Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Echocardiography in chronic heart failure in the community

N.M. WHEELDON, Thomas MacLennan MacDonald, C.J. FLUCKER, A. D. McKendrick, Denis G. McDevitt, Allan D. Struthers·1993·QJM

Abstract

A total of 128 patients from a single practice population who were receiving loop diuretics for treatment of presumptive cardiac failure were identified from prescribing data captured by the Medicines Monitoring Unit. A subgroup of 78 patients underwent echocardiography to determine the prevalence of true left ventricular systolic dysfunction in this population and the validity of the diagnosis of cardiac failure in primary care. A further 50 patients were studied to assess the workload generated by these patients for both primary health care and hospital services. The estimated prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction was 0.84%, whereas 1.6% of the population received loop diuretics for this indication. A false-positive diagnosis occurred in 47% and was more likely in females (73%) than males (37%). Of all consultations 79% were seen by GPs, 14% as hospital out-patients and 7% as in-patients. Within the hospital general physicians have most contact with these patients. In summary chronic heart failure is common within the community, although the false-positive rate for diagnosis of this condition is high. GPs and general physicians treat the majority of these patients and should therefore receive continuing education regarding recent advances in this area. Echocardiography should be performed early in the management of all patients suspected of having cardiac failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a068731

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
WHEELDON, N. M., MacDonald, T. M., FLUCKER, C. J., McKendrick, A. D., McDevitt, D. G., & Struthers, A. D.
Venue
QJM
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136036216
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.