Cited by 345Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySex work and related issues

Efficacy of psychological interventions for sexual dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Frühauf, Sarah, Gerger, Heike, Schmidt, Hannah Maren, Munder, Thomas, Barth, Jürgen·2013·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in the general population and associated with psychological distress and impaired sexual satisfaction. Psychological interventions are promising treatment options, as sexual dysfunction is frequently caused by and deteriorates because of psychological factors. However, research into the efficacy of psychological interventions is rather scarce and an up-to-date review of outcome studies is currently lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies from 1980 to 2009 to examine the efficacy of psychological interventions for patients with sexual dysfunction. A total of 20 randomized controlled studies comparing a psychological intervention with a wait-list were included in the meta-analysis. The overall post-treatment effect size for symptom severity was d = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.77) and for sexual satisfaction d = 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27 to 0.70). Psychological interventions were shown to especially improve symptom severity for women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder and orgasmic disorder. Our systematic review of 14 studies comparing at least two active interventions head-to-head revealed that very few comparative studies are available with large variability in effect sizes across studies (d between -0.69 and 2.29 for symptom severity and -0.56 and 14.02 for sexual satisfaction). In conclusion, psychological interventions are effective treatment options for sexual dysfunction. However, evidence varies considerably across single disorders. Good evidence exists to date for female hypoactive sexual desire disorder and female orgasmic disorder. Further research is needed on psychological interventions for other sexual dysfunctions, their long-term and comparative effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-012-0062-0

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A multidisciplinary treatment combining medical and psychological treatment is more effective than mono-treatment.

    “Statement #9: A multidisciplinary treatment, in which medical treatment is combined with psychological treatment, has proven to be more effective than mono-treatment (Level 2, Grade B).”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results of Studies Included in the Systematic Review report that combined psychological treatment and medication was more effective than medication alone in several comparisons. But for erectile dysfunction, one study found the opposite effect, and the paper did not pool the combined-treatment comparisons. The evidence therefore does not establish that combined treatment is generally more effective than any single treatment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Available studies on the effectiveness of psychological treatments are limited and hampered by small sample sizes, inadequate follow-up, and a lack of controlled designs.

    “In addition, available studies on the effectiveness of psychological treatments are limited and hampered by small samples sizes, inadequate follow-up, and a lack of controlled designs.106, 107, 108”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Banner, L. L. (2001). The effects of collaborative care in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED): An integrative treatment protocol (ITP). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute.
  2. Ravart, M., Trudel, G., Marchand, A., Turgeon, L., & Aubin, S. (1996). The efficacy of a cognitive behavioural treatment model for hypo- active sexual desire disorder: An outcome study. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 279-293.
  3. Yuan, P., Dai, J., Yang, Y., Guo, J., & Liang, R. (2008). A comparative study on treatment for premature ejaculation: Citalopram used in combination with behavioral therapy versus either Citalopram or behavioral therapy alone. Chinese Journal of Andrology, 5, 35-38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frühauf, S., Gerger, H., Schmidt, H. M., Munder, T., & Barth, J.
Affiliations
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Corresponding author
Barth, Jürgen
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
915-933
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2029534437
Cited by
345
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (118312, 105314-118312/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, psychological intervention, treatment efficacy, sexual satisfaction, hypoactive sexual desire disorder, female orgasmic disorder, symptom severity, psychological distress
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Treatment Outcome, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review