Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coronary heart disease: a review of the role of psychosocial stress and social support

Greenwood, D. C., Muir, K. R., Packham, C. J., Madeley, R. J.·1996·Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of psychosocial factors in the aetiology of coronary heart disease continues to be debated. Despite public perception of a major role for their effect, scientific opinion on their relevance remains divided. This paper reviews the literature on the influence of social support and life stress on coronary heart disease incidence and mortality. METHODS: Observational studies published in English, based on over 100 human subjects from the general population, investigating life stress or social support were considered. Fourteen studies derived from MEDLINE searches on MeSH headings: coronary disease; stress, psychological; social support; social isolation; life change events. An equivalent search of BIDS and studies referenced by papers identified using these sources was carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The review concludes that both life stress and social support were found to have an influence on coronary heart disease, social support more so than stress. Both have a stronger influence on coronary heart disease mortality than on initial incidence of clinical disease. Measures of the quality of support, in particular emotion support, show the largest effects. The review highlights problems in drawing conclusions from the available literature; in particular, the inconsistency in measures used to define the psychosocial factors. Further studies are needed to investigate interrelationships between stress and social support, and a recommendation is made to adopt pragmatic measures in future studies, which if proven to have an effect, may be open to modification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024483

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Greenwood, D. C., Muir, K. R., Packham, C. J., & Madeley, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
1996-06-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
221-231
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3842
  • 1741-3850
OpenAlex
W2148607371
Cited by
208
References
6
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary heart disease: a review of the role of psychosocial stress and social support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024483
The paper
Greenwood, D. C., Muir, K. R., Packham, C. J., & Madeley, R. J. (1996). Coronary heart disease: a review of the role of psychosocial stress and social support. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024483

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.