An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys
Abstract
We carried out an experiment that compared telephone and Web versions of a questionnaire that assessed attitudes toward science and knowledge of basic scientific facts. Members of a random digit dial (RDD) sample were initially contacted by telephone and answered a few screening questions, including one that asked whether they had Internet access. Those with Internet access were randomly assigned to complete either a Web version of the questionnaire or a computer-assisted telephone interview. There were four main findings. First, although we offered cases assigned to the Web survey a larger incentive, fewer of them completed the online questionnaire; almost all those who were assigned to the telephone condition completed the interview. The two samples of Web users nonetheless had similar demographic characteristics. Second, the Web survey produced less item nonresponse than the telephone survey. The Web questionnaire prompted respondents when they left an item blank, whereas the telephone interviewers accepted “no opinion” answers without probing them. Third, Web respondents gave less differentiated answers to batteries of attitude items than their telephone counterparts. The Web questionnaire presented these items in a grid that may have made their similarity more salient. Finally, Web respondents took longer to complete the knowledge items, particularly those requiring open-ended answers, than the telephone respondents, and Web respondents answered a higher percentage of them correctly. These differences between Web and telephone surveys probably reflect both inherent differences between the two modes and incidental features of our implementation of the survey. The mode differences also vary by item type and by respondent age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selection bias from non-probability sampling can reduce the external validity of findings.
“Fricker, Galesic, Tourangeau and Yan [76] associate the method with selection bias which can reduce the external validity of findings.”
From Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage (2020) · cites this paper as [76]
Non-probability online network sampling has problems of sample representativeness.
“Although the use of online network sampling technique suits the context of the present study and is effective in improving sample size, it has problems of sample representativeness.”
From Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage (2020) · cites this paper as [76]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-injurious behaviors in a college population
Whitlock, J., Eckenrode, J., & Silverman, D. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2543 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels
Prepared for the AAPOR Executive Council by a Task Force operating under the auspices of the AAPOR Standards Committee, W. M. I., Baker, R., Blumberg, S. J., Brick, J. M., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennis, J. M., Dillman, D., Frankel, M. R., Garland, P., et al. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfq048 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Omar, B., & Dequan, W. (2020) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
“Fricker, Galesic, Tourangeau and Yan [76] associate the method with selection bias which can reduce the external validity of findings.”
MethodSampling methods for web and e-mail surveys
Fricker, R. D. (2008) · The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9780857020055.n11 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2013) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-66 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
“, telephone surveys) in some aspects such as less item nonresponse, and worse in other aspects such as response rate and item differentiation [73].”
BackgroundAttachment Styles and Male Sex Addiction
Zapf, J. L., Greiner, J., & Carroll, J. (2008) · Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity · doi:10.1080/10720160802035832 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Thornton, J. R. (2025) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x251347623 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fricker, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, S.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 370-392
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2094244305
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 57.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Keywords
- online surveys, telephone surveys, survey mode effects, attitudes toward science, scientific knowledge, item nonresponse, survey response rates, computer-assisted telephone interviewing, survey implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review