Cited by 125Ethics and bioethics in healthcareVaccine Coverage and HesitancyPublic Health Policies and Education

Vaccination, Risks, and Freedom: The Seat Belt Analogy

Open access
Giubilini, Alberto, Savulescu, Julian·2019·Public Health Ethics

Abstract

We argue that, from the point of view public health ethics, vaccination is significantly analogous to seat belt use in motor vehicles and that coercive vaccination policies are ethically justified for the same reasons why coercive seat belt laws are ethically justified. We start by taking seriously the small risk of vaccines’ side effects and the fact that such risks might need to be coercively imposed on individuals. If millions of individuals are vaccinated, even a very small risk of serious side effects implies that, statistically, at some point side effects will occur. Imposing such risks raises issues about individual freedom to decide what risks to take on oneself or on one’s children and about attribution of responsibility in case of adverse side effects. Seat belt requirements raise many of the same ethical issues as vaccination requirements, and seat belt laws initially encountered some opposition from the public that is very similar to some of the current opposition to vaccine mandates. The analogy suggests that the risks of vaccines do not constitute strong enough reasons against coercive vaccination policies and that the same reasons that justify compulsory seat belt use—a measure now widely accepted and endorsed—also justify coercive vaccination policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/phe/phz014

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Verweij M., Dawson A. (2004). Ethical Principles for Collective Immunization Programs. Vaccine, 22, 3122– 3126. 15297064
  2. Vrolix C. (2006). Behavioural Adaptation, Risk Compensation, Risk Homeostasis and Moral Hazard in Traffic Safety Literature Review, available from: https://doclib.uhasselt.be/dspace/bitstream/1942/4002/1/behavioraladaptation.pdf [accessed 1 October 2019].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Giubilini, Alberto
Venue
Public Health Ethics
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
237-249
ISSN
  • 1754-9973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9981
OpenAlex
W2981729841
Cited by
125
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oxford Martin School
  • University of Oxford
  • Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford
  • Wellcome Centre (203132/Z/16/Z)
  • Wellcome Trust (104848/Z/14/Z)
  • Children's Research Institute
  • Victorian State Government
  • Operational Infrastructure Support
  • OIS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
vaccination, seat belt laws, vaccine side effects, individual liberty, mandatory vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review