The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The "Close-in" or Ultra High-Risk Model: A Safe and Effective Strategy for Research and Clinical Intervention in Prepsychotic Mental Disorder
Open accessAbstract
The development of a new frontier for research and early intervention in psychotic disorders is highly dependent on the construction of synergistic clinical infrastructures. This has catalyzed great progress in the recognition, enhanced treatment, and study of first episode psychosis, and the task is even more challenging when the boundaries are extended to include the earliest clinical phase of illness, the prodromal or prepsychotic phase. This article describes the conceptual and practical building blocks for the construction of service models for intervention in the postonset clinical phase prior to the attainment of current diagnostic thresholds. This is best regarded as indicated prevention, a form of very early secondary prevention, which involves a blend of immediate clinical care combined with research-oriented preventive intervention. The experience of the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation (PACE) Clinic in Melbourne across several stages of growth is described and contrasted with that of several emerging centers in Europe and North America. The progress to date, the lessons learned, and the unresolved challenges and opportunities are detailed. It is concluded that service models can be developed that are acceptable and helpful to young people and their families, and that create a unique environment for the study of the transition to frank psychotic disorder. The ultimate clinical utility and general safety of this approach and the range of effective treatments remain unclear, and will be determined by more extensive research. Such research must be conducted in a logical and rigorous manner with the best designs possible, sensitive to input from consumers and caregivers and to ethical considerations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
(1994) · doi:10.17226/2139 · Cited by 2,073
Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk ("prodromal") group
Yung, A. R., Phillips, L. J., Yuen, H. P., Francey, S. M., McFarlane, C. A., Hallgren, M., & McGorry, P. D. (2003) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00167-6 · Cited by 1,136
Self-citationMcGorry, P. D., Yung, A. R., Phillips, L. J., Yuen, H. P., Francey, S., Cosgrave, E. M., Germano, D., Bravin, J., McDonald, T., Blair, A., et al. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.921 · Cited by 1,056
Self-citationThe stress cascade and schizophrenia: Etiology and onset
Corcoran, C., Walker, E., Huot, R., Mittal, V., Tessner, K., Kestler, L., & Malaspina, D. (2003) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007038 · Cited by 439
Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at risk mental states (CAARMS)
Yung, A. R., Yuen, H. P., Phillips, L. J., Francey, S., & McGorry, P. D. (2003) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(03)80090-7 · Cited by 84 · cited 5×
“False positives cannot be distinguished from false false positives (Yung et al. 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBreitborde, N. J., Moreno, F. A., Mai-Dixon, N., Peterson, R., Durst, L., Bernstein, B., Byreddy, S., & McFarlane, W. R. (2011) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-11-9 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Cannon, T. D., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S. W., Addington, J., Walker, E., Seidman, L. J., Perkins, D., Tsuang, M., McGlashan, T., et al. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.3 · Cited by 1,269
McGorry, P. D., Hickie, I. B., Yung, A. R., Pantelis, C., & Jackson, H. J. (2006) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01860.x · Cited by 919
Self-citationEarly intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence and future directions
MCGORRY, P. D., KILLACKEY, E., & YUNG, A. (2008) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00182.x · Cited by 581
Self-citationMcGorry, P. D., Nelson, B., Markulev, C., Yuen, H. P., Schäfer, M. R., Mossaheb, N., Schlögelhofer, M., Smesny, S., Hickie, I. B., Berger, G. E., et al. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2902 · Cited by 262
Self-citationPreventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodromal states
Bechdolf, A., Wagner, M., Ruhrmann, S., Harrigan, S., Putzfeld, V., Pukrop, R., Brockhaus-Dumke, A., Berning, J., Janssen, B., Decker, P., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066357 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- McGorry, P. D., Yung, A. R., & Phillips, L. J.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-790
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2110959633
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The "Close-in" or Ultra High-Risk Model: A Safe and Effective Strategy for Research and Clinical Intervention in Prepsychotic Mental Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007046
- The paper
- McGorry, P. D., Yung, A. R., & Phillips, L. J. (2003). The "Close-in" or Ultra High-Risk Model: A Safe and Effective Strategy for Research and Clinical Intervention in Prepsychotic Mental Disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
