Cited by 28Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Telehealth and Rural-Urban Differences in Receipt of Pain Care in the Veterans Health Administration

Chen, Jessica A, DeFaccio, Rian J, Gelman, Hannah, Thomas, Eva R, Indresano, Jess A, Dawson, Timothy C, Glynn, Lisa H, Sandbrink, Friedhelm +1 more·2022·Pain Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Examine changes in specialty pain utilization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) after establishing a virtual interdisciplinary pain team (TelePain). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A single VHA healthcare system, 2015–2019. Subjects: 33,169 patients with chronic pain-related diagnoses. Methods: We measured specialty pain utilization (in-person and telehealth) among patients with moderate to severe chronic pain. We used generalized estimating equations to test the association of time (pre- or post-TelePain) and rurality on receipt of specialty pain care. Results: Among patients with moderate to severe chronic pain, the reach of specialty pain care increased from 11.1% to 16.2% in the pre- to post-TelePain periods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–1.49). This was true of both urban patients (aOR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.53–1.71) and rural patients (aOR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99–1.36), although the difference for rural patients was not statistically significant. Among rural patients who received specialty pain care, a high percentage of the visits were delivered by telehealth (nearly 12% in the post-TelePain period), much higher than among urban patients (3%). Conclusions: We observed increased use of specialty pain services among all patients with chronic pain. Although rural patients did not achieve the same degree of access and utilization overall as urban patients, their use of pain telehealth increased substantially and may have substituted for in-person visits. Targeted implementation efforts may be needed to further increase the reach of services to patients living in areas with limited specialty pain care options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pm/pnab194

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J. A., DeFaccio, R. J., Gelman, H., Thomas, E. R., Indresano, J. A., Dawson, T. C., Glynn, L. H., Sandbrink, F., & Zeliadt, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jessica A
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2021-06-19
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
466-474
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W3169963966
Cited by
28
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
  • Expanding TelePain Across VISN20 (I50 HX002902)
  • VA Health Services Research & Development Career Development Award (IK2 HX002866)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
telemedicine, chronic pain, urban-rural differences, Veterans Health Administration, access to pain care, veterans
MeSH terms
Humans, Retrospective Studies, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Telemedicine, Veterans Health, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review