Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
SUMMARY Genetic screens are critical for the systematic identification of genes underlying cellular phenotypes. Pooling gene perturbations greatly improves scalability, but is not compatible with imaging of complex and dynamic cellular phenotypes. Here, we introduce a pooled approach for optical genetic screens in mammalian cells. We use targeted in situ sequencing to demultiplex a library of genetic perturbations following image-based phenotyping. We screened a set of 952 genes across millions of cells for involvement in NF-κB signaling by imaging the translocation of RelA (p65) to the nucleus. Screening at a single time point across 3 cell lines recovered 15 known pathway components, while repeating the screen with live-cell imaging revealed a role for Mediator complex subunits in regulating the duration of p65 nuclear retention. These results establish a highly multiplexed approach to image-based screens of spatially and temporally defined phenotypes with pooled libraries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Phenotype strength was well correlated between primary screening and validation ranks, with Spearman's ρ = 0.84 and 0.73 for IL-1β and TNFα, respectively.
“Phenotype strength was well correlated between the primary screening and validation ranks (Spearman’s ρ = 0.84 and 0.73 for IL-1β and TNFα, respectively), emphasizing the quantitative nature of the primary screen (Figure S4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After serial transduction and antibiotic selection, 81% of cells contained reads mapping to two sgRNAs.
“Most cells (81%) contained reads mapping to two sgRNAs (Figure S2C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The in situ readout step can process millions of cells within a few days to provide high coverage (typically 100-1,000 cells/perturbation) needed for high-throughput optical screening.
“We showed that the in situ readout step can process millions of cells within a few days to provide the high coverage (typically 100–1,000 cells/perturbation) needed for high-throughput optical screening.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Screening the same cell library by FACS with NGS readout showed similar enrichment of targeting sgRNAs, with 95% of barcodes within 5-fold abundance in both contexts.
“Screening the same cell library by FACS with NGS readout showed similar enrichment of targeting sgRNAs (Figures 3C and S3D), with consistent representation of most barcodes in both contexts (95% within 5-fold abundance, Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The paper reports an optical pooled screening method that expands the range of phenotypes amenable to large-scale pooled perturbation screens in mammalian cells.
“Here, we report an optical pooled screening method that greatly expands the range of phenotypes amenable to large-scale pooled perturbation screens in mammalian cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation
A modified lentiviral packaging protocol reduced the frequency of cells exhibiting swapped barcodes from more than 28% to less than 5%.
“We addressed a known problem whereby barcode-sgRNA associations are swapped due to reverse transcription-mediated recombination during lentiviral infection (Adamson et al., 2018; Hill et al., 2018; Sack et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2018) by using a modified lentiviral packaging protocol (Feldman et al., 2018) that reduced the frequency of cells exhibiting swapped barcodes from >28% to <5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adamson et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hill et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Feldman et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
There were no errors in barcode-to-phenotype assignment even for barcodes represented by very few cells.
“Indeed, there were no errors in barcode-to-phenotype assignment even for barcodes represented by very few cells (Figures 3B and S3C, STAR Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hits common to both cytokine stimulations included MAP3K7 and its target IKK complex (CHUK, IKBKB, IKBKG), as well as components of the SKP1-CUL1-F-box ubiquitin ligase complex and proteasome subunits.
“Hits common to both cytokine stimulations included MAP3K7 and its target, the IKK complex (CHUK, IKBKB, IKBKG), as well as components of the SKP1-CUL1-F-box ubiquitin ligase complex and proteasome subunits, which together promote degradation of the inhibitor NFKBIA/IκBα and nuclear translocation of p65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sequencing amplified DNA with 4-color SBS over 12 cycles generated high quality reads with excellent uniformity among barcodes.
“Sequencing the amplified DNA with a 4-color sequencing-by-synthesis chemistry over 12 cycles generated high quality reads with excellent uniformity among barcodes (Figure 2B and S1B-G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More than 85% of sequence reads mapped exactly to one of 40 expected barcodes out of 16.7 million possible 12-nt sequences.
“After image segmentation and base calling analysis, more than 85% of sequence reads mapped exactly to one of the 40 expected barcodes out of the 412 = 16.7 million possible 12-nt sequences (Figure 2C, STAR Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The p65-mNeonGreen screen showed high sensitivity, detecting genes known to be involved in NF-κB activation that show only modest translocation defects, including RBCK1/HOIL1, DCUN1D1, and COPS5.
“The p65-mNeonGreen screen showed high sensitivity, detecting genes known to be involved in NF-κB activation that show only modest translocation defects in our model system. This set includes genes such as RBCK1/HOIL1 (LUBAC complex, poly-ubiquitination of IKBKG/NEMO and RIPK1), DCUN1D1 (neddylation of CUL1) and COPS5 (COP9 signalosome, regulates neddylation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In situ sequencing could be used to read out multiple perturbations within the same cell.
“Moreover, we showed that in situ sequencing could be used to read out multiple perturbations within the same cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All barcodes encoding targeting sgRNAs were distinguishable from control sgRNAs by HA+ fraction, with a per-cell identification accuracy of 90.6%.
“All barcodes encoding targeting sgRNAs were distinguishable from control sgRNAs by HA+ fraction, with a per-cell identification accuracy of 90.6% (based on false positive events in which HA+ cells were assigned control sgRNAs, STAR Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
High signal intensity allows accurate sequence data at low optical magnification across large fields of view, each containing thousands of cells.
“High signal intensity allows accurate sequence data to be obtained at low optical magnification across large fields of view, each containing thousands of cells (Figure 2B, Movie S1, Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
19 out of 20 top-ranked hits were validated by individual CRISPR knockouts at a z-score threshold of 3.75.
“We confirmed the results of the pooled screen by individual CRISPR knockouts, with 19 out of 20 top-ranked hits validated (z-score threshold 3.75, Figure 4E and Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Validated hits included known negative regulators of NF-κB activation, such as NFKBIA/IκBα and CYLD.
“Interestingly, the set of screening hits validated by arrayed knockout using multiple individual sgRNAs included known negative regulators of NF-κB activation, such as NFKBIA/κBα and CYLD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CROP-seq vector achieved comparably robust mapping of CRISPR sgRNAs to the frameshift reporter phenotype in HeLa, U2-OS, HCT116, A375, HT1080 and HEK293 cells, with per-cell identification accuracy ranging from 83-98%.
“We achieved comparably robust mapping of CRISPR sgRNAs to the frameshift reporter phenotype with the CROP-seq vector in HeLa cells as well as U2-OS, HCT116, A375, HT1080 and HEK293 cells (Figure 3D), with per-cell identification accuracy ranging from 83–98%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Systematic testing of 84 CROP-seq-targeting padlocks yielded a top-performing padlock with a 4-fold increase in reads per cell and a 1.7-fold increase in signal intensity relative to the median padlock.
“We then systematically tested a set of 84 CROP-seq-targeting padlocks with a range of padlock binding arm sequences, padlock backbone lengths and backbone sequences (STAR Methods, Figure S2B, Table S2) to yield a top-performing CROP-seq padlock with a 4-fold increase in reads per cell and 1.7-fold increase in signal intensity relative to the median padlock.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some annotated regulators were not detected as hits in any of the three cell lines.
“Notably, some annotated regulators were not detected as hits in any of the three cell lines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The validation screen identified MED12 and MED24 as negative regulators of p65 nuclear translocation that were not previously known.
“The validation screen also confirmed MED12 and MED24 as previously unknown negative regulators of p65 nuclear translocation (Figures 5B, 5C and S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Before this study, Mediator subunits were not known to act as negative regulators of NF-κB nuclear translocation or its transcriptional output.
- Findingown data
Screening at a single time point across 3 cell lines recovered 15 known pathway components.
“Screening at a single time point across 3 cell lines recovered 15 known pathway components, while repeating the screen with live-cell imaging revealed a role for Mediator complex subunits in regulating the duration of p65 nuclear retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
UFD1 shared a similar morphological profile to COPS5.
“UFD1, a member of the VCP/p97-UFD1-NPL4 complex that mediates post-ubiquitination degradation of IκBα, shared a similar morphological profile to COPS5, which interacts directly with VCP/p97 as part of the COP9 signalosome (Cayli et al., 2009; Li et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cayli et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
TAB1 was not detected as a hit in any cell line.
“Meanwhile, knockdown of TAB1 was previously shown not to impact IKK activation (Chen, 2005; Wang et al., 2001), consistent with our finding that TAB1 was not detected as a hit in any cell line.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Disruption of INO80, NOP53/GLTSCR2, and UBA52 showed a decrease in cell and nuclear area.
“Disruption of the chromatin remodeler INO80, as well as NOP53/GLTSCR2, and UBA52, genes with roles in ribosome biogenesis, showed a decrease in cell and nuclear area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TRAF2 scored as a positive regulator in all three cell lines.
“Indeed, TRAF2 scored as a positive regulator in all three cell lines, while BIRC2 was only detected in HeLa, suggesting its role may vary among the different cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The live-cell screen closely reproduced hits from the fixed-cell activation screen, with 15 out of 20 top positive regulators shared when restricted to a single matched time point.
“The live-cell screen closely reproduced hits from the fixed-cell activation screen described above, with 15 out of the 20 top positive regulators shared when the live cell analysis was restricted to a single matched time point (STAR Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At this high level of sampling, individual sgRNAs targeting a given gene showed excellent concordance.
“At this high level of sampling, individual sgRNAs targeting a given gene showed excellent concordance (Figure 5B and Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proteasomal knockouts induced a distinct morphology of rounded cells with low eccentricity and enlarged nuclei.
“For example, proteasomal knockouts induced a distinct morphology consisting of rounded cells (low eccentricity) with enlarged nuclei.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Certain classes of genes led to similar morphological changes in cells.
“In addition to the translocation defect measured in knockouts of NF-κB positive regulators, we observed that certain classes of genes led to similar morphological changes in cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BIRC2 was only detected in HeLa cells.
“Indeed, TRAF2 scored as a positive regulator in all three cell lines, while BIRC2 was only detected in HeLa, suggesting its role may vary among the different cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeating the screen with live-cell imaging revealed a role for Mediator complex subunits in regulating the duration of p65 nuclear retention.
“repeating the screen with live-cell imaging revealed a role for Mediator complex subunits in regulating the duration of p65 nuclear retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BIRC2 was detected only in HeLa cells to be involved in TNFα-dependent p65 translocation.
“Similarly, BIRC2 was detected only in HeLa cells to be involved in TNFα-dependent p65 translocation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Antibody screens detected many KEGG-annotated regulators found in the HeLa p65-mNeonGreen screen: 17/19 in HeLa, 18/19 in A549, and 11/19 in HCT116.
“The antibody screens detected many of the KEGG-annotated regulators found in the HeLa p65-mNeonGreen screen (17/19 in HeLa, 18/19 in A549 and 11/19 in HCT116, Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The screen identified candidate regulators including BAP1, HCFC1, and KCTD5.
“The screen also identified several candidate regulators, including BAP1, HCFC1, and KCTD5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MED12/MED24 knockouts led to sustained expression of key NF-κB target genes.
“MED12/MED24 knockouts led to sustained expression of key NF-κB target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By integrating differences in translocation over time, they identified known key negative regulators with effects on p65 relaxation that did not score in the initial static screen, including TNFAIP3, KEAP1, and USP7.
“By integrating differences in translocation over time, we were able to identify known key negative regulators of the pathway with effects on p65 relaxation that did not score in the initial static screen, including TNFAIP3 (an NF-κB target gene that provides negative feedback by deubiquitinating multiple upstream signaling components) (Chen, 2005), KEAP1 (a ubiquitin ligase involved in degradation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
They screened a CROP-seq library of sgRNAs targeting the same 952 genes (5,638 sgRNAs) for variability in the timing of p65 activation and relaxation, analyzing 434,505 cells.
“As optical pooled screens can be readily combined with live-cell imaging, we screened a CROP-seq library of sgRNAs targeting the same 952 genes (5,638 sgRNAs) detected in the initial activation screen for variability in the timing of p65 activation and relaxation (434,505 cells analyzed, Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hierarchical clustering of mean translocation time profiles revealed distinct populations of positive and negative regulators.
“Hierarchical clustering of mean translocation time profiles revealed distinct populations of positive and negative regulators (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perturbations of known NF-κB genes produced effects ranging from a large increase in fully untranslocated cells, as with MAP3K7, to more subtle negative shifts in the translocation score distribution, as with IKBKB.
“The phenotypic effects of perturbations targeting known NF-κB genes ranged from a large increase in fully untranslocated cells (e.g., MAP3K7) to more subtle negative shifts in the distribution of scores (e.g., IKBKB).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A pooled CRISPR loss-of-function screen of 952 genes in several cell lines found almost every known regulator of NF-κB activation by TNFα and IL-1β.
“We applied pooled CRISPR loss-of-function screening targeting 952 genes in multiple cell lines to identify regulators of p65 translocation, recovering nearly all annotated regulators of TNFα- and IL-1β -induced NF-κB activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RNA sequencing of clonal MED12 or MED24 knockout lines after 4 h of TNFα or IL-1β stimulation found six genes (CCL2, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXLC3, CXCL8) differentially expressed versus wild type (over 8-fold change, adjusted p<10^-3) among genes highly induced in wild type (over 50-fold, adjusted p<10^-3).
“we identified 6 genes (CCL2, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXLC3, CXCL8) that were differentially expressed in either MED12 or MED24 clonal knockout cells (>8-fold change versus wild type cells at 4 hours post-stimulation with either cytokine, adjusted p-value < 10−3) (Figure 5E, STAR Methods)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A clone with a mono-allelic MED24 knockout had a much weaker phenotype than homozygous knockouts.
“Of note, a mono-allelic MED24 knockout clone showed a much weaker phenotype”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The frameshift reporter's false-positive rate, measured for a single perturbation in arrayed format, is less than 0.001%.
“supported by the very low false positive rate (<0.001 %) of the frameshift reporter itself, measured for a single perturbation in arrayed format”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After TNFα treatment, pro-IL-1β mRNA increased in HeLa cells lacking MED12 or MED24, whereas wild-type cells showed no such increase.
“was transcriptionally induced in MED12 or MED24 deficient HeLa cells but not in wild type cells upon TNFα stimulation (Figure 5F)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The sgRNA translocation defect metric separated known NF-κB genes from controls better than the commonly used Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance.
“We found this metric performed better at separating known genes from controls than the often-used Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The estimated rate of assigning an incorrect perturbation barcode to a cell is 9.4%.
“we estimated the misidentification rate to be twice as large, or 9.4%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All HA+ cells that mapped to a non-targeting control sgRNA, which was 4.7% of such cells, were false positives caused by incorrect barcode assignment.
- Rests on an assumption: Incorrect barcode assignments were equally likely to map an HA+ cell to a targeting sgRNA or to a control sgRNA.
- Findingown data
Principal component analysis of morphological features revealed distinct clusters for regulators downstream of IKK.
“We performed dimensionality reduction by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and visualized the first two principal components, finding distinct clusters for regulators downstream of IKK (Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Image-based screening of pooled perturbations has only been demonstrated with FISH-based approaches requiring high-magnification imaging with limited scalability for mammalian applications.
“Image-based screening of pooled perturbations has thus far only been demonstrated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based approaches that required high-magnification imaging with limited scalability for mammalian applications (Lawson et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Combined errors from oligo synthesis, library cloning, lentiviral delivery, barcode diffusion, barcode readout, or incorrect assignment are infrequent enough to permit pooled functional screens.
“Thus, the combined errors that may arise from oligonucleotide synthesis, library cloning, lentiviral delivery, barcode diffusion during in situ processing, barcode readout by in situ sequencing, or incorrect assignment of reads to cells during image processing are infrequent enough to permit pooled functional screens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Pairing sgRNAs with specific barcodes in silico ensures efficient use of available barcodes, in contrast to random pairing.
“In contrast to perturbation barcoding by random pairing (Wang et al., 2019), this approach pairs sgRNAs with specific barcodes in silico, ensuring efficient use of available barcodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The ability to independently sequence perturbations delivered by separate vectors suggests a straightforward and general route to higher-order combinatorial screens.
“The ability to independently sequence perturbations delivered by separate vectors suggests a straightforward and general route to higher-order combinatorial screens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The barcode design allows rejection of reads containing up to two single base insertion/deletion/substitution errors.
“This allows rejection of reads containing up to two single base insertion/deletion/substitution errors arising from oligo synthesis or in situ processing (Figure 2F, STAR Methods) (Buschmann and Bystrykh, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buschmann and Bystrykh, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These results establish a highly multiplexed approach to image-based screens of spatially and temporally defined phenotypes with pooled libraries.
“These results establish a highly multiplexed approach to image-based screens of spatially and temporally defined phenotypes with pooled libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The robustness and scalability of the optical pooled screening protocol makes it possible to conduct in-depth analyses of biological pathways across cellular backgrounds.
“The robustness and scalability of the optical pooled screening protocol makes it possible to conduct in-depth analyses of biological pathways across cellular backgrounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TRAF5 and BIRC3 have functionally redundant counterparts, TRAF2 and BIRC2.
“Among these, TRAF5 and BIRC3 have functionally redundant counterparts (TRAF2 and BIRC2) (Mahoney et al., 2008; Tada et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
BIRC2's role may vary among different cell lines.
“Indeed, TRAF2 scored as a positive regulator in all three cell lines, while BIRC2 was only detected in HeLa, suggesting its role may vary among the different cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach paves the way to pooled image-based screens of genome-scale libraries.
“The approach demonstrated here paves the way to pooled image-based screens of genome-scale libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings suggest that Mediator subunits restrain the TNFα-driven increase in pro-IL-1β.
“Our results indicated that Mediator components play a role in suppressing pro-IL-1β induction by TNFα signaling”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Measuring dynamic responses like p65 translocation kinetics gives gene-knockout profiling a time axis, so onset, duration, magnitude, sign, and cytokine selectivity can be read directly.
“The ability to screen dynamic responses, such as p65 translocation kinetics, adds a rich temporal dimension to the profiling of gene knockouts, permitting direct measurement of response onset and duration in addition to strength, directionality (positive/negative) and cytokine specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Mediator subunits might limit how strongly pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling induces gene expression, beyond their known role in recruiting active RNA polymerase-II to DNA-bound transcription factors including p65.
“These results suggest that, apart from the well-studied function of the Mediator complex in recruiting active RNA polymerase-II to DNA-bound transcription factors (Malik and Roeder, 2005) including to p65 (Guermah et al., 1998), Mediator components may be involved in restricting the transcriptional response of induced genes during pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Malik and Roeder, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guermah et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Optical pooled screening permits systematic study of genes that control phenotypes defined in space and time, such as subcellular location, live-cell dynamics, and high-content morphology.
“Optical pooled screens enable systematic analysis of the genetic components underpinning a wide range of spatially and temporally defined phenotypes, including subcellular localization, live-cell dynamics, and high-content morphological profiling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Individual colonies from the final library were Sanger-sequenced to confirm that sgRNAs and barcodes were correctly paired.
“The sgRNA-barcode association was validated by Sanger sequencing individual colonies from the final library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
This restraint might explain how aberrant feedback activation of immune pathways is avoided.
“which might provide a mechanism for preventing aberrant feedback activation of immune signaling pathways (Bauernfeind et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bauernfeind et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Secretion of IL-1β requires both NF-κB-driven transcription and Caspase 1-mediated post-transcriptional processing.
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn situ sequencing uses enzymatic amplification to generate high signal levels, permitting imaging at low magnification, which made it feasible to screen millions of cells from a pooled library.
“In situ sequencing uses enzymatic amplification to generate high signal levels, permitting imaging at low magnification, which made it feasible for us to screen millions of cells from a pooled library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reporter is highly specific and sensitive, with mean in situ activation across 5 targeting sgRNAs of 65 ± 2.7% and background below 0.001% in the absence of a targeting sgRNA.
“The reporter is highly specific and sensitive, with a mean in situ activation across 5 targeting sgRNAs of 65 ± 2.7% and background of <0.001 % in the absence of a targeting sgRNA (Figures 3B and S3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CROP-seq vector directly sequencing sgRNA showed accurate sequencing in HeLa-TetR-Cas9 cells but reduced fluorescent signal intensity compared to LentiGuide-BC.
“We observed accurate sequencing of sgRNAs in HeLa-TetR-Cas9 cells, but with reduced fluorescent signal intensity compared to LentiGuide-BC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHits included known pathway components annotated by KEGG for NF-κB activation by IL-1β signaling (5/5 genes), TNFα signaling (4/7 genes) and downstream components (5/7 genes).
“The hits in our screen included known pathway components annotated by KEGG (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000) for NF-κB activation by IL-1β signaling (5/5 genes), TNFα signaling (4/7 genes) and downstream components (5/7 genes), including cytokine-specific receptors, adaptor proteins, and factors that activate the shared regulator MAP3K7 (Figure 4D) (Gewurz et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kanehisa and Goto, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gewurz et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing the optimized protocol, in situ sequencing spots were readily visible at 10X magnification, with at least one exactly mapped read detected in more than 77% of transduced cells.
“Using the optimized protocol, in situ sequencing spots were readily visible at 10X optical magnification, with at least one exactly mapped read detected in more than 77% of transduced cells (Figures 2B, 2D and 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 3,037,909 cells were retained for analysis after filtering based on reporter expression, nuclear morphology, and exact barcode mapping, with 952 out of 963 genes retained.
“A total of 3,037,909 cells were retained for analysis after filtering cells based on reporter expression, nuclear morphology, and exact barcode mapping (952 out of 963 genes retained for analysis) (Figure S3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pooled validation screen confirmed several genes initially detected as lower-ranked hits in the activation screen, while adding additional kinetic details.
“The pooled validation screen confirmed several genes that were initially detected as lower-ranked hits in the activation screen, while adding additional kinetic details.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMembers of the CUL1-RBX1-SKP1-FBXW11 complex and its substrate NEDD8 showed increased cell and nuclear area, with 4 out of 5 genes grouped together by PCA.
“Members of the CUL1-RBX1-SKP1-FBXW11 complex and its substrate NEDD8 showed increased cell and nuclear area, with 4 out of 5 genes grouped together by PCA (Figures S4D-H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt later time points, RIPK1 showed an increased translocation defect while KCTD5 and HCFC1 were seen to negatively regulate p65.
“For example, at later time points, RIPK1 showed an increased translocation defect while KCTD5 and HCFC1 were seen to negatively regulate p65.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey optimized live-cell imaging and cell tracking with faster microscope hardware, linking time-resolved p65 translocation data to perturbation barcodes from 2,595,514 cells (median 3,611 cells/sgRNA) at 30 minute intervals.
“We optimized conditions for live-cell imaging and cell tracking by using faster microscope hardware, allowing us to link time-resolved p65 translocation data to perturbation barcodes from 2,595,514 cells (median of 3,611 cells/sgRNA) at 30 minute intervals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey performed a pooled validation screen for 61 genes with evidence for a kinetic phenotype, using 10 sgRNAs per gene.
“Next, we performed a pooled validation screen for 61 genes that showed evidence for a kinetic phenotype (10 sgRNAs/gene).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study shows that several perturbations can be identified in one cell, which offers a way to examine higher-order genetic interactions.
“We demonstrate the identification of multiple perturbations within the same cell, providing a straightforward route to study higher order genetic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing a pooled live-cell imaging screen, the authors found two Mediator subunits that had not been known to negatively regulate pro-inflammatory signaling, and confirmed this in clonal knockouts.
“Moreover, by performing a pooled live-cell imaging screen, we discovered two components of the Mediator complex as previously unknown negative regulators of pro-inflammatory signaling that we validated in clonal knockout cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Before this study, Mediator subunits were not known to act as negative regulators of NF-κB nuclear translocation or its transcriptional output.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe 12-nucleotide barcodes in this work reliably separate over 80,000 perturbations, which is enough for genome-wide libraries.
“The 12-nt sequences used here can robustly distinguish >80,000 perturbations, sufficient to encode genome-scale perturbation libraries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHomozygous clonal knockouts of MED12 and MED24 each displayed delayed relaxation compared with wild-type cells.
“Clonal homozygous knockouts of each of these Mediator complex subunits confirmed delayed relaxation relative to wild type cells (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBecause the LentiGuide-BC and CROP-seq libraries produce mRNA that encodes each perturbation, the same cell populations can be analyzed in situ for dynamic or spatial readouts and also by methods like single-cell RNA-seq.
“The LentiGuide-BC and CROP-seq libraries described in this study both generate mRNA encoding perturbation identity, so the same libraries of perturbed cells can be screened in situ to read dynamic and/or spatially resolved information and by complementary molecular profiling methods, such as single cell RNA-seq.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHits were identified at estimated false discovery rates below 10% and below 20% using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
“Hits at an estimated FDR <10% and <20% were identified using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRolling circle amplification allows rapid in situ sequencing with a low-power 10X objective, which raises throughput substantially.
“Amplification by RCA enables fast in situ sequencing at low magnification (10X), greatly increasing throughput.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationKnockout of negative regulators may lead to permanent baseline activation, causing negative feedback activation, potentially rendering cells refractory to induced NF-κB activation.
“Knockout of these negative regulators may lead to permanent baseline activation of NF-κB signaling, which in turn causes negative feedback activation (Jäättelä et al., 1996), potentially rendering perturbed cells refractory to induced NF-κB activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jäättelä et al., 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPooling gene perturbations increases scalability but cannot be combined with imaging of complex or dynamic cellular phenotypes.
“Pooling gene perturbations greatly improves scalability, but is not compatible with imaging of complex and dynamic cellular phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHistorically pooled screens rely on enriching populations for a phenotype followed by NGS to measure perturbation abundance.
“Historically, pooled screens have relied on enriching populations of cells for a phenotype of interest, followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to measure changes in perturbation abundance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNF-κB is a family of transcription factors (p50, p52, p65, RelB, c-Rel) that translocate to the nucleus in response to stimuli.
“After demonstrating the ability to screen genetic knockouts for optical phenotypes, we sought to identify genes required for activation of NF-κB, a family of transcription factors (p50, p52, p65, RelB and c-Rel) that translocate to the nucleus in response to a host of stimuli (Gewurz et al., 2012; Hayden and Ghosh, 2012; Pahl, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBAP1 has been previously described to deubiquitinate HCFC1, with relevance for controlling metabolism, ER-stress signaling, cell-cycle progression, and viral gene expression.
“Among these, BAP1 has been previously described to deubiquitinate HCFC1 (Machida et al., 2009), with relevance for controlling metabolism (Bononi et al., 2017), ER-stress signaling (Dai et al., 2017), cell-cycle progression (Misaghi et al., 2009), and viral gene expression (Johnson et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTAB1 knockdown was previously shown not to impact IKK activation.
“Meanwhile, knockdown of TAB1 was previously shown not to impact IKK activation (Chen, 2005; Wang et al., 2001), consistent with our finding that TAB1 was not detected as a hit in any cell line.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent CRISPR sgRNA libraries can be decoded directly via the CROP-seq vector, while other perturbations, such as ORFs or non-coding elements, can be tagged with short barcodes.
“Existing CRISPR sgRNA libraries can be read out directly (using the CROP-seq vector) while other perturbations (e.g., ORFs, non-coding sequences) can be paired with short barcodes (Melnikov et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPooling raises data quality and cuts cost and labor sharply, so image-based phenotyping at genome scale becomes feasible for many labs.
“Pooling improves data quality and dramatically reduces the cost and labor required, making genome-scale screens with image-based phenotyping accessible to many laboratories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe translocation score was defined as the pixel-wise correlation between DAPI and p65-mNeonGreen within the nuclear region because this metric most clearly separated perturbations of known NF-κB genes from non-targeting controls.
“Pixel-wise DAPI-mNeonGreen correlation within the segmented nuclear region, described above, was used to define the translocation score for each cell as it most clearly separated perturbations against known NF-κB genes from non-targeting controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataLibrary representation was validated by next-generation sequencing.
“Genomic DNA was also extracted for NGS validation of library representation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn situ sequencing can read any perturbation marked by a short expressed sequence, and it scales to millions of cells and genome-wide libraries.
“The in situ sequencing framework is compatible with any perturbation that can be identified by a short expressed sequence and readily scales to millions of cells and genome-scale libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe frameshift reporter screen was performed in three independent replicates.
“This library was transduced into HeLa-TetR-Cas9-FR cells at MOI < 0.05 in three replicates, which were independently cultured and screened.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe chosen HeLa-TetR-Cas9 clone generated indels efficiently (97% or more) when doxycycline was present and cut little (2% or less) when it was absent.
“The best clones showed efficient indel generation (≥ 97%) in the presence of doxycycline and minimal cutting (≤ 2%) in its absence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPooled genome-wide CRISPR screens that enrich cells by fitness or reporter fluorescence are now common in many systems, yet just one large CRISPR imaging screen, with 2,281 sgRNAs, has been published.
“In recent years, there has been wide use of pooled genome-scale CRISPR screens based on enriching cells via fitness or reporter fluorescence in various model systems, but only one large-scale (2,281 sgRNA) CRISPR imaging screen (Groot et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groot et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProtein barcodes based on epitopes offer a promising way to decode pooled elements without enzymes, but their current scale is only around 100 barcodes.
“Epitope-based protein barcodes are a promising method for enzyme-free decoding of pooled elements, but are currently limited in scale to ~100 barcodes (Wroblewska et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wroblewska et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUsing the second-largest sgRNA translocation defect as the gene-level defect reduces false positives from clonal effects and false negatives from inefficient sgRNAs.
“This statistic helps reduce the false positive rate due to clonal effects (integration of an sgRNA into a cell that is defective in translocation) which are independent among sgRNAs and screen replicates, as well as false negatives due to inefficient sgRNAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clonal effects from integration of an sgRNA into a translocation-defective cell are independent across sgRNAs and screen replicates.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPro-IL-1β is a known NF-κB target during Toll-like receptor activation.
“pro-IL-1β, which is a well-established NF-κB target gene in the context of Toll-like receptor activation (Sims and Smith, 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sims and Smith, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe approach is broadly applicable across many settings.
“Our approach is broadly applicable across many settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe primary optical screen is highly sensitive, as shown by detecting the weaker phenotype of a mono-allelic MED24 knockout despite Cas9-generated allele heterogeneity.
“underscoring the high sensitivity of the primary optical screen despite the heterogeneity of alleles generated by Cas9 cleavage (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOptical pooled screening is a useful counterpart to single-cell molecular profiling, which yields rich data but still lacks dynamic and spatial resolution.
“Optical pooled screening serves as an important complement to single-cell molecular profiling, which also provides high-content data but is not yet able to deliver dynamic or spatially resolved information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Pooled libraries can be constructed, introduced, and read out as single samples, reducing cost, effort, and time for large-scale screens.
“Pooled libraries can be constructed, introduced into cells, and read out as single samples, dramatically reducing the cost, effort and time needed to perform large-scale screens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Combining all perturbations into one sample reduces batch effects and improves statistical power because all cells experience the same conditions.
“Moreover, combining all perturbations into a single sample reduces batch effects and improves statistical power since all perturbed and control cells experience the same conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Enrichment-based pooled screens are limited to population-level measurement, often rely on indirect reporters, and limit phenotypes to one or few parameters.
“Although highly scalable, these approaches are limited to population-level measurement, often rely on indirect reporters for the biological activity of interest, and necessarily limit phenotypes to one or a few parameters.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing single-cell molecular profiling approaches are destructive and cannot directly monitor dynamic processes over time in individual cells.
“Moreover, existing single cell molecular profiling approaches are destructive and thus cannot be used to directly monitor dynamic processes over time in individual cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
p65 nuclear translocation is a valid measure of NF-κB activation.
“We used an established nuclear translocation assay to measure the localization of a p65-mNeonGreen reporter in HeLa cells following stimulation with either IL-1β or TNFα, cytokines that activate NF-κB via different pathways (Figure 4A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
At baseline, NF-κB dimers are held inactive in the cytoplasm by IκB proteins that mask nuclear localization signals.
“At baseline, NF-κB dimers are maintained in an inactive state in the cytoplasm by inhibitory IκB proteins, which mask nuclear localization signals to prevent NF-κB translocation into the nucleus.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Ubiquitin signaling may have unrecognized roles in NF-κB activation and relaxation.
“We included all GO-annotated ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinase enzymes, as well as 425 immune-related genes in the library, hypothesizing that ubiquitin signaling may play as-yet unrecognized roles in NF-κB activation and relaxation (return to the baseline cellular distribution) (Chen, 2005) (Figure 4A, Table S3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The kinetics of NF-κB signaling events and feedback loops determine the pathway's dynamic response.
“Activation of NF-κB involves a cascade of signaling events and feedback loops whose kinetics determine the dynamic response of the pathway.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this study, Mediator subunits were not known to act as negative regulators of NF-κB nuclear translocation or its transcriptional output.
“Mediator components have not previously been shown to be involved in negative regulation of either the nuclear translocation or the transcriptional response of NF-κB.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Secretion of IL-1β requires both NF-κB-driven transcription and Caspase 1-mediated post-transcriptional processing.
“As one of the most potent pyrogens in the human body, IL-1β is secreted only upon transcriptional (NF-κB) as well as post-transcriptional (Caspase 1) licensing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Large-scale arrayed perturbation screens are so costly, slow, and laborious that optical phenotyping has seen little use in screening.
“Despite the rich phenotypic information provided by imaging assays, optical phenotyping has been underused for screening applications due to the substantial cost, time and labor required to execute large-scale arrayed perturbation screens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Published highly multiplexed FISH approaches require 60X imaging and barcodes over 200 bp, so direct oligo array synthesis is not cost-effective.
“By comparison, reported methods for highly multiplexed FISH require higher imaging magnification (60X) and barcodes longer than 200 bp, precluding cost-effective direct oligo array synthesis.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All HA+ cells that mapped to a non-targeting control sgRNA, which was 4.7% of such cells, were false positives caused by incorrect barcode assignment.
“we first assumed all HA+ cells mapped to a non-targeting control sgRNA (4.7%) were false positive events due to incorrect barcode assignment”
The paper relies on this without support.
Incorrect barcode assignments were equally likely to map an HA+ cell to a targeting sgRNA or to a control sgRNA.
“as incorrect barcode assignments were equally likely to map an HA+ cell to a targeting or control sgRNA”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clonal effects from integration of an sgRNA into a translocation-defective cell are independent across sgRNAs and screen replicates.
“which are independent among sgRNAs and screen replicates”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Next-generation sequencing approaches have been adapted to enable in situ sequencing of DNA barcodes tagging imaged cells.
“In recent years, next-generation sequencing approaches have been adapted to enable in situ sequencing of DNA barcodes tagging imaged cells (e.g. (94, 95)).”
From Massively parallel functional genomic assays in endocrinology: from promise to delivery (2026) · cites this paper as [95]
Some biological processes are better assayed using alternative modalities (splicing, chromatin, protein, imaging).
“In addition, some biological processes are better assayed using alternative modalities, including mRNA splicing, chromatin state, protein level, and imaging, all of which are now being studied at scale with single cell CRISPR screens39-44.”
From Transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression in perturbation atlases (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Human genetics has successfully identified genetic modifiers for neurodegeneration, such as RAB10 for APOE in Alzheimer's disease and TMEM106B for GRN in frontotemporal dementia.
“Genetic modifiers for neurodegeneration have been identified successfully through human genetics, such as RAB10 for APOE65 in Alzheimer’s Disease (variants in the RAB10 locus are linked to resilience in individuals carrying the high-risk APOE ε4 allele85), and TMEM106B for GRN66, 67 in frontotemporal dementia (SNPs affecting TMEM106B expression are protective in carriers of disease-associated GRN”
From CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease (2020) · cites this paper as [85]
Combining functional methods with complex readouts can generate empirical truth data that supports in silico models predicting causal variants, effector transcripts, and cellular effects.
“Combined with complex readouts–including high-content imaging128 and single-cell transcriptomics and epigenomics129,130–these methods can generate empirical ‘truth’ data, supporting the development of in silico models to predict causal variants, effector transcripts126 and cellular effects.”
From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [128]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Validation screen has two reported gene counts
MinorThe Results describe the pooled validation screen as covering 61 genes, but the Methods say its library targeted 65 candidate genes. The text does not state whether four genes in that library were excluded from the reported analysis.
“Next, we performed a pooled validation screen for 61 genes that showed evidence for a kinetic phenotype (10 sgRNAs/gene).”
“Pooled validation was conducted with a new CROPseq-puro library targeting 65 candidate genes from the primary screen (10 sgRNAs per gene, 100 non-targeting sgRNAs).”
Cites
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Kanehisa, M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.27 · Cited by 37,077 · see citing works
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W., Bono, H., & Kanehisa, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29 · Cited by 31,232 · see citing works
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404 · see citing works
Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3519 · Cited by 9,723 · see citing works
Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3047 · Cited by 5,239 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D. A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Heckl, D., Ebert, B. L., Root, D. E., Doench, J. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247005 · Cited by 5,234 · see citing works
Self-citationAutophagy and Viruses: Adversaries or Allies?
Dong, X., & Levine, B. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000346388 · Cited by 4,441 · see citing works
Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors
Pahl, H. L. (1999) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203239 · Cited by 3,727 · see citing works
Activators and Target Genes of Rel/NF-кB Transcription Factors
Loop, T., & Pahl, H. L. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0163-2_1 · Cited by 3,179 · see citing works
Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells
Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S., & Zhuang, X. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa6090 · Cited by 2,969 · see citing works
Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M., & Lander, E. S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246981 · Cited by 2,856 · see citing works
Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine
Köster, J., & Rahmann, S. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 · Cited by 2,780 · see citing works
Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation
Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Adamson, B., Villalta, J. E., Chen, Y., Whitehead, E. H., Guimaraes, C., Panning, B., Ploegh, H. L., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 · Cited by 2,728 · see citing works
TAK1 is a ubiquitin-dependent kinase of MKK and IKK
Wang, C., Deng, L., Hong, M., Akkaraju, G. R., Inoue, J.-I., & Chen, Z. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35085597 · Cited by 2,125 · see citing works
Dixit, A., Parnas, O., Li, B., Chen, J., Fulco, C. P., Jerby-Arnon, L., Marjanovic, N. D., Dionne, D., Burks, T., Raychowdhury, R., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
A Lentiviral RNAi Library for Human and Mouse Genes Applied to an Arrayed Viral High-Content Screen
Moffat, J., Grueneberg, D. A., Yang, X., Kim, S. Y., Kloepfer, A. M., Hinkle, G., Piqani, B., Eisenhaure, T., Luo, B., Grenier, J. K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.040 · Cited by 1,803 · see citing works
NF-κB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions
Hayden, M. S., & Ghosh, S. (2012) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.183434.111 · Cited by 1,693 · see citing works
Computer Control of Microscopes Using µManager
Edelstein, A., Amodaj, N., Hoover, K., Vale, R. D., & Stuurman, N. (2010) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb1420s92 · Cited by 1,678 · see citing works
Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states
Wang, X., Allen, W. E., Wright, M. A., Sylwestrak, E. L., Samusik, N., Vesuna, S., Evans, K., Liu, C., Ramakrishnan, C., Liu, J., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5691 · Cited by 1,620 · see citing works
Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation
Doench, J. G., Hartenian, E., Graham, D. B., Tothova, Z., Hegde, M., Smith, I., Sullender, M., Ebert, B. L., Xavier, R. J., & Root, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3026 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
The IL-1 family: regulators of immunity
Sims, J. E., & Smith, D. E. (2010) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2691 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
Adamson, B., Norman, T. M., Jost, M., Cho, M. Y., Nuñez, J. K., Chen, Y., Villalta, J. E., Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Hein, M. Y., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Ubiquitin signalling in the NF-κB pathway
Chen, Z. J. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0805-758 · Cited by 1,184 · see citing works
Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout.
Datlinger, P., Rendeiro, A. F., Schmidl, C., Krausgruber, T., Traxler, P., Klughammer, J., Schuster, L. C., Kuchler, A., Alpar, D., & Bock, C. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4177 · Cited by 1,096 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In the second approach, we used the CRISPR droplet sequencing (CROP-seq) vector to directly sequence a Pol IItranscribed copy of the sgRNA, rather than relying on auxiliary barcodes (Datlinger et al., 2017).”
MethodSingle-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization
Lubeck, E., Coskun, A. F., Zhiyentayev, T., Ahmad, M., & Cai, L. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2892 · Cited by 985 · see citing works
Highly Multiplexed Subcellular RNA Sequencing in Situ
Lee, J. H., Daugharthy, E. R., Scheiman, J., Kalhor, R., Yang, J. L., Ferrante, T. C., Terry, R., Jeanty, S. S. F., Li, C., Amamoto, R., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1250212 · Cited by 973 · see citing works
In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells
Ke, R., Mignardi, M., Pacureanu, A., Svedlund, J., Botling, J., Wählby, C., & Nilsson, M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2563 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification
Heigwer, F., Kerr, G., & Boutros, M. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2812 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes
Neumann, B., Walter, T., Hèriché, J.-K., Bulkescher, J., Erfle, H., Conrad, C., Rogers, P., Poser, I., Held, M., Liebel, U., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08869 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq
Jaitin, D. A., Weiner, A., Yofe, I., Lara-Astiaso, D., Keren-Shaul, H., David, E., Salame, T. M., Tanay, A., van Oudenaarden, A., & Amit, I. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.039 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Functional genomic screen reveals genes involved in lipid-droplet formation and utilization
Guo, Y., Walther, T. C., Rao, M., Stuurman, N., Goshima, G., Terayama, K., Wong, J. S., Vale, R. D., Walter, P., & Farese, R. V. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06928 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies human host factors crucial for influenza virus replication
Karlas, A., Machuy, N., Shin, Y.-J., Pleissner, K., Artarini, A., Heuer, D., Becker, D., Khalil, H., Ogilvie, L., Hess, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08760 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Melnikov, A., Murugan, A., Zhang, X., Tesileanu, T., Wang, L., Rogov, P., Feizi, S., Gnirke, A., Callan, C. G., Kinney, J. B., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2137 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
A public genome-scale lentiviral expression library of human ORFs
Yang, X., Boehm, J. S., Yang, X., Salehi-Ashtiani, K., Hao, T., Shen, Y., Lubonja, R., Thomas, S. R., Alkan, O., Bhimdi, T., et al. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1638 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Both cIAP1 and cIAP2 regulate TNFα-mediated NF-κB activation
Mahoney, D. J., Cheung, H. H., Mrad, R. L., Plenchette, S., Simard, C., Enwere, E., Arora, V., Mak, T. W., Lacasse, E. C., Waring, J., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0711122105 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Image-based genome-wide siRNA screen identifies selective autophagy factors
Orvedahl, A., Sumpter, R., Xiao, G., Ng, A., Zou, Z., Tang, Y., Narimatsu, M., Gilpin, C. J., Sun, Q., Roth, M. G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10546 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity
Chia, N., Chan, Y.-S., Feng, B., Lu, X., Orlov, Y. L., Moreau, D., Kumar, P., Yang, L., Jiang, J., Lau, M.-S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09531 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Systems survey of endocytosis by multiparametric image analysis
Collinet, C., Stöter, M., Bradshaw, C. R., Samusik, N., Rink, J. C., Kenski, D. M., Habermann, B. H., Buchholz, F., Henschel, R., Mueller, M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08779 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks
Parnas, O., Jovanovic, M., Eisenhaure, T. M., Herbst, R. H., Dixit, A., Ye, C. J., Przybylski, D., Platt, R. J., Tirosh, I., Sanjana, N. E., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.059 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Self-citationIn situ detection and genotyping of individual mRNA molecules
Larsson, C., Grundberg, I., Söderberg, O., & Nilsson, M. F. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1448 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
KEAP1 E3 Ligase-Mediated Downregulation of NF-κB Signaling by Targeting IKKβ
Lee, D.-F., Kuo, H.-P., Liu, M., Chou, C.-K., Xia, W., Du, Y., Shen, J., Chen, C.-T., Huo, L., Hsu, M.-C., et al. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.025 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Dynamic regulation of pol II transcription by the mammalian Mediator complex
Malik, S., & Roeder, R. G. (2005) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.03.009 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency
Dang, Y., Jia, G., Choi, J., Ma, H., Anaya, E., Ye, C., Shankar, P., & Wu, H. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0846-3 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Linhoff, M. W., Laurén, J., Cassidy, R. M., Dobie, F. A., Takahashi, H., Nygaard, H. B., Airaksinen, M. S., Strittmatter, S. M., & Craig, A. M. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.017 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
The bromodomain protein Brd4 insulates chromatin from DNA damage signalling
Floyd, S., Pacold, M. E., Huang, Q., Clarke, S. M., Lam, F. C., Cannell, I. G., Bryson, B. D., Rameseder, J., Lee, M. J., Blake, E. J., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12147 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Rubin, A. J., Parker, K. R., Satpathy, A. T., Qi, Y., Wu, B., Ong, A. J., Mumbach, M. R., Ji, A. L., Kim, D. S., Cho, S. W., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.022 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Tada, K., Okazaki, T., Sakon, S., Kobarai, T., Kurosawa, K., Yamaoka, S., Hashimoto, H., Mak, T. W., Yagita, H., Okumura, K., et al. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m104837200 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Preparation of Single‐Cell RNA‐Seq Libraries for Next Generation Sequencing
Trombetta, J. J., Gennert, D. G., Lu, D. Y., Satija, R., Shalek, A. K., & Regev, A. (2014) · Current Protocols in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb0422s107 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Multiplex Cytological Profiling Assay to Measure Diverse Cellular States
Gustafsdottir, S. M., Ljosa, V., Sokolnicki, K. L., Anthony Wilson, J., Walpita, D., Kemp, M. M., Petri Seiler, K., Carrel, H. A., Golub, T. R., Schreiber, S. L., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080999 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
The deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 regulates cell growth via interaction with HCF-1
Machida, Y. J., Machida, Y., Vashisht, A. A., Wohlschlegel, J. A., & Dutta, A. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.046755 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
On the design of CRISPR-based single-cell molecular screens
Hill, A. J., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Starita, L. M., Gasperini, M. J., Matreyek, K. A., Packer, J., Jackson, D., Shendure, J., & Trapnell, C. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4604 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
DEBrowser: interactive differential expression analysis and visualization tool for count data
Küçükural, A., Yukselen, O., Özata, D. M., Moore, M. J., & Garber, M. G. (2019) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5362-x · Cited by 247 · see citing works
A20 zinc finger protein inhibits TNF and IL-1 signaling
Jäättelä, M., Mouritzen, H., Elling, F., & Bastholm, L. (1996) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.156.3.1166 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Misaghi, S., Ottosen, S., Izrael-Tomasevic, A., Arnott, D. P., Lamkanfi, M., Lee, J., Liu, J., O’Rourke, K. M., Dixit, V. M., & Wilson, A. C. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01517-08 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Efficient in situ barcode sequencing using padlock probe-based BaristaSeq
Chen, X., Sun, Y.-C., Church, G. M., Lee, J. H., & Zador, A. M. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1206 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Protein Barcodes Enable High-Dimensional Single-Cell CRISPR Screens
Wroblewska, A., Dhainaut, M., Ben-Zvi, B., Rose, S. A., Park, E. S., Amir, E.-A. D., Bektesevic, A., Baccarini, A., Merad, M., Rahman, A. H., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.022 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Deubiquitination of NF-κB by Ubiquitin-Specific Protease-7 promotes transcription
Colleran, A., Collins, P. E., O’Carroll, C., Ahmed, A., Mao, X., McManus, B., Kiely, P. A., Burstein, E., & Carmody, R. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208446110 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
OutKnocker: a web tool for rapid and simple genotyping of designer nuclease edited cell linesPreprint
Schmid-Burgk, J. L., Schmidt, T., Gaidt, M. M., Pelka, K., Latz, E., Ebert, T. S., & Hornung, V. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.176701.114 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationBauernfeind, F., Niepmann, S., Knolle, P. A., & Hornung, V. (2016) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1501336 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Levenshtein error-correcting barcodes for multiplexed DNA sequencing
Buschmann, T., & Bystrykh, L. V. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-272 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Germline BAP1 mutations induce a Warburg effect
Bononi, A., Yang, H., Giorgi, C., Patergnani, S., Pellegrini, L., Su, M., Xie, G., Signorato, V., Pastorino, S., Morris, P., et al. (2017) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.95 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization
Wang, C., Lu, T., Emanuel, G., Babcock, H. P., & Zhuang, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1903808116 · Cited by 111 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Image-based screening of pooled perturbations has thus far only been demonstrated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based approaches that required high-magnification imaging with limited scalability for mammalian applications (Lawson et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019).”
BackgroundGenome-wide siRNA screen for mediators of NF-κB activation
Gewurz, B. E., Towfic, F., Mar, J. C., Shinners, N. P., Takasaki, K., Zhao, B., Cahir-McFarland, E. D., Quackenbush, J., Xavier, R. J., & Kieff, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1120542109 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Accurate gene synthesis with tag-directed retrieval of sequence-verified DNA molecules
Schwartz, J. J., Lee, C., & Shendure, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2137 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
BAP1 inhibits the ER stress gene regulatory network and modulates metabolic stress response
Dai, F., Lee, H., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, L., Yao, H., Xi, Y., Xiao, Z.-D., You, M. J., Li, W., Su, X., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619588114 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Guermah, M., Malik, S., & Roeder, R. G. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.6.3234 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
In situ genotyping of a pooled strain library after characterizing complex phenotypes
Lawson, M. J., Camsund, D., Larsson, J., Baltekin, Ö., Fange, D., & Elf, J. (2017) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20177951 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Two Modes of Transcriptional Activation at Native Promoters by NF-κB p65
van Essen, D., Engist, B., Natoli, G., & Saccani, S. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000073 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sources of Error in Mammalian Genetic Screens
Sack, L. M., Davoli, T., Xu, Q., Li, M. Z., & Elledge, S. J. (2016) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.030973 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
High-throughput, image-based screening of pooled genetic-variant libraries
Emanuel, G., Moffitt, J. R., & Zhuang, X. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4495 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
de Groot, R., Lüthi, J., Lindsay, H., Holtackers, R., & Pelkmans, L. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20178064 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Frequent sgRNA-barcode recombination in single-cell perturbation assays
Xie, S., Cooley, A., Armendariz, D., Zhou, P., & Hon, G. C. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198635 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The p97-UFD1L-NPL4 Protein Complex Mediates Cytokine-Induced IκBα Proteolysis
Li, J.-M., Wu, H., Zhang, W., Blackburn, M. R., & Jin, J. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01190-13 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Feldman, D., Singh, A., Garrity, A. J., & Blainey, P. C. (2018) · doi:10.1101/262121 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, K. M., Mahajan, S. S., & Wilson, A. C. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.5.3930-3940.1999 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Approaches to maximize sgRNA-barcode coupling in Perturb-seq screens
Adamson, B., Norman, T. M., Jost, M., & Weissman, J. S. (2018) · doi:10.1101/298349 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cayli, S., Klug, J., Chapiro, J., Fröhlich, S., Krasteva, G., Orel, L., & Meinhardt, A. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.037952 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Kinetics of drug selection systems in mouse embryonic stem cells
Nakatake, Y., Fujii, S., Masui, S., Sugimoto, T., Nishikawa‐Torikai, S., Adachi, K., & Niwa, H. (2013) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/1472-6750-13-64 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A brief history of human disease genetics
Claussnitzer, M., Cho, J. H., Collins, R., Cox, N. J., Dermitzakis, E. T., Hurles, M. E., Kathiresan, S., Kenny, E. E., Lindgren, C. M., MacArthur, D. G., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1879-7 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq
Replogle, J. M., Saunders, R. A., Pogson, A. N., Hussmann, J. A., Lenail, A., Guna, A., Mascibroda, L., Wagner, E. J., Adelman, K., Lithwick-Yanai, G., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.013 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
The expanding vistas of spatial transcriptomics
Tian, L., Chen, F., & Macosko, E. Z. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01448-2 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Bock, C., Datlinger, P., Chardon, F. M., Coelho, M. A., Dong, M. B., Lawson, K. A., Lu, T., Maroc, L., Norman, T. M., Song, B., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00093-4 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing
Replogle, J. M., Norman, T. M., Xu, A., Hussmann, J. A., Chen, J., Cogan, J. Z., Meer, E. J., Terry, J. M., Riordan, D. P., Srinivas, N., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0470-y · Cited by 465 · see citing works
The emerging landscape of spatial profiling technologies
Moffitt, J. R., Lundberg, E., & Heyn, H. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00515-3 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Exploring genetic interaction manifolds constructed from rich single-cell phenotypes
Norman, T. M., Horlbeck, M. A., Replogle, J. M., Ge, A. Y., Xu, A., Jost, M., Gilbert, L. A., & Weissman, J. S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax4438 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Image-based profiling for drug discovery: due for a machine-learning upgrade?
Chandrasekaran, S. N., Ceulemans, H., Boyd, J. D., & Carpenter, A. E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-00117-w · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens
Hanna, R. E., Hegde, M., Fagre, C. R., DeWeirdt, P. C., Sangree, A. K., Szegletes, Z., Griffith, A., Feeley, M. N., Sanson, K. R., Baidi, Y., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.012 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Spatial components of molecular tissue biology
Palla, G., Fischer, D. S., Regev, A., & Theis, F. J. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01182-1 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
A new era in functional genomics screens
Przybyla, L., & Gilbert, L. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00409-w · Cited by 281 · see citing works
High-speed fluorescence image–enabled cell sorting
Schraivogel, D., Kuhn, T. M., Rauscher, B., Rodríguez‐Martínez, M., Paulsen, M. S., Owsley, K., Middlebrook, A. J., Tischer, C., Ramasz, B., Ordoñez‐Rueda, D., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj3013 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Spatial CRISPR genomics identifies regulators of the tumor microenvironment
Dhainaut, M., Rose, S. A., Aktürk, G., Wroblewska, A., Nielsen, S. R., Park, E. S., Buckup, M., Roudko, V., Pia, L., Sweeney, R. E., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.015 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
High-Throughput Mapping of Long-Range Neuronal Projection Using In Situ Sequencing
Chen, X., Sun, Y.-C., Zhan, H., Kebschull, J. M., Fischer, S., Matho, K. S., Huang, Z. J., Gillis, J. A., & Zador, A. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.023 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Bock, C., Datlinger, P., Chardon, F. M., Coelho, M. A., Dong, M. B., Lawson, K. A., Lu, T., Maroc, L., Norman, T. M., Song, B., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00098-7 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Spatially resolved single-cell genomics and transcriptomics by imaging
Zhuang, X. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01037-8 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
The phenotypic landscape of essential human genes
Funk, L., Su, K.-C., Ly, J., Feldman, D., Singh, A., Moodie, B., Blainey, P. C., & Cheeseman, I. M. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.017 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease
Kampmann, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0373-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Joint single-cell measurements of nuclear proteins and RNA in vivo
Chung, H., Parkhurst, C. N., Magee, E. M., Phillips, D., Habibi, E., Chen, F., Yeung, B. Z., Waldman, J., Artis, D., & Regev, A. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01278-1 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Rood, J. E., Hupalowska, A., & Regev, A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.035 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Binan, L., Jiang, A., Danquah, S. A., Valakh, V., Simonton, B., Bezney, J., Manguso, R. T., Yates, K. B., Nehme, R., Cleary, B., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.02.012 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Optophysiology: Illuminating cell physiology with optogenetics
Tan, P., He, L., Huang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2021 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Top-down design of protein architectures with reinforcement learning
Lutz, I. D., Wang, S., Norn, C., Courbet, A., Borst, A. J., Zhao, Y. T., Dosey, A. M., Cao, L., Xu, J., Leaf, E. M., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6591 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Integrative spatial analysis of cell morphologies and transcriptional states with MUSE
Bao, F., Deng, Y. C., Wan, S., Shen, S. Q., Wang, B., Dai, Q., Altschuler, S. J., & Wu, L. F. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01251-z · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Epigenome editing technologies for discovery and medicine
McCutcheon, S. R., Rohm, D., Iglesias, N., & Gersbach, C. A. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02320-1 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Illuminating RNA biology through imaging
Le, P., Ahmed, N., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00933-9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
CRISPR screens in plants: approaches, guidelines, and future prospects
Gaillochet, C., Develtere, W., & Jacobs, T. B. (2021) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koab099 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Cancer research needs a better map
Boehm, J. S., Garnett, M. J., Adams, D. J., Francies, H. E., Golub, T. R., Hahn, W. C., Iorio, F., McFarland, J. M., Parts, L., & Vázquez, F. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00182-0 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
CRISPR screens for functional interrogation of immunity
Shi, H., Doench, J. G., & Chi, H. (2022) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00802-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Interplay between Cellular Metabolism and the DNA Damage Response in Cancer
Moretton, A., & Loizou, J. I. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12082051 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Lalli, M. A., Avey, D. R., Dougherty, J. D., Milbrandt, J., & Mitra, R. D. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.262295.120 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
In situ readout of DNA barcodes and single base edits facilitated by in vitro transcription
Askary, A., Sánchez-Guardado, L. Ó., Linton, J. M., Chadly, D. M., Budde, M. W., Cai, L., Lois, C., & Elowitz, M. B. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0299-4 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Mapping human cell phenotypes to genotypes with single-cell genomics
Camp, J. G., Platt, R. J., & Treutlein, B. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax6648 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microraft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors
Wheeler, E. C., Vu, A. Q., Einstein, J. M., DiSalvo, M., Ahmed, N., Nostrand, E. L. V., Shishkin, A. A., Jin, W., Allbritton, N. L., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0826-8 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
High-content imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens in mammalian cells
Yan, X., Stuurman, N., Ribeiro, S. A., Tanenbaum, M. E., Horlbeck, M. A., Liem, C. R., Jost, M., Weissman, J. S., & Vale, R. D. (2020) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202008158 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
A Live-Cell Screen for Altered Erk Dynamics Reveals Principles of Proliferative Control
Goglia, A. G., Wilson, M. Z., Jena, S. G., Silbert, J., Basta, L. P., Devenport, D., & Toettcher, J. E. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.02.005 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Zheng, X., Wu, B., Liu, Y., Simmons, S., Kim, K., Clarke, G. S., Ashiq, A., Park, J. C., Li, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.050 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Image-based pooled whole-genome CRISPRi screening for subcellular phenotypes
Kanfer, G., Sarraf, S. A., Maman, Y., Baldwin, H. A., Domínguez‐Martín, E., Johnson, K. R., Ward, M. E., Kampmann, M., Lippincott‐Schwartz, J., & Youle, R. J. (2020) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202006180 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Scalable Functional Assays for the Interpretation of Human Genetic Variation
Tabet, D. R., Parikh, V. N., Mali, P., Roth, F. P., & Claussnitzer, M. (2022) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-072920-032107 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Video-based pooled screening yields improved far-red genetically encoded voltage indicators
Tian, H., Davis, H. C., Wong-Campos, J. D., Park, P., Fan, L. Z., Gmeiner, B., Begum, S., Werley, C. A., Borja, G. B., Upadhyay, H., et al. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01743-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
High‐throughput, microscope‐based sorting to dissect cellular heterogeneity
Hasle, N., Cooke, A., Srivatsan, S. R., Huang, H. Z., Stephany, J. J., Krieger, Z., Jackson, D. L., Tang, W., Pendyala, S., Monnat, R. J., et al. (2020) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20209442 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A genome-wide atlas of human cell morphology
Ramezani, M., Weisbart, E., Bauman, J., Singh, A. K., Yong, J., Lozada, M., Way, G. P., Kavari, S. L., Diaz, C., Leardini, E., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02537-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwartz, M. S., Moen, E., Miller, G., Dougherty, T., Borba, E., Ding, R., Graf, W., Pao, E., & Valen, D. V. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/803205 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Synthetic lethal strategies for the development of cancer therapeutics
Ngoi, N. Y. L., Gallo, D., Torrado, C., Nardo, M., Durocher, D., & Yap, T. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00966-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Mitochondria-organelle crosstalk in establishing compartmentalized metabolic homeostasis
Chen, B., Lyssiotis, C. A., & Shah, Y. M. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.03.003 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression in perturbation atlases
Nadig, A., Replogle, J. M., Pogson, A. N., Murthy, M., McCarroll, S. A., Weissman, J. S., Robinson, E. B., & O’Connor, L. J. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02169-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Barcoded oligonucleotides ligated on RNA amplified for multiplexed and parallel in situ analyses
Liu, S., Punthambaker, S., Iyer, E. P. R., Ferrante, T. C., Goodwin, D., Fürth, D., Pawlowski, A. C., Jindal, K., Tam, J. M., Mifflin, L., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab120 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The use of new CRISPR tools in cardiovascular research and medicine
Nishiga, M., Liu, C., Qi, L. S., & Wu, J. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00669-3 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Hoberecht, L., Perampalam, P., Lun, A. T. L., & Fortin, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34320-7 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Pervasive mislocalization of pathogenic coding variants underlying human disorders
Lacoste, J., Haghighi, M., Haider, S., Reno, C., Lin, Z., Segal, D., Qian, W. W., Xiong, X., Teelucksingh, T., Miglietta, E. A., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.003 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Versatile phenotype-activated cell sorting
Lee, J., Liu, Z., Suzuki, P., Ahrens, J. F., Lai, S., Lu, X., Guan, S. A., & St-Pierre, F. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb7438 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Multiplexed, image-based pooled screens in primary cells and tissues with PerturbView
Kudo, T., Meireles, A. M., Moncada, R., Chen, Y., Wu, P., Gould, J., Hu, X., Kornfeld, O., Jesudason, R., Foo, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02391-0 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationCellSAM: A Foundation Model for Cell SegmentationPreprint
Israel, U., Marks, M., Dilip, R., Li, Q., Yu, C., Laubscher, E., Iqbal, A., Pradhan, E., Ates, A., Abt, M., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.17.567630 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Saunders, R. A., Allen, W. E., Pan, X., Sandhu, J., Lu, J., Lau, T. K., Smolyar, K., Sullivan, Z. A., Dulac, C. G., Weissman, J. S., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.022 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Nuisance compounds in cellular assays
Dahlin, J. L., Auld, D. S., Rothenaigner, I., Haney, S., Sexton, J. Z., Nissink, J. W. M., Walsh, J. J., Lee, J. A., Strelow, J. M., Willard, F. S., et al. (2021) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.021 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Pooled genetic perturbation screens with image-based phenotypes
Feldman, D., Funk, L., Le, A., Carlson, R. J., Leiken, M. D., Tsai, F., Soong, B., Singh, A., & Blainey, P. C. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00653-8 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping multimodal phenotypes to perturbations in cells and tissue with CRISPRmap
Gu, J., Iyer, A., Wesley, B., Taglialatela, A., Leuzzi, G., Hangai, S., Decker, A., Gu, R., Klickstein, N., Shuai, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02386-x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Systematic discovery of CRISPR-boosted CAR T cell immunotherapies
Datlinger, P., Pankevich, E. V., Arnold, C. D., Pranckevicius, N., Lin, J., Romanovskaia, D., Schaefer, M., Piras, F., Orts, A.-C., Nemc, A., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09507-9 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Ultrack: pushing the limits of cell tracking across biological scales
Bragantini, J., Theodoro, I., Zhao, X., Huijben, T. A. P. M., Hirata-Miyasaki, E., VijayKumar, S., Balasubramanian, A., Lao, T., Agrawal, R., Xiao, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02778-0 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Viñas Torné, R., Wiatrak, M., Piran, Z., Fan, S., Jiang, L., Teichmann, S. A., Nitzan, M., & Brbić, M. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02777-8 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Spatial transcriptomics for profiling the tropism of viral vectors in tissues
Jang, M. J., Coughlin, G. M., Jackson, C. R., Chen, X., Chuapoco, M. R., Vendemiatti, J., Wang, A. Z., & Gradinaru, V. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01648-w · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a for higher-order combinatorial chromatin perturbations
Hsiung, C. C. ‐., Wilson, C. M., Sambold, N. A., Dai, R., Chen, Q., Teyssier, N., Misiukiewicz, S., Arab, A., O’Loughlin, T. A., Cofsky, J. C., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02224-0 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Moving from in vitro to in vivo CRISPR screens
Kuhn, M., Santinha, A. J., & Platt, R. J. (2021) · Gene and Genome Editing · doi:10.1016/j.ggedit.2021.100008 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Midbrain Dopaminergic Neuron Development at the Single Cell Level: In vivo and in Stem Cells
Ásgrímsdóttir, E. S., & Arenas, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00463 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Single-cell image analysis to explore cell-to-cell heterogeneity in isogenic populations
Ušaj, M. M., Yeung, C. H. L., Friesen, H., Boone, C. M., & Andrews, B. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.010 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens
Hanna, R. E., Hegde, M., Fagre, C. R., DeWeirdt, P. C., Sangree, A. K., Szegletes, Z., Griffith, A., Feeley, M. N., Sanson, K. R., Baidi, Y., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.17.100818 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
“…screens require only a short sequencing read, they are theoretically compatible with alternative pooled screening readouts, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (Datlinger et al., 2017; Dixit et al., 2016; Hill et al., 2018; Replogle et al., 2020) and pooled optical screens (Feldman et al., 2019).”
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Kornienko, J., Rodríguez‐Martínez, M., Fenzl, K., Hinze, F., Schraivogel, D., Grosch, M., Tunaj, B., Lindenhofer, D., Schraft, L., Kueblbeck, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39965-6 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Morphological profiling for drug discovery in the era of deep learning
Tang, Q., Ratnayake, R., Seabra, G. D. M., Jiang, Z., Fang, R., Cui, L., Ding, Y., Kahveci, T., Bian, J., Li, C., et al. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae284 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Baysoy, A., Tian, X., Renauer, P. A., Zhang, F., Bai, Z., Shi, H., Yang, M., Zhang, D., Liu, M., Li, H., et al. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03127-y · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationLineage Tracing: Computational Reconstruction Goes Beyond the Limit of Imaging.
Wu, S.-H. S., Lee, J., & Koo, B. (2019) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.14348/molcells.2019.0006 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease
Joseph, S. A., Taglialatela, A., Leuzzi, G., Huang, J., Cuella-Martin, R., & Ciccia, A. (2020) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102943 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Sequencing-free whole-genome spatial transcriptomics at single-molecule resolution
Cheng, Y., Dang, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Yu, R., Miao, L., Jin, S., Han, A., Katz, S. G., & Wang, S. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.09.006 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
CellSAM: a foundation model for cell segmentation
Marks, M., Israel, U., Dilip, R., Li, Q., Yu, C., Laubscher, E., Iqbal, A., Pradhan, E., Ates, A., Abt, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02879-w · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Technologies and Computational Analysis Strategies for CRISPR Applications
Clement, K., Hsu, J. Y., Canver, M. C., Joung, J. K., & Pinello, L. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.012 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Single-cell genomics to understand disease pathogenesis
Nomura, S. (2020) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-020-00844-3 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Spatially Resolved in vivo CRISPR Screen Sequencing via Perturb-DBiTPreprint
Baysoy, A., Tian, X., Zhang, F., Renauer, P. A., Bai, Z., Shi, H., Li, H., Tao, B., Yang, M., Enninful, A., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.18.624106 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPR Screens in Synthetic Lethality and Combinatorial Therapies for Cancer
Castells‐Roca, L., Tejero, E., Rodríguez‐Santiago, B., & Surrallés, J. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13071591 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Massively Parallel CRISPR‐Based Genetic Perturbation Screening at Single‐Cell Resolution
Cheng, J., Lin, G., Wang, T., Wang, Y., Guo, W., Liao, J., Yang, P., Chen, J., Shao, X., Lu, X., et al. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202204484 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
CRISPR screen in mechanism and target discovery for cancer immunotherapy
Liu, D., Zhao, X., Tang, A., Xu, X., Liu, S., Zha, L., Ma, W., Zheng, J., & Shi, M. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188378 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Identification and selectivity profiling of small-molecule degraders via multi-omics approaches
Scholes, N. S., Mayor‐Ruiz, C., & Winter, G. E. (2021) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.03.007 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A genome-wide optical pooled screen reveals regulators of cellular antiviral responses
Carlson, R. J., Leiken, M. D., Guna, A., Hacohen, N., & Blainey, P. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2210623120 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationFei, X., Huang, J., Li, F., Wang, Y., Shao, Z., Dong, L., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhang, X., Lv, B., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112586 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
CRISPR-Combo–mediated orthogonal genome editing and transcriptional activation for plant breeding
Pan, C., & Qi, Y. (2023) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-023-00823-w · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Genetic interaction networks in cancer cells
Mair, B., Moffat, J., Boone, C. M., & Andrews, B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2019.03.002 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Sivanandan, S., Leitmann, B., Lubeck, E., Sultan, M. M., Stanitsas, P., Ranu, N., Ewer, A., Mancuso, J. E., Phillips, Z. F., Kim, A. M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66778-6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic functional interrogation of SARS-CoV-2 host factors using Perturb-seq
Sunshine, S., Puschnik, A. S., Replogle, J. M., Laurie, M. T., Liu, J., Zha, B. S., Nuñez, J. K., Byrum, J. R., McMorrow, A. H., Frieman, M. B., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41788-4 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Comparative landscape of genetic dependencies in human and chimpanzee stem cells
She, R., Fair, T., Schaefer, N. K., Saunders, R. A., Pavlovic, B. J., Weissman, J. S., & Pollen, A. A. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.043 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Encoding Method of Single-cell Spatial Transcriptomics Sequencing
Zhou, Y., Jia, E., Pan, M., Zhao, X., & Ge, Q. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.43887 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Yin, J., Frick, L. D., Scheidmann, M. C., Liu, T., Trevisan, C., Dhingra, A., Spinelli, A., Wu, Y., Yao, L., Vena, D. L., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01278-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tumor immunology CRISPR screening: present, past, and future
Dong, M. B., Tang, K., Zhou, X., Zhou, J. J., & Chen, S. (2021) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2021.11.009 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Pooled genetic screens with image‐based profiling
Walton, R. T., Singh, A. K., & Blainey, P. C. (2022) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202110768 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationOptofluidic imaging meets deep learning: from merging to emerging
Siu, D. M. D., Lee, K. C. M., Chung, B. M. F., Wong, J. S. J., Zheng, G., & Tsia, K. K. (2023) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d2lc00813k · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Morris, J. A., Sun, J. S., & Sanjana, N. E. (2023) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Guide RNA library-based CRISPR screens in plants: opportunities and challenges
Pan, C., Li, G., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Qi, Y. (2023) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102883 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screening in stem cells: theories, applications and challenges
Zhou, H., Peng, Y., Xiong, W., Duan, X., Jing, S., He, Y., Zeng, Z. R., Wei, Y., & Ye, Q. (2024) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03831-z · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Methods and applications of in vivo CRISPR screening
Santinha, A. J., Strano, A., & Platt, R. J. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-025-00873-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Gaining insight into metabolic diseases from human genetic discoveries
Claussnitzer, M., & Suszták, K. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.07.005 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Cerebral Organoids as an Experimental Platform for Human Neurogenomics
Nowakowski, T. J., & Salama, S. R. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11182803 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Reicher, A., Koren, A., & Kubicek, S. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.261503.120 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feldman, D., Singh, A., Schmid-Burgk, J. L., Carlson, R. J., Mezger, A., Garrity, A. J., Zhang, F., & Blainey, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blainey, Paul C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-799.e17
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6886477
- OpenAlex
- W2981110120
- Semantic Scholar
- 4ac904487e165a54a99e56a0af9b952e502302a2
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- demultiplexing, image-based phenotyping, NF-κB signaling, Mediator complex, live-cell imaging, mammalian cells
- MeSH terms
- RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Nucleus, Genetic Testing, Humans, NF-kappa B, Genomics, Transcription Factor RelA, Mediator Complex, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review