Cited by 45Schizophrenia research and treatmentFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Multifamily Group Psychoeducation and Cognitive Remediation for First-Episode Psychosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Breitborde, Nicholas JK, Moreno, Francisco A, Mai-Dixon, Natalie, Peterson, Rachele, Durst, Linda, Bernstein, Beth, Byreddy, Seenaiah, McFarlane, William R·2011·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multifamily group psychoeducation (MFG) has been shown to reduce relapse rates among individuals with first-episode psychosis. However, given the cognitive demands associated with participating in this intervention (e.g., learning and applying a structured problem-solving activity), the cognitive deficits that accompany psychotic disorders may limit the ability of certain individuals to benefit from this intervention. Thus, the goal of this study is to examine whether individuals with first-episode psychosis who participate simultaneously in MFG and cognitive remediation--an intervention shown to improve cognitive functioning among individuals with psychotic disorders--will be less likely to experience a relapse than individuals who participate in MFG alone. METHODS/DESIGN: Forty individuals with first-episode psychosis and their caregiving relative will be recruited to participate in this study. Individuals with first-episode psychosis will be randomized to one of two conditions: (i) MFG with concurrent participation in cognitive remediation or (ii) MFG alone. The primary outcome for this study is relapse of psychotic symptoms. We will also examine secondary outcomes among both individuals with first-episode psychosis (i.e., social and vocational functioning, health-related quality of life, service utilization, independent living status, and cognitive functioning) and their caregiving relatives (i.e., caregiver burden, anxiety, and depression) DISCUSSION: Cognitive remediation offers the possibility of ameliorating a specific deficit (i.e., deficits in cognitive functioning) that often accompanies psychotic symptoms and may restrict the magnitude of the clinical benefits derived from MFG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT01196286.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-11-9

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only Breitborde et al. (2011) have proposed evaluating outcomes of multifamily psychoeducation groups on anxiety and depression of family caregivers, but there are no reports yet.

    “Sólo Breitborde et al. (2011) han planteado evaluar los resultados de los grupos de psicoeducación multifamiliar en la ansiedad y la depresión de los familiares cuidadores, pero aún no hay informes al respecto.”

    From Intervención psicológica grupal, basada en la aceptación y el entrenamiento en comunicación, con familiares de personas con trastorno mental grave (2015) · cites this paper as Breitborde et al., 2011

    The Methods/Design section proposes measuring caregivers’ depression and anxiety after multifamily group participation, and the paper reports no results from that planned analysis. It does not establish that Breitborde et al. were the only researchers to propose such an evaluation; the same section cites earlier research on caregiver distress after family psychoeducation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. McGlashan TH A selective review of recent North American follow-up studies on schizophrenia Schizophrenia Bulletin 1998 14 515 542 3064280
  2. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition with Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P W/PSY SCREEN) 2002 New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  3. Perkins DO Leserman J Jarskog LF Graham K Kazmer J Lieberman JA Characterizing and dating the onset of symptoms in psychotic illness Schizophrenia Research 2002 44 1 10 10867307
  4. Hays RD Sherbourne CD Mazel RM The RAND 36-Item Health Survey Health Economics 1993 2 217 227 8275167

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breitborde, N. J., Moreno, F. A., Mai-Dixon, N., Peterson, R., Durst, L., Bernstein, B., Byreddy, S., & McFarlane, W. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Maine Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Breitborde, Nicholas JK
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2011-01-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
9-9
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068902942
Cited by
45
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Arizona
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, cognitive remediation, relapse prevention, cognitive impairment, caregivers, caregiver burden, social functioning, vocational functioning, health-related quality of life, independent living, service utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Clinical Protocols, Cognition Disorders, Family Therapy, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotic Disorders, Research Design, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review