Cited by 304Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

LIVECell—A large-scale dataset for label-free live cell segmentation

Open access
Edlund, Christoffer, Jackson, Timothy R., Khalid, Nabeel, Bevan, Nicola, Dale, Timothy, Dengel, Andreas, Ahmed, Sheraz, Trygg, Johan +1 more·2021·Nature Methods

Abstract

Light microscopy combined with well-established protocols of two-dimensional cell culture facilitates high-throughput quantitative imaging to study biological phenomena. Accurate segmentation of individual cells in images enables exploration of complex biological questions, but can require sophisticated imaging processing pipelines in cases of low contrast and high object density. Deep learning-based methods are considered state-of-the-art for image segmentation but typically require vast amounts of annotated data, for which there is no suitable resource available in the field of label-free cellular imaging. Here, we present LIVECell, a large, high-quality, manually annotated and expert-validated dataset of phase-contrast images, consisting of over 1.6 million cells from a diverse set of cell morphologies and culture densities. To further demonstrate its use, we train convolutional neural network-based models using LIVECell and evaluate model segmentation accuracy with a proposed a suite of benchmarks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-021-01249-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LiveCell dataset consists of 3,188 training and 1,516 test images of eight different cell lines collected using phase-contrast microscopy, and each image has manual segmentations of the cells.

    “The LiveCell dataset consists of 3,188 training and 1,516 test images of eight different cell lines collected using phase-contrast microscopy, and each image has manual segmentations of the cells (https://sartorius-research.github.io/LIVECell/)7.”

    From Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Levene, H. in Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling (eds Olkin, I. et al.) 279–292 (Stanford Univ. Press, 1961).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edlund, C., Jackson, T. R., Khalid, N., Bevan, N., Dale, T., Dengel, A., Ahmed, S., Trygg, J., & Sjögren, R.
Affiliations
  • Sartorius (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Sjögren, Rickard
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2021-08-30
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1038-1045
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W3196890347
Cited by
304
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
cell segmentation, label-free imaging, phase contrast microscopy, convolutional neural networks, segmentation benchmark, cell culture, high-throughput imaging, cell morphology
MeSH terms
Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Models, Biological, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review