Cited by 21Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Holography and Microscopy

Mantis: High-throughput 4D imaging and analysis of the molecular and physical architecture of cells

Open access
Ivanov, Ivan E, Hirata-Miyasaki, Eduardo, Chandler, Talon, Cheloor-Kovilakam, Rasmi, Liu, Ziwen, Pradeep, Soorya, Liu, Chad, Bhave, Madhura +5 more·2024·PNAS Nexus

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

High-throughput dynamic imaging of cells and organelles is essential for understanding complex cellular responses. We report Mantis, a high-throughput 4D microscope that integrates two complementary, gentle, live-cell imaging technologies: remote-refocus label-free microscopy and oblique light-sheet fluorescence microscopy. Additionally, we report shrimPy (Smart High-throughput Robust Imaging and Measurement in Python), an open-source software for high-throughput imaging, deconvolution, and single-cell phenotyping of 4D data. Using Mantis and shrimPy, we achieved high-content correlative imaging of molecular dynamics and the physical architecture of 20 cell lines every 15 min over 7.5 h. This platform also facilitated detailed measurements of the impacts of viral infection on the architecture of host cells and host proteins. The Mantis platform can enable high-throughput profiling of intracellular dynamics, long-term imaging and analysis of cellular responses to perturbations, and live-cell optical screens to dissect gene regulatory networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae323

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ivanov, I. E., Hirata-Miyasaki, E., Chandler, T., Cheloor-Kovilakam, R., Liu, Z., Pradeep, S., Liu, C., Bhave, M., Khadka, S., Arias, C., Leonetti, M. D., Huang, B., & Mehta, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ivanov, Ivan E
  • Huang, Bo
  • Mehta, Shalin B
Venue
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-08-09
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
pgae323-pgae323
ISSN
2752-6542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401449175
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PNAS Nexus (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub
  • National Institute of Health (R01GM131641)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Digital Holography and Microscopy
Keywords
deconvolution, single-cell phenotyping, correlative imaging, cellular architecture, intracellular dynamics, long-term live-cell imaging, gene regulatory networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review