The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MIS-SPECIFICATION IN FARM PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS: THE ROLE OF LAND QUALITY
Abstract
* The Policy Group. This paper was written while the authors were at the World Bank and Delhi School of Economics, respectively. We would like to thank T. N. Srinivasan and Sanjiv Kumar for very useful suggestions on an earlier draft dated Nov. 1983. Our thanks to Julie Nelson and Kenneth Boese for patient and excellent research assistance. We would also like to thank two anonymous referees for their useful comments. The views expressed in this paper are the authors and not those of the institution to which they belong
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Peasant Economy.
Dobb, M., Chayanov, A. V., Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., & Smith, R. E. F. (1968) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2229509 · Cited by 1,439
Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labor
Sen, A. K. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259198 · Cited by 706
Employment Technology and Development.
Stewart, F., & Sen, A. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230983 · Cited by 423
Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries
Crosson, P., Berry, R. A., & Cline, W. R. (1980) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146229 · Cited by 409
CARTER, M. R. (1984) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041621 · Cited by 407
Size, Productivity, and Returns to Scale: An Analysis of Farm-Level Data in Indian Agriculture
Bardhan, P. K. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260132 · Cited by 383
An Aspect of Indian Agriculture
Sen, A. K. (1962) · Cited by 342
The Political Economy of Agrarian Change: An Essay on the Green Revolution
Griffin, K. B. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 187
The Measurement of Permanent Income and Its Application to Savings Behavior
Bhalla, S. S. (1980) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260899 · Cited by 129
Self-citationContributions to Indian Economic Analysis: A Survey
Bhagwati, J. N., & Chakravarty, S. (1969) · eYLS (Yale Law School) · doi:10.7916/d84x5jht · Cited by 116
Cited by
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis
Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4 · Cited by 474
The Evolution of the World Bank's Land Policy: Principles, Experience, and Future Challenges
Deinlnger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/14.2.247 · Cited by 444
On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship
Barrett, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00412-9 · Cited by 408
Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity–Size Relationship
Barrett, C. B., Bellemare, M. F., & Hou, J. Y. (2010) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.002 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- BHALLA, S. S., & ROY, P.
- Venue
- Oxford Economic Papers
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-73
- ISSN
- 0030-7653 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3812
- OpenAlex
- W1863908556
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MIS-SPECIFICATION IN FARM PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS: THE ROLE OF LAND QUALITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041846
- The paper
- BHALLA, S. S., & ROY, P. (1988). MIS-SPECIFICATION IN FARM PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS: THE ROLE OF LAND QUALITY. Oxford Economic Papers. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.