Cited by 644Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

Stress, Life Events, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health: Results from the Americans' Changing Lives Study

Lantz, Paula M., House, James S., Mero, Richard P., Williams, David R.·2005·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that exposure to stress and negative life events is related to poor health outcomes, and that differential exposure to stress plays a role in socioeconomic disparities in health. Data from three waves of the Americans' Changing Lives study (n = 3,617) were analyzed to investigate prospectively the relationship among socioeconomic indicators, five measures of stress/negative life events, and the health outcomes of mortality, functional limitations, and self-rated health. The results revealed that (1) life events and other types of stressors are clearly related to socioeconomic position; (2) a count of negative lifetime events was positively associated with mortality; (3) a higher score on a financial stress scale was predictive of severe/moderate functional limitations and fair/poor self-rated health at wave 3; and (4) a higher score on a parental stress scale was predictive of fair/poor self-rated health at wave 3. The negative effects of low income on functional limitations attenuated to insignificance when waves 1 and 2 stress/life event measures were controlled for, but other socioeconomic disparities in health change remained sizable and significant when adjusted for exposure to stressors. The results support the hypothesis that differential exposure to stress and negative life events is one of many ways in which socioeconomic inequalities in health are produced in society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002214650504600305

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lantz, P. M., House, J. S., Mero, R. P., & Williams, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Lantz, Paula M.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2005-09
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
274-288
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W2166777945
Cited by
644
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 33
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG018418)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
stress, negative life events, socioeconomic inequalities in health, financial stress, parental stress, mortality, functional limitations, self-rated health, low income, Americans' Changing Lives Study, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Social Class, Stress, Psychological, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review