Cited by 79Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMedical Coding and Health InformationHealth and Medical Studies

Validity of autism diagnoses using administrative health data

Open access
Dodds, L., Spencer, A., Shea, S., Fell, D., Armson, B.A., Allen, A.C., Bryson, S.·2009·Chronic Diseases in Canada

Abstract

It is necessary to monitor autism prevalence in order to plan education support and health services for affected children. This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of administrative health databases for autism diagnoses. Three administrative health databases from the province of Nova Scotia were used to identify diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders (ASD): the Hospital Discharge Abstract Database, the Medical Services Insurance Physician Billings Database and the Mental Health Outpatient Information System database. Seven algorithms were derived from combinations of requirements for single or multiple ASD claims from one or more of the three administrative databases. Diagnoses made by the Autism Team of the IWK Health Centre, using state-of-the-art autism diagnostic schedules, were compared with each algorithm, and the sensitivity, specificity and C-statistic (i.e. a measure of the discrimination ability of the model) were calculated. The algorithm with the best test characteristics was based on one ASD code in any of the three databases (sensitivity=69.3%). Sensitivity based on an ASD code in either the hospital or the physician billing databases was 62.5%. Administrative health databases are potentially a cost efficient source for conducting autism surveillance, especially when compared to methods involving the collection of new data. However, additional data sources are needed to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of identifying autism in Canada.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24095/hpcdp.29.3.02

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administrative databases are usually associated with lower sensitivity for case finding, especially in areas with limited availability and/or access to services.

    “but they are usually associated with lower sensitivity for case finding (Dodds et al., 2009), especially in areas with limited availability and/or access to service.”

    From Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update (2022) · cites this paper as Dodds et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dodds, L., Spencer, A., Shea, S., Fell, D., Armson, B. A., Allen, A. C., & Bryson, S.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Chronic Diseases in Canada
Published
2009-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
102-107
ISSN
  • 0228-8699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1481-8523
OpenAlex
W1911918103
Cited by
79
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chronic diseases in Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (ASCN4975)
  • Dalhousie University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism diagnosis, administrative health data, diagnostic accuracy, hospital discharge abstracts, physician billing data, surveillance algorithms, sensitivity and specificity, Nova Scotia
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Ambulatory Care, Autistic Disorder, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Insurance Claim Reporting, Male, Nova Scotia, Patient Credit and Collection, Patient Discharge, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Incidence, Prevalence, Discriminant Analysis, Databases, Factual, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review