Comparing Check-All and Forced-Choice Question Formats in Web Surveys
Abstract
For survey researchers, it is common practice to use the check-all question format in Web and mail surveys but to convert to the forced-choice question format in telephone surveys. The assumption underlying this practice is that respondents will answer the two formats similarly. In this research note we report results from 16 experimental comparisons in two Web surveys and a paper survey conducted in 2002 and 2003 that test whether the check-all and forced-choice formats produce similar results. In all 16 comparisons, we find that the two question formats do not perform similarly; respondents endorse more options and take longer to answer in the forced-choice format than in the check-all format. These findings suggest that the forced-choice question format encourages deeper processing of response options and, as such, is preferable to the check-all format, which may encourage a weak satisficing response strategy. Additional analyses show that neither acquiescence bias nor item nonresponse seem to pose substantial problems for use of the forced-choice question format in Web surveys.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data quality was ensured by excluding inattentive or careless responses using a Directed Question Scale attention check and extreme response duration criteria.
“To ensure data quality, responses from inattentive or careless individuals were excluded from the analysis through multiple criteria.”
From Development and validation of the Japanese version of the psychological preparedness for disaster threat scale (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design Effects in the Transition to Web-Based Surveys
Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.008 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationKnowledge of Dementia Among the Australian Health Workforce: A National Online Survey
Annear, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464817752085 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Kubo, T., Takamoto, M., Suzuki, M., Takenouchi, K., & Sadamitsu, C. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-05639-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smyth, J. D.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-77
- ISSN
- 0033-362X
- 1537-5331
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
