Cited by 23Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

A Systematic Review of Practiced-Based Research of Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies as Provided for Pain Management in Clinical Settings: Recommendations for the Future and a Call to Action

Open access
Dyer, Natalie L, Surdam, Jessica, Dusek, Jeffery A·2022·Pain Medicine

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate practice-based, real-world research of individualized complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies for pain as provided in CIH outpatient clinics. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on articles in PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase published through December 2020. The study was listed in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020159193). Major categories of variables extracted included study details and demographics, interventions, and outcomes. Results: The literature search yielded 3,316 records, with 264 assessed for full-text review. Of those, 23 studies (including ∼8,464 patients) were specific to pain conditions as a main outcome. Studies included chiropractic, acupuncture, multimodal individualized intervention/programs, physiotherapy, and anthroposophic medicine therapy. Retention rates ranged from 53% to 91%, with studies offering monetary incentives showing the highest retention. The 0–10 numerical rating scale was the most common pain questionnaire (n = 10; 43% of studies), with an average percent improvement across all studies and time points of 32% (range: 18–60%). Conclusions: Findings from this systematic review of practice-based, real-word research indicate that CIH therapies exert positive effects on various pain outcomes. Although all studies reported beneficial impacts on one or more pain outcomes, the heterogeneous nature of the studies limits our overall understanding of CIH as provided in clinical settings. Accordingly, we present numerous recommendations to improve publication reporting and guide future research. Our call to action is that future practice-based CIH research is needed, but it should be more expansive and conducted in association with a CIH scientific society with academic and health care members.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pm/pnab151

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dyer, N. L., Surdam, J., & Dusek, J. A.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
Dusek, Jeffery A
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2021-05-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
189-210
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W3162950442
Cited by
23
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation and Chris and Sara Connor
  • U01 cooperative (AT010598)
  • NCT (NCT04880733)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) of the National Institutes of Health
  • NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
pain management, practice-based research, real-world evidence, chiropractic, acupuncture, physiotherapy, anthroposophic medicine, multimodal intervention, patient retention, financial incentives, pain outcome measures, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review