The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks
Abstract
Despite the desire to focus on the interconnected nature of politics and economics at the global scale, most empirical studies in the field of international relations assume not only that the major actors are sovereign, but also that their relationships are portrayed in data that are modeled as independent phenomena. In contrast, this article illustrates the use of linear and bilinear random—effects models to represent statistical dependencies that often characterize dyadic data such as international relations. In particular, we show how to estimate models for dyadic data that simultaneously take into account: (a) regressor variables, (b) correlation of actions having the same actor, (c) correlation of actions having the same target, (d) correlation of actions between a pair of actors (i.e., reciprocity of actions), and (e) third-order dependencies, such as transitivity, clustering, and balance. We apply this new approach to the political relations among a wide range of political actors in Central Asia over the period 1989–1999, illustrating the presence and strength of second- and third-order statistical dependencies in these data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Cited by
Network Analysis for International Relations
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309090195 · Cited by 1,008
MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R
Martin, A. D., Quinn, K. M., & Park, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i09 · Cited by 608
An Empirical Evaluation of Explanations for State Repression
HILL, D. W., & JONES, Z. M. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000306 · Cited by 450
How Robust Standard Errors Expose Methodological Problems They Do Not Fix, and What to Do About It
King, G., & Roberts, M. E. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu015 · Cited by 299
Muchlinski, D., Siroky, D., He, J., & Kocher, M. (2016) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpv024 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D.
- Venue
- Political Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-175
- ISSN
- 1047-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4989
- OpenAlex
- W2151183372
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pan/mph012
- The paper
- Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D. (2004). Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks. Political Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.