Cited by 275Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index

Open access
Hervás, Gonzalo, Vázquez, Carmelo·2013·Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract

PURPOSE: We introduce the Pemberton Happiness Index (PHI), a new integrative measure of well-being in seven languages, detailing the validation process and presenting psychometric data. The scale includes eleven items related to different domains of remembered well-being (general, hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well-being) and ten items related to experienced well-being (i.e., positive and negative emotional events that possibly happened the day before); the sum of these items produces a combined well-being index. METHODS: A distinctive characteristic of this study is that to construct the scale, an initial pool of items, covering the remembered and experienced well-being domains, were subjected to a complete selection and validation process. These items were based on widely used scales (e.g., PANAS, Satisfaction With Life Scale, Subjective Happiness Scale, and Psychological Well-Being Scales). Both the initial items and reference scales were translated into seven languages and completed via Internet by participants (N = 4,052) aged 16 to 60 years from nine countries (Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, and USA). RESULTS: Results from this initial validation study provided very good support for the psychometric properties of the PHI (i.e., internal consistency, a single-factor structure, and convergent and incremental validity). CONCLUSIONS: Given the PHI's good psychometric properties, this simple and integrative index could be used as an instrument to monitor changes in well-being. We discuss the utility of this integrative index to explore well-being in individuals and communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1477-7525-11-66

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Seligman MEP Authentic happiness 2002 New York: Free Press
  2. Cummins RA Personal Wellbeing Index – Adult. 4th Edition. The International Wellbeing Group 2006 Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University
  3. Nunnally J Bernstein I Psychometric Theory 1994 3 New York: McGraw Hill
  4. Cummins RA Gullone E Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities 2000 Singapore: National University of Singapore 74 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Hervás, Gonzalo
Venue
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2013
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
66
ISSN
1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150838967
Cited by
274
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
well-being measurement, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, social well-being, experienced well-being, cross-cultural translation, scale validation, positive and negative emotions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Happiness, Health Status, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Chi-Square Distribution, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review