Cited by 178Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The impact of massage therapy on function in pain populations—A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: part I, patients experiencing pain in the general population

Open access
Crawford, Cindy, Boyd, Courtney, Paat, Charmagne F., Price, Ashley, Xenakis, Lea, Yang, EunMee, Zhang, Weimin, the Evidence for Massage Therapy (EMT) Working Group·2016·Pain Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pain is multi-dimensional and may be better addressed through a holistic, biopsychosocial approach. Massage therapy is commonly practiced among patients seeking pain management; however, its efficacy is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to rigorously assess the quality of massage therapy research and evidence for its efficacy in treating pain, function-related and health-related quality of life outcomes across all pain populations. METHODS: Key databases were searched from inception through February 2014. Eligible randomized controlled trials were assessed for methodological quality using SIGN 50 Checklist. Meta-analysis was applied at the outcome level. A diverse steering committee interpreted the results to develop recommendations. RESULTS: Sixty high quality and seven low quality studies were included in the review. Results demonstrate massage therapy effectively treats pain compared to sham [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -.44], no treatment (SMD = -1.14), and active (SMD = -0.26) comparators. Compared to active comparators, massage therapy was also beneficial for treating anxiety (SMD = -0.57) and health-related quality of life (SMD = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence, massage therapy, compared to no treatment, should be strongly recommended as a pain management option. Massage therapy is weakly recommended for reducing pain, compared to other sham or active comparators, and improving mood and health-related quality of life, compared to other active comparators. Massage therapy safety, research challenges, how to address identified research gaps, and necessary next steps for implementing massage therapy as a viable pain management option are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pm/pnw099

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [112]Stratford PW Levy DR Gauldie S Miseferi D Levy K. The evaluation of phonophoresis and friction massage as treatments for extensor carpi radialis tendinitis. Randomized Controlled Trial Physiother Can 1989; 41(2): 93– 9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, C., Boyd, C., Paat, C. F., Price, A., Xenakis, L., Yang, E., Zhang, W., & the Evidence for Massage Therapy (EMT) Working Group
Affiliations
Samueli Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Boyd, Courtney
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2016-05-10
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
1353-1375
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2380140620
Cited by
178
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Samueli Institute
  • Massage Therapy Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
massage, pain management, health-related quality of life, functions, anxiety, sham treatment, biopsychosocial model, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review