Cited by 838Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Gene expression across mammalian organ development

Open access
Cardoso-Moreira, Margarida, Halbert, Jean, Valloton, Delphine, Velten, Britta, Chen, Chunyan, Shao, Yi, Liechti, Angélica, Ascenção, Kelly +25 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

The evolution of gene expression in mammalian organ development remains largely uncharacterized. Here we report the transcriptomes of seven organs (cerebrum, cerebellum, heart, kidney, liver, ovary and testis) across developmental time points from early organogenesis to adulthood for human, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, rabbit, opossum and chicken. Comparisons of gene expression patterns identified correspondences of developmental stages across species, and differences in the timing of key events during the development of the gonads. We found that the breadth of gene expression and the extent of purifying selection gradually decrease during development, whereas the amount of positive selection and expression of new genes increase. We identified differences in the temporal trajectories of expression of individual genes across species, with brain tissues showing the smallest percentage of trajectory changes, and the liver and testis showing the largest. Our work provides a resource of developmental transcriptomes of seven organs across seven species, and comparative analyses that characterize the development and evolution of mammalian organs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 77% (17/22) of heart, brain and liver candidates were expressed at high levels throughout development.

    “77% (17/22) of heart, brain and liver candidates were expressed at high levels throughout development17”

    From Active repression of cell fate plasticity by PROX1 safeguards hepatocyte identity and prevents liver tumorigenesis (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Organ developmental transcriptomes section and Extended Data Figure 1 discuss expression across development in organs including the heart, brain and liver, but neither reports a set of 22 candidates or says that 17 were highly expressed throughout development. Searches for “17/22,” “17 of 22,” “77%,” and candidate genes found no passage establishing the claimed result. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. [1]Pantalacci S Semon M Transcriptomics of Developing Embryos and Organs: A Raising Tool for Evo–Devo J Exp Zool 2014 00B 1 9 25387424
  2. [2]Silbereis JC Pochareddy S Zhu Y Li M Sestan N The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System Neuron 2016 89 248 2680 26796689 PMC4959909
  3. [3]DeFalco T Capel B Gonad morphogenesis in vertebrates: divergent means to a convergent end Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009 25 457 482 19807280 PMC4507502
  4. [4]Abzhanov A von Baer's law for the ages: lost and found principles of developmental evolution Trends Genet 2013 29 712 722 24120296
  5. [5]Kalinka AT Tomancak P The evolution of early animal embryos: conservation or divergence? Trends Ecol Evol 2012 27 385 393 22520868
  6. [6]Ferner K Schultz JA Zeller U Comparative anatomy of neonates of the three major mammalian groups (monotremes, marsupials, placentals) and implications for the ancestral mammalian neonate morphotype J Anat 2017 231 798 822 28960296 PMC5696127
  7. [9]Lek M Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans Nature 2016 536 285 91 27535533 PMC5018207
  8. [10]Cassa CA Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data Nat Genet 2017 49 806 810 28369035 PMC5618255
  9. [11]Ruderfer DM Patterns of genic intolerance of rare copy number variation in 59,898 human exomes Nat Genet 2016 48 1107 1111 27533299 PMC5042837
  10. [13]de Bakker BS An interactive three-dimensional digital atlas and quantitative database of human development Science 2016 354 27884980
  11. [14]Kerwin J The HUDSEN Atlas: a three-dimensional (3D) spatial framework for studying gene expression in the developing human brain J Anat 2010 217 289 299 20979583 PMC2967454
  12. [15]Butler H Juurlink BHJ An Atlas for Staging Mammalian and Chick Embryos CRC Press Boca Raton, Fla 1987
  13. [16]Smith KK Early development of the neural plate, neural crest and facial region of marsupials J Anat 2001 199 121 131 11523813 PMC1594995
  14. [17]Dillman AA mRNA expression, splicing and editing in the embryonic and adult mouse cerebral cortex Nat Neurosci 2013 16 499 506 23416452 PMC3609882
  15. [18]Glucksmann A Sexual dimorphism in mammals Biol Rev 1974 49 423 475 4616731
  16. [19]Feng CW Bowles J Koopman P Control of mammalian germ cell entry into meiosis Mol Cell Endocrinol 2014 382 488 497 24076097
  17. [20]Soumillon M Cellular source and mechanisms of high transcriptome complexity in the mammalian testis Cell Rep 2013 3 2179 2190 23791531
  18. [21]Ungewitter EK Yao HH How to make a gonad: cellular mechanisms governing formation of the testes and ovaries Sex Dev 2013 7 7 20 22614391 PMC3474884
  19. [22]Roux J Robinson-Rechavi M Developmental Constraints on Vertebrate Genome Evolution PLoS Genet 2008 4 10 PMC2600815 19096706
  20. [23]Kalinka AT Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model Nature 2010 468 811 814 21150996
  21. [24]Hu H Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes Nat Ecol Evol 2017 1 1722 1730 28963548
  22. [25]Hazkani-Covo E Wool D Graur D In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2005 304 150 8 15779077
  23. [26]Garfield DA Wray GA Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development J Biol 2009 8 65 19664180 PMC2736668
  24. [27]Koscielny G The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Web Portal, a unified point of access for knockout mice and related phenotyping data Nucleic Acids Res 2014 42 D802 9 24194600 PMC3964955
  25. [29]Kaessmann H Origins, evolution, and phenotypic impact of new genes Genome Res 2010 20 1313 1326 20651121 PMC2945180
  26. [30]Stern DL Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation Evolution 2000 54 1079 91 11005278
  27. [32]Duret L Mouchiroud D Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate Mol Biol Evol 2000 17 68 74 10666707
  28. [33]Winter E Goodstadt L Ponting CP Elevated Rates of Protein Secretion, Evolution, and Disease Among Tissue-Specific Genes Genome Res 2004 14 54 61 14707169 PMC314278
  29. [34]Galis F Metz J Testing the Vulnerability of the Phylotypic Stage: On Modularity and Evolutionary Conservation Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol) 2001 291 195 204 11479918
  30. [35]Sears K Maier JA Sadier A Sorensen D Urban DJ Timing the developmental origins of mammalian limb diversity Genesis 2018 56 29095555
  31. [36]Plant TM Ramaswamy S Simorangkir D Marshall GR Postnatal and pubertal development of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) testis Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005 1061 149 162 16467264
  32. [37]Bruneau BG Signaling and transcriptional networks in heart development and regeneration Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013 5 a008292 23457256 PMC3578359
  33. [38]Carelli FN Liechti A Halbert J Warnefors M Kaessmann H Repurposing of promoters and enhancers during mammalian evolution Nat Commun 2018 9 4066 30287902 PMC6172195
  34. [39]Marin R Convergent origination of a Drosophila-like dosage compensation mechanism in a reptile lineage Genome Res 2017 27 1974 1987 29133310 PMC5741051
  35. [40]Wu TD Nacu S Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads Bioinformatics 2010 26 873 881 20147302 PMC2844994
  36. [41]Anders S Pyl PT Huber W HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data Bioinformatics 2015 31 166 169 25260700 PMC4287950
  37. [42]Robinson MD McCarthy DJ Smyth GK edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data Bioinformatics 2010 26 139 140 19910308 PMC2796818
  38. [47]Anavy L BLIND ordering of large-scale transcriptomic developmental timecourses Development 2014 141 1161 6 24504336
  39. [50]Nueda MJ Tarazona S Conesa A Next maSigPro: updating maSigPro bioconductor package for RNA-seq time series Bioinformatics 2014 30 2598 2602 24894503 PMC4155246
  40. [51]Conesa A Nueda MJ Ferrer A Talon M maSigPro: a method to identify significantly differential expression profiles in time-course microarray experiments Bioinformatics 2006 22 1096 1102 16481333
  41. [52]Zhang HM AnimalTFDB 2.0: a resource for expression, prediction and functional study of animal transcription factors Nucleic Acids Res 2015 43 D76 81 25262351 PMC4384004
  42. [55]Smith KK Craniofacial development in marsupial mammals: developmental origins of evolutionary change Dev Dyn 2006 235 1181 1193 16408286
  43. [56]Futschik ME Carlisle B Noise-robust soft clustering of gene expression time-course data J Bioinform Computat Biol 2005 3 965 988 16078370
  44. [57]Kumar L Futschik M Mfuzz: A software package for soft clustering of microarray data Bioinformation 2007 2 5 7 18084642 PMC2139991
  45. [58]Eisenberg E Levanon EY Human housekeeping genes, revisited Trends Genet 2013 29 569 574 23810203
  46. [59]Domazet-Loso T Tautz D A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns Nature 2010 468 815 818 21150997
  47. [60]Zhang YE Vibranovski MD Landback P Marais GA Long M Chromosomal redistribution of male-biased genes in mammalian evolution with two bursts of gene gain on the X chromosome PLoS Biol 2010 8 e1000494 20957185 PMC2950125
  48. [61]Yanai I Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification Bioinformatics 2005 21 650 9 15388519
  49. [62]Hensman J Lawrence ND Rattray M Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of gene expression time series across irregularly sampled replicates and clusters BMC Bioinformatics 2013 14 252 23962281 PMC3766667
  50. [63]Hensman J Rattray M Lawrence ND Fast Nonparametric Clustering of Structured Time-Series IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2015 37 383 393 26353249
  51. [64]Hensman J Rattray M Lawrence ND Fast Variational Inference in the Conjugate Exponential Family Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 2014
  52. [65]Kumar S Stecher G Suleski M Hedges SB TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times Mol Biol Evol 2017 34 1812 1819 28387841
  53. [66]Vickaryous MK Hall BK Human cell type diversity, evolution, development, and classification with special reference to cells derived from the neural crest Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2006 81 425 455 16790079
  54. [67]Wickham H ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis Springer-Verlag New York 2009
  55. [72]Wang J Vasaikar S Shi Z Greer M Zhang B WebGestalt 2017: a more comprehensive, powerful, flexible and interactive gene set enrichment analysis toolkit Nucleic Acids Res 2017 45 W130 37 28472511 PMC5570149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoso-Moreira, M., Halbert, J., Valloton, D., Velten, B., Chen, C., Shao, Y., Liechti, A., Ascenção, K., Rummel, C., Ovchinnikova, S., Mazin, P. V., Xenarios, I., Harshman, K., Mort, M., Cooper, D. N., Sandi, C., Soares, M. J., Ferreira, P. G., Afonso, S., Carneiro, M., Turner, J. M. A., VandeBerg, J. L., Fallahshahroudi, A., Jensen, P., Behr, R., Lisgo, S., Lindsay, S., Khaitovich, P., Huber, W., Baker, J., Anders, S., Zhang, Y. E., & Kaessmann, H.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Children’s Mercy Research Institute (US)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
  • The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • German Primate Center (DE)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cardoso-Moreira, Margarida
  • Kaessmann, Henrik
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-06-26
Volume
571
Issue
7766
Pages
505-509
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2954492537
Cited by
838
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
28.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Francis Crick Institute (10193)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (146474)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R006237/1)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES029280)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD099638, P01HD079363, R01HD020676)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
organogenesis, developmental transcriptome, gene expression evolution, purifying selection, positive selection, de novo genes, developmental trajectories, comparative genomics, brain development, gonad development, heart development, kidney development, liver development, ovarian development, testicular development, mammalian evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Opossums, Rabbits, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Organogenesis, Mice, Rats, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review