Gautier, C. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.10.2315 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Cited by
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly
Drummond, D. A., Bloom, J. D., Adami, C., Wilke, C. O., & Arnold, F. H. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504070102 · Cited by 815
Gene expression across mammalian organ development
Cardoso-Moreira, M., Halbert, J., Valloton, D., Velten, B., Chen, C., Shao, Y., Liechti, A., Ascenção, K., Rummel, C., Ovchinnikova, S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5 · Cited by 838
Highly Expressed Genes in Yeast Evolve Slowly
Pál, C., Papp, B., & Hurst, L. D. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/158.2.927 · Cited by 635
Johnson, M. B., Kawasawa, Y. I., Mason, C. E., Krsnik, Ž., Coppola, G., Bogdanović, D., Geschwind, D. H., Mane, S. M., State, M. W., & Šestan, N. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.027 · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Duret, L., & Mouchiroud, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-070
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2065172786
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Substitution Rates in Mammalian Genes: Expression Pattern Affects Selection Intensity but Not Mutation Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026239
- The paper
- Duret, L., & Mouchiroud, D. (2000). Determinants of Substitution Rates in Mammalian Genes: Expression Pattern Affects Selection Intensity but Not Mutation Rate. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.