Cited by 22Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHealth and Medical Research ImpactsResearch, Science, and Academia

Funding Priorities: Autism and the Need for a More Balanced Research Agenda in Canada

Krahn, T. M., Fenton, A.·2012·Public Health Ethics

Abstract

The public purse is responsible for funding almost all autism spectrum disorders (ASD) research in Canada (as per Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR]) and for providing some of the existing services and supports for this population. In this article, we consider various reasons why Canada should be concerned to ensure a more equitable distribution of relevant public funding for ASD research than is currently the case to meet the express needs and interests of the diversity of autism stakeholders. As such, we report data to show that CIHR-supported ASD research from the period of 2000–2010 demonstrates a bias focussed on the aetiology of the condition revealing a disproportionate emphasis on only two (Biomedical and Clinical) out of the four research pillars avowed by CIHR, with a comparative lack of fiscal resources committed to Health Systems and Services and Population and Public Health research. We advance certain normative and prudential reasons for funding more Health Systems and Services and Population and Public Health ASD research in Canada. In our view, this would seem to follow from CIHR’s official mandate ‘as a flexible mechanism that will continually align health research funding with changes in the manner in which health problems and opportunities are identified, understood and addressed’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/phe/phs027

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autism research in Canada disproportionately focusses on the biomedical and clinical aspects of autism rather than the public health or social aspects.

    “Autism research in Canada disproportionately focusses on the biomedical and clinical aspects of autism rather than the public health or social aspects (Krahn & Fenton, 2012).”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Krahn & Fenton, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krahn, T. M., & Fenton, A.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • California State University, Fresno (US)
Corresponding author
Krahn, T. M.
Venue
Public Health Ethics
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
296-310
ISSN
  • 1754-9973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9981
OpenAlex
W2029661646
Cited by
22
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Health Ethics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, research funding priorities, research agenda, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, health research funding, stakeholder interests, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review