Cited by 345Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyStress Responses and Cortisol

Rearing effects on cerebrospinal fluid oxytocin concentration and social buffering in rhesus monkeys

Winslow, James T, Noble, Pamela L, Lyons, Casie K, Sterk, Sheila M, Insel, Thomas R·2003·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Mother-reared (MR) and nursery-reared (NR) male rhesus monkeys exhibit profound and persistent differences in social and emotional behavior. Compared to MR animals, NR monkeys show reduced reciprocal social behaviors and increased agonistic behavior and high levels of stereotypy. Cerebrospinal fluid oxytocin (CSF OT) in NR monkeys was significantly reduced compared to MR monkeys measured at 18, 24, and 36 months of age. Correlations between OT and individual social behavioral profiles measured across rearing conditions also revealed a significant association between OT and the expression of affiliative social behaviors including allogrooming and reciprocal intermale mounting at each age examined. In contrast, CSF vasopressin levels did not differ according to rearing history, but did correlate with fearful behaviors independent of rearing history. Differential rearing was not associated with differences in basal or stress-related plasma cortisol, although these levels did progressively decline as monkeys matured. MR but not NR monkeys were able to use a social companion to buffer their response to a stressor, but OT levels did not appear to be sensitive to the presence of a social companion in either group. These results are consistent with earlier reports from studies of rodents suggesting an important role for central OT pathways in the development of social affiliation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300128

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winslow, J. T., Noble, P. L., Lyons, C. K., Sterk, S. M., & Insel, T. R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Winslow, James T
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2002-12-19
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
910-918
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2120350428
Cited by
345
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9876754)
  • Emory University
  • National Institutes of Health (RR‐00165)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 57704, P50MH058922, MH58922, R01MH057704)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
social buffering, rhesus monkeys, nursery rearing, vasopressin, cortisol, allogrooming, agonistic behavior, stereotypy, social development (developmental psychology), stress response
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca mulatta, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Oxytocin, Social Behavior, Stress, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review