The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster.
Open accessAbstract
Begun and Aquadro have demonstrated that levels of nucleotide variation correlate with recombination rate among 20 gene regions from across the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. It has been suggested that this correlation results from genetic hitchhiking associated with the fixation of strongly selected mutants. The hitchhiking process can be described as a series of two-step events. The first step consists of a strongly selected substitution wiping out linked variation in a population; this is followed by a recovery period in which polymorphism can build up via neutral mutations and random genetic drift. Genetic hitchhiking has previously been modeled as a steady-state process driven by recurring selected substitutions. We show here that the characteristic parameter of this steady-state model is alpha v, the product of selection intensity (alpha = 2Ns) and the frequency of beneficial mutations v (where N is population size and s is the selective advantage of the favored allele). We also demonstrate that the steady-state model describes the hitchhiking process adequately, unless the recombination rate is very low. To estimate alpha v, we use the data of DNA sequence variation from 17 D. melanogaster loci from regions of intermediate to high recombination rates. We find that alpha v is likely to be > 1.3 x 10(-8). Additional data are needed to estimate this parameter more precisely. The estimation of alpha v is important, as this parameter determines the shape of the frequency distribution of strongly selected substitutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detecting a Local Signature of Genetic Hitchhiking Along a Recombining Chromosome
Kim, Y., & Stephan, W. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.2.765 · Cited by 631
The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms
Braverman, J. M., Hudson, R. R., Kaplan, N. L., Langley, C. H., & Stephan, W. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/140.2.783 · Cited by 601
Prediction and estimation of effective population size
Wang, J., Santiago, E., & Caballero, A. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.43 · Cited by 401
The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants
Charlesworth, B. (1994) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300032365 · Cited by 366
The genomic rate of adaptive evolution
EYREWALKER, A. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.015 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 842-54
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2282363677
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040046
- The paper
- Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster. (1993). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.