The DOI matches its Crossref record.
"Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons.
Open accessAbstract
The patterns of synonymous codon usage in 91 Drosophila melanogaster genes have been examined. Codon usage varies strikingly among genes. This variation is associated with differences in G+C content at silent sites, but (unlike the situation in mammalian genes) these differences are not correlated with variation in intron base composition and so are not easily explicable in terms of mutational biases. Instead, those genes with high G+C content at silent sites, resulting from a strong "preference" for a particular subset of the codons that are mostly C-ending, appear to be the more highly expressed genes. This suggests that G+C content is reduced in sequences where selective constraints are weaker, as indeed seen in a pseudogene. These and other data discussed are consistent with the effects of translational selection among synonymous codons, as seen in unicellular organisms. The existence of selective constraints on silent substitutions, which may vary in strength among genes, has implications for the use of silent molecular clocks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: Natural selection and translational accuracy
Akashi, H. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.3.927 · Cited by 742
Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes
Duret, L., & Galtier, N. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001 · Cited by 737
Temporal Patterns of Fruit Fly (Drosophila) Evolution Revealed by Mutation Clocks
Tamura, K. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg236 · Cited by 586
High Guanine and Cytosine Content Increases mRNA Levels in Mammalian Cells
Kudla, G., Lipinski, L., Caffin, F., Helwak, A., & Zylicz, M. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040180 · Cited by 476
Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons
Sueoka, N. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00163236 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 704-16
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W1878315031
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525
- The paper
- "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. (1988). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.